Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on December 21, 2007 By COL Gene In Pure Technology


In my book, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich I talk about the need to shift to laser type weapons rather then the point to point star wars systems Bush has been pushing. In June 2007, Scientific American had an article about the development of the Beam type weapons that use solid-state lasers that can produce a beam of 100 kilowatts.

The systems would have an “infinite magazine” of low cost shots that could be used to destroy incoming artillery and mortars shells, missiles, detonate mines and blind electro-optical and infrared sensors. The new lasers run on electricity and can be used as both offensive and defensive weapons. This weapon could revolutionize the battle field of the future according to this article. These weapons could be used from the ground, ships or from the air. They would be capable of attacking targets many kilometers away at the speed of light and can even operate through fog and dust.

The recent successes indicate that these weapons systems may not be far from fielding and their potential is significant. Below is the excerpt from my book on this subject.

Page 68 of my book:


“We need to discontinue development of the point-to-point anti-missile system. This system has an estimated cost of approximately $100 billion which does not count the large ongoing expense of maintaining and operating the system. The system has proven unreliable in almost half of the tests to date and provides very limited benefits in terms of a defensive system. (Recent tests have been more encouraging but the one shot limited application is a continuing short coming). First, the system can only be used against incoming missiles as a one time application. If the missile we launch does not disable or destroy the enemy incoming missile, there is no second chance option. In addition, the system cannot be used against other types of targets like water or ground targets.


The money from discontinuing this point to point missile defense system should be used to help develop the airborne laser system. This application utilizes a 747 as a generator and powerful laser weapon that can be used against incoming missiles on a repeated basis as well as on air, land or sea targets. It has far greater flexibility and application than the point-to-point Star Wars system and should be the primary anti missile weapons system.”

Comments
on Dec 21, 2007

With all the money that's already been spent on the existing system, would it maybe be a good idea to keep it alive but scale back the spending on it? Yes, it's not perfect but there have been some intercepts, and with all the energy and time poured into it, should we try to make it work or is it a write off? Maybe we could have a two-tier system, deploying both point to point anti-missile missiles and beam weapons in the hopes that one would intercept if the other failed- or that one would at least thin out the number of incoming so that the better system would have better odds of taking down the remaining?

The big question that I have is about a tactical anti-ship missile the soviets developed called the "sunburn"- Nato designation, or "Moskit" (mosquitoe) soviet designation I think. It's believed that this missile is capable of getting past any existing naval screen including the Aegis system and the navy has openly admitted that they don't have an answer for it- an aircraft carrier group is extremely vulnerable...so much so that they don't want to build any more carriers until they can come up with a viable counter-measure. Traditional Exocet missiles can theoretically be detected and tracked with about 120-150 seconds of lead time for the defender to try a few things. With the sunburn it's estimated the defender will only have about 20-30 seconds, which is pretty much enough time to fill one's pants.

It's supersonic... mach 3 high altitude, M 2.2 low altitude which is still pretty damn fast. It uses active radar and other goodies to hug the deck on approach so as to limit detection time to as short as possible AND on final approach it engages in evasive maneuvers. And the Iranians have bought these missiles from the russians, making it so that they can pretty much shut down the straights of Hormuz anytime they want. Sending any warships in the area would be suicide until all of these missiles could be neutralized! Would a computer controlled beam weapon be the way to go in trying to counter this?

on Dec 21, 2007
Would a computer controlled beam weapon be the way to go in trying to counter this?


If this system which is powered by electricity and can be refried any number of times I would think it could be used against anything. The beam travels at the speed of light which us infinitely faster than any missile. The issue has been the ability to produce a beam of 100 megawatts or greater and it looks as if this is now possible from what the Article said. However, I am sure some of the data is classified. My point was that the old star wars system that Bush has put so much money into in a one shot system that will have a very high operational cost. It also has limited capability and the beam weapons are far more flexible and so fast that if it were fired and missed the target it could be employed many more times which should increase the chance of destroying any target.
on Dec 21, 2007
Bush was responsible for the Star Wars program? DAMN that Ronald Reagan for going forward in time, stealing George W. Bush's idea, then going backwards in time and claiming it! We REALLY need to control the time machine. After all, Bill Clinton did the exact same thing with NAFTA!

So let's see now, the things we can assume about Bush, based on your post are:

1. He's omnipresent (he should have been on the scene at every disaster).

2. He's omniscient (he should have known there were no WMD's in Iraq, despite evidence to the contrary).

3. He's omnipotent (he can singlehandedly change the course of world events).

4. He's eternal (he was around to affect events that happened long before he held power).

You sure YOU aren't the one that seems to think Bush is a god?
on Dec 21, 2007

Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Friday, December 21, 2007
Bush was responsible for the Star Wars program? DAMN that Ronald Reagan for going forward in time, stealing George W. Bush's idea, then going backwards in time and claiming it! We REALLY need to control the time machine. After all, Bill Clinton did the exact same thing with NAFTA!

Bush spent Billions on Star Wars and BORROWED EVERY CENT. It is a VERY limited system both from the types of targets it can be used on and its ability to deal with large numbers of missiles. It also will cost a fortune to field and maintain the system. The Beam weapons are far more flexible and effective.

Bush had the benefit of seeing that NAFTA which Clinton started DID NOT WORK and went ahead and expanded it and made the trade deficit two time as large and sent more jobs outside the country. When you see that a program does not work, you do not continue it much less expand it.



So let's see now, the things we can assume about Bush, based on your post are:

1. He's omnipresent (he should have been on the scene at every disaster). He should have acted on the warnings by the CIA that Bin Laden was about to attack the U.S. from March to Sept 2001. He IGNORED the direst warnings the CIA and Tenet could have given! Bush watched Katrina on TV and has failed to help keep his pormise to do what ever it takes to rebuild New Orleans.

2. He's omniscient (he should have known there were no WMD in Iraq, despite evidence to the contrary). He IGNORED ANY and ALL Intel that did not support what he decided he wanted to do. There was bad Intel there was also a lot of Intel that said BEFORE we invaded that he did not have the WMD Bush and Cheney claimed- Nuclear and BIO weapons.

3. He's omnipotent (he can single-handedly change the course of world events). He acted to invade a country that had NOTHING to do with the attack on our country on 9/11 and did not effectively deal with the country that did plan the attack because the Bulk of our deployed forces are in that country that was not responsible for 9/11. WHY?

4. He's eternal (he was around to affect events that happened long before he held power). He learned NOTHING from history and IGNORED the advice of those who had a far better understanding of how an invasion of Iraq would turn out! He IGNORED the best military experts as to what resources it took to secure Iraq after Saddam fell. That refusal to follow the advice of our military is responsible for MOST of the dead and injured Americans.

YES BUSH is a SCREW UP at just about everything. He is arrogant and incompetent. He fails to learn from the past or accept the advice of those with the knowledge and experience he did not have. He is the WORST PRESIDENT in our history and the harm he has done will take decades to fix and will haunt many future presidents!
on Dec 22, 2007

It is truly sad Gene.  You had a clear, concise, intelligently written article here.  You made you major points well, and I was ready to write something about how right you are.

Then you destroyed every bit of credibility for yourself once again my making it into a Bush Bash.  So whatever I was going to say in support of your point isn't worth saying... You are just a pathetic little hatemonger.

 

on Dec 23, 2007
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007It is truly sad Gene. You had a clear, concise, intelligently written article here. You made you major points well, and I was ready to write something about how right you are.Then you destroyed every bit of credibility for yourself once again my making it into a Bush Bash. So whatever I was going to say in support of your point isn't worth saying... You are just a pathetic little hatemonger.


It is not a Bush Bash. It is a statement of what Bush has done and what he supports. You are the one that has determined it does not reflect well on Bush. YOU ARE THE BUSH BASHER!
on Dec 23, 2007
"I'm going to put a laser on the moon, and I'm going to call it the 'Death Star'."

*Ripoff!*
on Dec 23, 2007
Reply By: SanChoninoPosted: Sunday, December 23, 2007"I'm going to put a laser on the moon, and I'm going to call it the 'Death Star'."*Ripoff!*


You can have Cheney sent to the moon and run it!
on Dec 24, 2007
YES BUSH is a SCREW UP at just about everything. He is arrogant and incompetent. He fails to learn from the past or accept the advice of those with the knowledge and experience he did not have. He is the WORST PRESIDENT in our history and the harm he has done will take decades to fix and will haunt many future presidents!


Oh, sorry, I guess this part wasn't anywhere in your article... lying oaf.

on Dec 24, 2007
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, December 24, 2007
YES BUSH is a SCREW UP at just about everything. He is arrogant and incompetent. He fails to learn from the past or accept the advice of those with the knowledge and experience he did not have. He is the WORST PRESIDENT in our history and the harm he has done will take decades to fix and will haunt many future presidents!
Oh, sorry, I guess this part wasn't anywhere in your article... lying oaf.


YOU WILL NOT find this in my Blog!!!!! It was response to this BS:

Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Friday, December 21, 2007
Bush was responsible for the Star Wars program? DAMN that Ronald Reagan for going forward in time, stealing George W. Bush's idea, then going backwards in time and claiming it! We REALLY need to control the time machine. After all, Bill Clinton did the exact same thing with NAFTA!

So let's see now, the things we can assume about Bush, based on your post are:

1. He's omnipresent (he should have been on the scene at every disaster).

2. He's omniscient (he should have known there were no WMD's in Iraq, despite evidence to the contrary).

3. He's omnipotent (he can singlehandedly change the course of world events).

4. He's eternal (he was around to affect events that happened long before he held power).

You sure YOU aren't the one that seems to think Bush is a god?