Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on May 20, 2006 By COL Gene In Politics


Six months after their last election a new government was put in place in Iraq less two KEY positions -Defense and Interior Ministers that do not have permenant appointments. Ten members walked out at the start of the session. The violence continues all over Iraq:

27 Killed in dozens of attacks
21 bodies found from death squads
People stoned a British vehicle that was bombed.

Bush tells us that the new government was needed to STOP this violence. Let's watch and see if the sectarian violence in Iraq ends now that a NEW Governmet is in place!




Iraqi Parliament Approves New Cabinet
May 20, 2006 6:16 AM EDT
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq's parliament approved a national unity government on Saturday, achieving a goal the U.S. hopes will reduce widespread violence so that U.S. forces can eventually go home. But as the legislators met, at least 27 people were killed and dozens wounded in a series of attacks.
Police also found the bodies of 21 Iraqis who apparently had been kidnapped and tortured by death squads that plague the capital and another area. The wounded included two British soldiers whose convoy was hit by a roadside bomb in the southern city of Basra, police said.
In a show of hands, the 275-member parliament approved each Cabinet minister proposed by incoming Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The new ministers then took their oaths of office in the nationally televised session in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone.
That completed a democratic process that began following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.
In his first address, al-Maliki told parliament that he would make restoring stability and security the top priority of his new administration. He said he would "work fast" to improve and coordinate Iraqi forces so they can reduce attacks by insurgent groups and militias.
Al-Maliki said he would set "an objective timetable to transfer the full security mission to Iraqi forces, ending the mission of the multinational forces."
But his failure to fill the top two security posts illustrated the challenges ahead. Al-Maliki, a Shiite, said he would be acting interior minister for now, and he made Salam Zikam al-Zubaie, a Sunni Arab, the temporary defense minister.
That angered some legislators, and before the Cabinet was approved by a show of hands, parliament turned down a motion by Sunni Arab leader Saleh al-Mutlaq to postpone the session.
Al-Mutlaq then walked out with about 10 other Sunni deputies.
The defense ministry oversees the army, while the interior ministry is responsible for police.
The United States hopes the new national unity government of Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds can calm the violence and pave the way for Washington to begin withdrawing U.S. troops.
"This is a historic day for Iraq and all its people," deputy parliament speaker Khalid al-Attiyah said at a nationally televised news conference as the legislators gathered.
"It is the first time that a full-term, democratically elected government has been formed in Iraq since the fall of the ousted regime. This government represents all Iraqis," said al-Attiyah, a bearded Shiite cleric wearing a white turban.
The legislative session began at about 1:30 p.m., two and a half hours later than planned as al-Maliki held last-minute meetings with other politicians, apparently to hammer out final agreements on some of the Cabinet portfolios.
U.S. and Iraqi forces didn't impose day time curfews or ban traffic in Baghdad and major cities, as they did during previous national elections and constitutional referendum. But security was heavy in the Green Zone and the capital's airspace was closed to commercial flights at Baghdad's international airport. The government and U.S. officials declined to say why.
About 100 stranded passengers and airport workers crowded around a television set in the departure lounge to watch the parliament session.
Meanwhile, violence continued in Iraq.
At 6:30 a.m. on Saturday, several hours before legislators began to arrive at the Green Zone, suspected insurgents set off a bomb hidden in a paper bag in a Shiite district of Baghdad, killing 19 people and wounding 58, police said. The blast occurred near a food stand in Sadr City where men gather to wait for jobs as day laborers, police Maj. Hashim al-Yaser said.
"It was a huge explosion," said Mohammed Hamid, who works in a bakery in the area. "We carried many of the injured to ambulances and helped remove the bodies."
Police Lt. Col. Falah al-Mohammedawi said 19 people were killed and 58 wounded. Many of the injured were rushed to nearby Imam Ali Hospital, where hallways were filled with doctors and nurses treating and bandaging the wounded.
Sadr City is the stronghold of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who operates a powerful militia, one of many that exist in the capital outside the control of the government. Al-Maliki hopes to disband such militias and integrate them into the country's military and police forces as a way of reducing violence.
In the western border town of Qaim, a suicide car bomber killed at least five people and wounded 10 in an attack on a police station, the head of the local hospital said. Hamdi al-Alousi, the head of the Qaim hospital, did not have any details about the attack.
In the northern city of Mosul, a suicide bomber reportedly trying to target a U.S. military convoy instead killed three Iraqi civilians. Police Brig. Abdul-Hamid al-Jibouri said the attack took place in Mosul's eastern neighborhood of Sukar.
Elsewhere, police found the bodies of 21 people who apparently had been kidnapped and tortured, six in Baghdad and 15 in Musayyib, about 40 miles south of the capital.

Comments (Page 2)
6 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on May 21, 2006
Col, why don't you tell us how you democrats will solve the problems?


simple, they will tax the crap out of everyone, then tax them some more, while giving themselves a huge raise,, tax free of course.
on May 22, 2006
IsladnDog
The information on the jobs comes from the U.S. Metro Economics 2004-2005 Report that was completed for the U S Conference of Mayors that was released in January 2006. The entire backup is contained in my new book. Go to www.saveusanow.com if you want the FACTS not the BS written by many people on this Blog Site.

As for the Budget-- It is very simple. If we spend $2.7 Trillion as proposed we must TAX $2.7 Trillion. We can not continue to SPEND more then WE TAX! If we do not want to TAX at a rate of $2.7 Trillion then we can not SPEND at that rate. The Democrats are saying we must balance the budget. That is WHAT the GOP said in the past-- Prior to Reagan!
on May 22, 2006
The information on the jobs comes from the U.S. Metro Economics 2004-2005 Report that was completed for the U S Conference of Mayors that was released in January 2006. The entire backup is contained in my new book. Go to www.saveusanow.com if you want the FACTS not the BS written by many people on this Blog Site.


Fact, you book, and your blogs don't belong in the same sentence. Kerry tried the "jobs aren't paying enough" rhetoric when he was campaigning, and it was proved to be false.


he Democrats are saying we must balance the budget. That is WHAT the GOP said in the past-- Prior to Reagan!


Everybody is saying the budget must be balanced. The democrats have no plan on how to do it. If you want to tax so bad, let's have a minimum tax on the poor. You are a true liberal who loves to tax everyone who you think can afford it. How socialist of you.
on May 22, 2006
First, my book documents where the facts come from. This study was a very comprehensive study done for the U S Conference of Mayors and does document that the jobs created in 2004 and 2005 pay, on the average 21% less the jobs that were lost in 2001-2003. It also documents the 18 states that have not recovered the NUMBER of jobs lost. This report also documents that the newly created jobs have fewer benefits, especially health and retirement. This study was NOT done for EITHER the GOP or the Democrats. It was done for the U S Conference of Mayors which is composed of elected mayors of ALL parties. You just want to ignore any facts that do not reflect well on George!

If the Republicans agree that we need to balance the budget, why do the pass tax and spending that is out of balance. In 2005 we spent $620 Billion MORE then we taxed. The GOP controls BOTH houses of Congress and the White House. YOU CAN NOT BALIM the Democrats.
on May 22, 2006
First, my book documents where the facts come from.


Facts and anything you do are not valid. You constantly misrepresent "facts" and refuse to acknowledge anything that contradicts your "facts".


YOU CAN NOT BALIM the Democrats.


Of course I can. They are still part of the government. What are their solutions col?
on May 22, 2006
In his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention July 29 Kerry repeated a claim that the economy is creating jobs that pay $9,000 a year less than those they replace. He bases that on disputed analysis from a liberal think tank.

In fact, economists disagree about whether jobs are getting worse or better. As we said before, there's evidence both ways. Even some Democratic economists say the economic numbers are simply too rough and contradictory to allow any conclusion about the direction of change, let alone about how much less or more the new jobs pay.

Kerry also said "wages are falling" when in fact they are increasing. It's true wages haven't kept up with inflation for the past several months. But even after adjusting for inflation they're still higher than when Bush took office.

And when Kerry said the "middle class is shrinking," he was referring to what happened in the recession of 2001 and the initially slow recovery of 2002. But the economy has picked up considerably in the 19 months since, so what was true then may be untrue when phrased in present tense.


Kerry bases his claim on an analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data by the Economic Policy Institute. But the EPI figures don't support what Kerry said, because they don't actually compare new jobs and old jobs -- only broad averages for entire industries. And as we reported July 9, other BLS numbers that compare occupation groups within industries tell a completely different story -- showing higher-paying groups growing faster than lower-paying groups.

We also said then that there's evidence on both sides of the good-jobs, bad-jobs debate, that there's no economic data detailed enough to settle the matter, and that economists disagree about whether job quality is improving or not. All that continues to be true.

Brookings Institution economist Barry Bosworth, a former Carter administration official, says Kerry's approach is "very misleading:"


http://www.factcheck.org/article228.html
on May 22, 2006
Island Dog

You are the Liar. The facts I used can not be contradicted by ANY reputable other source. Since when would data from the Treasury, Dept of Labor, Dept of Commerce, OMB and CBO not be reliable. The truth is that you do not like what these FACTS show. I have used some material from experts that you could choose to disagree with however, saying experts such as Greenspan, O'Neil, and the various academic experts I sight do not know what they are talking about just shows your ignorance. I did not sight OFF THE WALL experts or organizations.
on May 22, 2006
Oh lord another useless article. You'd think this guy was getting great coverage, but he only writes to those who disagree with him. Talk about a dumb way to get his point across.

The Iraq Carnage Continues


Just proof that Col sees the Iraqi people as nothing but animals, a bunch of savages who kill each other for no reason.

But here's the real kicker:

Bush tells us that the new government was needed to STOP this violence. Let's watch and see if the sectarian violence in Iraq ends now that a NEW Governmet is in place!


Once again the ignorance of a self-proclaimed educated person beats his own title. Sure, forget about all those insurgents caught and/or killed but the Iraqi military and how they are proving to be well on their way in taking over all of the US military missions. Insurgents may still be killing people, but they are lossing the battle, eventually they will slow down. But what do you care, you yourself said this:

If the people of Iraq do not end the violence then so be it. Let them kill each other.


The violence is mostly against Iraqis, but even thought you claim not to care by saying let them kill each other, you put these article about how many die in Iraq everyday, mostly Iraqis. You're a hypocrit Col. You don't even know how to express yourself without tripping over everything else you already said. What a waste.
on May 22, 2006
The facts I used can not be contradicted by ANY reputable other source. Since when would data from the Treasury, Dept of Labor, Dept of Commerce, OMB and CBO not be reliable.


Are you talking about offices of the same branch where the lying President of the United States works at? This is the best proof of stupidity Col has ever provided for us. All these offices, Gov't offices, can not be lies because they are US Gov't offices, yet......, yet the President of the US which has the highest office in the US Gov't is the biggest liar according to Col. Now how can I trust any of those offices to tell the truth when, according to Mr. Ding Dong over here, the President is the biggest liar and part of the whole system?

Stupid Col, you are stupid and don't know how to debate.
on May 22, 2006
You are the Liar. The facts I used can not be contradicted by ANY reputable other source.


Col, I just did and have before. Remember how you skewed the unemployment numbers until you were called out about it? Remember how you were wrong about the tax cuts? I have proven you wrong so many times I have lost count.


The truth is that you do not like what these FACTS show.


That is so ironic col. When is the last time you read an article about the good news from the economy or Iraq? This is a question you keep refusing to answer. You and your party are nothing but defeatists who thrive on making the U.S. look bad. I just looked at the url you posted. Only someone of your hateful nature would be associated with a site named "savetheusa". How pathetic.


I have used some material from experts that you could choose to disagree with however, saying experts such as Greenspan, O'Neil, and the various academic experts I sight do not know what they are talking about just shows your ignorance. I did not sight OFF THE WALL experts or organizations.


Col, I can post articles from "experts" that say Saddam was a threat and had WMD's. Would you believe them since they are "experts"?


If the people of Iraq do not end the violence then so be it. Let them kill each other.


There is that compassion again.
on May 22, 2006
IslandDogI have no reason to either like or dislike the Iraqi People. All I have said is I do not support sending OUR Military to fight and die for Iraq. They kill each other in the name of the same religion without thought. That is NOT WORTH American lives or Tax dollars.

Your experts that said Saddam had WMD and was a threat were DEAD WRONG. So much for the quality of your experts.

At no time did you prove my data to be incorrect. The jobs data is very clear. We created 5 million jobs and to be even numbers wise we would have needed to have created 6.5 Million new jobs. The new jobs that are being created on the average pay 21% less then the jobs that were lost and have fewer benefits. Unemployment rate is 4.7% and it was 3.9% at the end of 2000. If you believe that is a good job performance you have a very different outlook then I have. A shortage of 1.5 Million jobs and jobs that pay much less with fewer benefits does not should good to me. Real wages are LOWER then in 2001 so what are you crowing about?



on May 22, 2006
Your experts that said Saddam had WMD and was a threat were DEAD WRONG. So much for the quality of your experts.


Actually they weren't col. Saddam still has WMD's that are unaccounted for by the U.N. Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Ted Kennedy told me Iraq was a threat. They wouldn't lie, would they?

At no time did you prove my data to be incorrect.


Yes I did col. You haven't presented the facts.


If you believe that is a good job performance you have a very different outlook then I have. A shortage of 1.5 Million jobs and jobs that pay much less with fewer benefits does not should good to me. Real wages are LOWER then in 2001 so what are you crowing about?


Col, the unemployment rate in this country is very low. It would be lower if people would stop relying on entitlements and get out there and work. Besides that, the job outlook is good. Only democrats want you to think otherwise.


We also said then that there's evidence on both sides of the good-jobs, bad-jobs debate, that there's no economic data detailed enough to settle the matter, and that economists disagree about whether job quality is improving or not. All that continues to be true.


Partisans all use the same data from the BLS, but arrive at opposite conclusions. The Republican staff of the Joint Economic Committee of Congress issued a news release July 7, comparing occupations (such as managers) rather than industries (such as the restaurant business) The GOP economists found BLS data showing 71% of the job growth in the past year was among three higher-paid groups: managers, constructions trades and repair/maintenance occupations. Economist Bosworth said those figures are just as misleading as Kerry's, since no BLS figures can match each job lost against each new job.

on May 22, 2006
House and Senate GOP conferees finally agreed yesterday on extending the 15% tax rate on dividends and capital gains for two more years through 2010. This means you can expect lots of media and liberal rhetoric about "the deficit" and "the rich," but the real news is how well these lower rates have been soaking the rich to fill government coffers.

The latest evidence is Treasury's monthly budget report for May that tax receipts were up by $137 billion, or a remarkable 11.2%, for the first seven months of Fiscal 2006 through April. That's more than triple the inflation rate. And it comes on top of the $274 billion, or 14.6%, increase in federal revenues for all of Fiscal 2005, which ended last September 30.

These columns have been documenting this trend for the last couple of years, as well as the revenue tide flowing into state budget coffers. Overall state revenues climbed by 8% in 2004 and nearly 9% in 2005, according to the Census Bureau, and more and more states are piling up big surpluses. We've reported this news because politicians like to disguise these tax windfalls so they can spend it all with impunity and still plead poverty. Journalists contribute to this ruse by focusing their budget coverage on deficits, rather than on the spending and revenue trends that are the actual components of any budget.

The current revenue rush also refutes the prevailing Washington consensus that the federal deficit is the result of the Bush tax cuts. In fact, this revenue tsunami is the direct result of the expansion that took off in earnest at about the time the 2003 tax cuts passed. Lower tax rates have since had precisely the result that supporters predicted, though don't look for that story on page one any time...




http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114722545735348501.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks
on May 22, 2006
What is taking place is more lower paying jobs are being created. If you think that is good fot this country, you and I disagree.



And you haven't proved that col. Just more talk about your non-selling book. If you think an unemployment rate of under %5 is bad, then you really are crazy.


There is NO WMD that in any war placed the United States in Danger. Your experts were full of SH*T. Saddam was NO militart threat and had NO capability to attack this country in March 2003. The Iraq


Col, the democrats said Iraq had WMD's and were a threat. They would never lie.

19 people with boxcutters weren't a threat either, but they pulled it off. Keep goign with your anti-American BS.
on May 22, 2006
I said the unemployment rate in 2000 was 3.9% which is correct. It is 4.7% today which is slightly higher. The quality of the jobs is also important. What is taking place is more lower paying jobs are being created. If you think that is good for this country, you and I disagree.

There is no disagreement that average weekly wages are DOWN. The study I sighted is very comprehensive and did document that the new jobs are paying LESS with FEWER BENEFITS>

There is NO WMD that in any war placed the United States in Danger. Your experts were full of SH*T. Saddam was NO military threat and had NO capability to attack this country in March 2003. The Iraq war was something Bush wanted to do and lied about WMD to get Congress to approve the war.
6 Pages1 2 3 4  Last