Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.




An unintended consequence of George W. Bush’s Iraq war policy is for rogue states, who fear a U S invasion, to move quickly and acquire nuclear weapons. That was the conclusion of a Republican strategist who appeared on the Chris Matthews show this evening.

His contention was very simple. If you’re the dictator of a rogue state who wants protection against an Iraq like invasion obtain a handful of nuclear weapons. Although this was not the initial rationale for countries like North Korea and Iran to seek these weapons it does make sense, given the Bush preemptive attack policy, to secure a small number of nuclear weapons to deter any such attack in the future by the United States. Great going Mr.Bush!

Comments (Page 3)
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5 
on May 10, 2005
More and more discussion is turning to the question of whether or not the U S will need to relook at the Draft!


Nobody is looking at a draft. The only mention of a draft was a stupid idea that was brought up by a democrat to scare people.

Tell that to the 300+ peoples' families who have died in the past 12 days. Or to the thousands who were maimed from the continual bombings.


Stop acting like you care so much. When where you protesting Saddam murdered people and putting them in mass graves? When was the last anti-Saddam protest you attended? Do you know about the good things that are going on in Iraq, or do you just watch the first 30 seconds of CNN and that's it?

new poppy fields in Afghanistan
nuclear proliferation in Iran
puppet governments whom the people had no idea who they were voting for
Wow! All kinds of amazing shit.


This is the typical lefist wacko line. If it isn't perfect than it's just not worth it. Aside from your other bs, your "puppet" government theory is just false. Millions of people came out to vote, and they knew who they voted for.
errrrrr............
population reduction
demolished cities
No water
sporadic electricity


It's obvious you don't know half of what is going on in Iraq. Your exaggerations are far from reality. I will ask again, do you ever take the time to read about the good things that are going on? I doubt it.

You're right. I don't see the amazingly wonderful things you're seeing. But then again, I don't watch FAUX FOX News or listen to druggy limbaugh.


You don't see it because you don't look for it. You know dabe, you are the typical wacko. Blame Fox News, oil wars, and insulting Limbaugh. Is there a factory that you nuts come from?
on May 11, 2005
Time will tell, dog. Today, another series of bombs went off in Iraq. Sixty plus more dead Iraqis. Hundreds more injured. I love your definition of success. If this was happening to your family, I don't think you'd be happy.

Fact is, Saddam was a sadistic dictator. I won't disagree with you there. But, bringing on this massive deadly chaos to eradicate him was/is criminal. It didn't have to be this way. Bush and company are war criminals, and history will not judge them kindly. Or any of his followers, including you, either.
on May 11, 2005
More people have died in Iraq since the war started than Saddam is reported to have killed. I do not see the control element getting better. If anyhting it is getting worse. We have now committed $300 Billion and over 1,600 American lives as well as 35,000 injured military members to this war. How much more will it take? It is NOT WORTH THE PRICE!
on May 11, 2005
More people have died in Iraq since the war started than Saddam is reported to have killed. I do not see the control element getting better. If anyhting it is getting worse. We have now committed $300 Billion and over 1,600 American lives as well as 35,000 injured military members to this war. How much more will it take? It is NOT WORTH THE PRICE!


Knock off the BS *col*. Saddam is "reported" to have killed 50,000 people per year!
on May 11, 2005
Bush and company are war criminals, and history will not judge them kindly. Or any of his followers, including you, either.


Actually not. History will show that Iraq was liberated and democracy will begin in the Middle East. History will judge people like you who would rather have Saddam in power and people in tyranny.


More people have died in Iraq since the war started than Saddam is reported to have killed.


That is just false.
on May 11, 2005
Whether or not we see a democracy in Iraq will take time to determine. I can remember that in Vietnam we were told if the South Vietnam fell to the Communists it would be a domino effect on the whole Southeast Asian region. We paid dearly for that idea 58,000 dead and hundreds of thousands injured. South Vietnam fell and the region not not go to hell in a hand basket.

We need to learn that we are not the world's policeman. It is not our responsibility to remove all the evil dictators in this world. We attacked Iraq and it posed no threat to the United States to satisfy President Bush and his neocons. We were told a line of crap about how easy it was going to be, how well received we were going to be, how the oil revenue was going to pay the cost, and how clean and neat it was going to be. In fact Bush told the Pope when he objected to our going into Iraq not to worry this is going to be quick and clean war. We'll Mr. Bush isn't quick isn't clean it's far from over. I believe history is going to judge our actions very harshly just the way it has in Vietnam.
on May 11, 2005
We need to learn that we are not the world's policeman. It is not our responsibility to remove all the evil dictators in this world. We attacked Iraq and it posed no threat to the United States to satisfy President Bush and his neocons.


Then who is going to be? France maybe?

You just cannot ignore dictators and terrorists and hope they "go away". The U.N. is not capable of taking care of the world, and in some cases like Saddam, actually help them.
on May 11, 2005
It is not our responsibility to remove all the evil dictators in this world.


--COL, then who will, if we as americans, "the land of the free", then why shouldn't we, along with democracy loving nations around the world, free those countries that are controlled by evil dictators who slaughter opposition [free thinking] or their own citizens just cause their ethnicity....hmmm? WHO? Or would you have us be snub, and ignore them, like a majority of other nations when people where killed[and someplaces they're still being killed] by mass genocide...WTF?


South Vietnam fell and the region not not go to hell in a hand basket.


--Things didn't get exactly better....

on May 11, 2005
d'oh, didn't see ID's response......
on May 11, 2005
I found the transcript from Monday Night's episode of "Hardball" folks.
NOTE: THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED. - from the MSNBC website

John Fund is a reporter for the Wall Street Journal. This is what i think the COL is referring to (again, correct me if i'm wrong)

MATTHEWS: John Fund, let me ask you about North Korea.

SHRUM: That came out rather well.

FUND: I agree.

MATTHEWS: North Korea, what do you think? What are we going to be able to do over there, now that they‘re apparently setting up grandstands to hold a test of a nuclear device over there and they want the world to see it?

FUND: Chris, I‘m the first to admit that there are some unintended consequences of something like the Iraq war.

I think what the Iraq war and the collapse of Saddam Hussein—he is now going to be in the dock at a trial—told all of the rogue states, if you don‘t want a U.S. invasion, you better get some nuclear weapons. And I don‘t think we were about to invade other countries, but I think they might have thought we were. So, the North Koreans have moved forward. They want their insurance policy, so they can blackmail the Western nations.

And the Chinese are not cooperating. We asked the Chinese to shut off oil shipments to North Korea last week. They said no. The Chinese have apparently decided—I think this is a big mistake on their part—that a nuclear North Korea is acceptable in the region.

MATTHEWS: Oh, that‘s frightening.

FUND: I don‘t think they‘re going to like the Japanese reaction.

MATTHEWS: That‘s very frightening for everybody.
on May 11, 2005
Reply #40 By: thatoneguyinslc - 5/11/2005 9:33:29 AM


--Interesting, a Nuclear NK, it could lead to some interesting happenings, and about japan's response, they're probably going to go ballistic...
on May 11, 2005
Thank you Thatoneguyinsic

That was the exchange that I was talking about in my blog. There have been others that have held the same idea.
on May 11, 2005
I don't base my opinions on what a reporter thinks.
on May 11, 2005
Like i have said. We have to convince, or force China via economic sanctions and or other econimic means to throw a rope around NK.
on May 11, 2005
John Fund is a reporter for the Wall Street Journal.


I thought it was a Repbulican strategest. Anyways, I see the "opinoins" of journalists everywhere, doesn't make them an authority on anything.
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5