Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on October 7, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics



The U.S. Constitution is the foundation for our rights and essential for the success of our nation. The federal government was brought into existence by the people through our Constitution. Second, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land that controls the actions of our public officials in all three branches of the federal government. Every elected official swears to UPHOLD the U.S. Constitution. The very foundations of Our Constitution are being violated by the highest elected officials in America and we are allowing this travesty to take place.

The most basic principal upon which the rights of our system are based is the Separation of Powers. This was intended to split and therefore limit the power of each of the three branches of our government. That principal, which was set out by our founding fathers, can not be violated if our government is to protect the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Two powers granted to Congress and ONLY to Congress by our Constitution are the power to Declare War and the Power of the Budget. Both of these Congressional responsibilities have been usurped by President Bush. In the case of the budget, Bush has been allowed to establish his spending priorities and the Congress has in effect abdicated their responsibility to set the spending. The most recent example is the S-CHIP funding which Congress passed in a bipartisan vote. Bush has vetoed that decision by Congress which is an abuse of his veto power. If Congress does not override this veto Bush and NOT Congress, as the Constitution Requires, will set the spending policy of our country. Once the majority of Congress chooses a spending level, they have a responsibility to insure that it is established and must override any Presidential veto to insure their constitutional responsibility is met.

What does our Constitution say about war? Our Founders divided war into two separate powers: Congress was given the power to declare war and the president was given the power to wage war. What that means is that under our system of government, the president cannot legally wage war against another nation in the absence of a declaration of war against that nation from Congress. When Congress passed the Iraq War Resolution they delegated that Constitutional power to declare war to the President. There is NO provision in our Constitution to delegate that power to the President. When Congress passed this clearly unconstitutional law, a case should have been initiated to challenge that Iraq War Resolution. No such action was undertaken and the third branch of our government, our courts, was unable to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to insure Congress and the President do not act outside the Constitution.

In both these examples George W. Bush violated his oath of office. Every time Congress does not insure their decision on the budget is enacted they fail their responsibility. The Iraq war resolution is a failure of first Congress then Bush and finally by the fact that a case was not brought to the Federal Courts to challenge the Iraq war Resolution. Technically the Courts did not violate their constitutional responsibility because they can only exercise that power WHEN a case has been initiated. Thus the fact that no case was brought to challenge the action of Congress to delegate a power only Congress can exercise was because no American choose to challenge the resolution in court. I for one believe that such a suit should be brought today to make it clear for the future that ONLY Congress has the power to declare war. Congress DID NOT declare war against Iraq. On December 8, 1941 Congress did not say to President Roosevelt he had the power to declare war against Japan, Germany or Italy. Congress DECLARED WAR and that enabled President Roosevelt to act under his power as Commander-in-Chief. That is NOT what took place in Iraq. Bush acted as both the Congress and as Commander-in-Chief.

We need to STOP the destruction of our Constitution by the President or Congress. The first step in that quest is to tell Congress they and not Bush need to set the spending of the United States. The second action is to bring a case that challenges the Iraq War Resolution which continues today to be the authority by which Bush continues the Iraq War. There is no greater danger then to allow the President or Congress to violate our Constitution!

Comments (Page 3)
9 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Oct 08, 2007
Looks like even Penn State, Lehigh & the AWC can make mistakes.
on Oct 08, 2007
Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Monday, October 08, 2007
Looks like even Penn State, Lehigh & the AWC can make mistakes. Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!
on Oct 08, 2007
Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!


who handed him the governership of texas or the presidency of the united states twice.
on Oct 08, 2007
Daddy, of course. And Clarence Thomas. That whole voting thing was just a charade.
on Oct 09, 2007
A presidency that is a complete disaster with the lowest approval ratings since Nixon.


But you just said it wasn't him? Make up your mind Col.
on Oct 09, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, October 08, 2007
“Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!


Who handed him the governorship of Texas or the presidency of the United States twice.” DADDY and Daddy’s contacts.


First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever had the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts. Bush had NO experience that warranted him being a Governor and certainly not President. If anyone else with the exact record as Bush but without the contacts would have attempted to run for governor or president they would have gotten NO WARE!

As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore and because the confusing design in Palm Beach County FL ballot caused 3,500 votes not to be counted. This has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court decision about a recount. It has to do with a ballot in one Fl County that confused voters and they double punched their ballots. Had that county used the same ballot design as the other 67 Fl Counties, those votes would have been counted and Bush would not have won FL. The issue is simple-- HAD the votes in Palm beach County been counted as voters intended, Bush would not have won Florida and would not be President!
on Oct 09, 2007
First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever had the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts.


wrong clinton was a draft dodger.
on Oct 09, 2007
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.
on Oct 09, 2007
because the confusing design in Palm Beach County FL ballot caused 3,500 votes not to be counted.


this was designed by the democrats because it wasn't confusing.
on Oct 09, 2007
and the ones who were really disenfrancized were the people living in the other half of florida.


you know the ones in the other time zone. who went home without voting because the media was telling everone that florida had already gone to al gore.
on Oct 09, 2007
as for the courts being brought in that was done by AL gore. he didn't want to follow the constitution, which states that all ties are broken by the senate, the reason is because the senate was controlled by the republicans. this vote is one of the few which is majority.
on Oct 09, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
“First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever have the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts.


Wrong clinton was a draft dodger.”

Clinton was also and accomplished lawyer, a governor that did not become governor because of his daddy’s contacts and a brilliant student.


Yes Clinton and Cheney were BOTH draft doggers. Bush was worse. He got Daddy to get him a Commission he did not earn or deserve to keep his ass out of Vietnam. Then when the requirements of the military conflicted with what Bush wanted he disobeyed orders and regulations when he refused to take the required physical. That resulted in him being grounded and then he was given an honorable Discharge HE DID deserve.
on Oct 09, 2007




Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.

LIE At no time was Bush ahead of Gore in the total vote count!
on Oct 09, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.

LIE At no time was Bush ahead of Gore in the total vote count!


Our presidents are not decided by popular vote, Col. They're decided by the ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

Too bad in all your schooling you never took a course in civics.
on Oct 09, 2007
Bush wanted he disobeyed orders and regulations when he refused to take the required physical.


this has been proven to be lies.
9 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last