Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.

Anyone who claims to care about our military can not support what George W. Bush has done to them. I just read the new TIME article about what Bush has done to our Army. Training has been cut short so the added troops could be rushed to Iraq. Equipment is not available or is not working properly. Units are being sent back after ONLY 9 Months and National Guard Units are being sent for a second tour.


The Bush budget does not contain enough money to operate the Army and the Army Chief of Staff was told to sell the need for more money to Congress. The cost to provide retention bonuses went from $180 Million in 2003 to $600 Million in 2006. There is no prospect to add the 65,000 increased Army strength that was finally approved. Wavers to include felony convictions have more then doubled!

From EVERY aspect, the Commander-in-Chief is destroying the Active Army, Army National Guard and Army Reserve. He is doing the same thing to the U.S. Marines! If you support the troops you can not continue to support GWB.

Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 19, 2007
In places where Bush should have used his Veto on all the PORK the Congress passed when the GOP controlled it he signed EVERY BILL.


I love the hypocrisy you spout. In one sentence you say he should have vetoed the pork in the bill when the republicans were in the “majority” but now that democrats have the majority he should respect the majority and not veto the pork and the unconstitutional limits on the president’s power that is okay with you. You are a political hack! Which way do you want it or do you just want your party in power? The vast majority as you call it put Mr. Bush in office and you did not respect that majority but now he is supposed to respect the idiots that have a slim majority. Keep in your twisted little mind that Mr. Clinton won with a smaller margin of victory than Mr. Bush both times so don't hand that majority crap to me.


"Still" wrong, eh col?
on Apr 20, 2007
drmiler

NO I am CORRECT. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
on Apr 20, 2007
drmiler

NO I am CORRECT. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!


No You are NOT CORRECT! You CAN'T refute any of Paladin77's replies.
on Apr 20, 2007
No You are NOT CORRECT! You CAN'T refute any of Paladin77's replies.


Once in a while he makes a minor point but usually he can't answer what I write and usually ignores me and jumps on you because he can rant without saying anythiing. He is good at punching your buttons. Thanks for your support.
on Apr 21, 2007
He is good at punching your buttons. Thanks for your support.


He punches my buttons because of his basic non-knowledge on most given subjects, his inability to even admit when he's wrong, etc, etc....
You're welcome by the way.
I guess he can't help being a moron. It must come naturally.
on Apr 23, 2007
drmiler

NO I am CORRECT. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!


Giving up on the arguement col? Wassa matta....you chicken?
on Apr 23, 2007
drmiler

NO I am CORRECT. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!


Giving up on the arguement col? Wassa matta....you chicken?
on Apr 23, 2007
drmiler

NO I am CORRECT. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!


Giving up on the arguement col? Wassa matta....you chicken?
3 Pages1 2 3