Bush is a Buffoon

Published on December 15, 2005 By COL Gene In Politics

Yesterday George W. Bush, out of his own mouth, documented that he is a Buffoon!
For the very first time he admitted he took this country to war, the most important decision any president can make, based on faulty information. These are the Presidentâ own words, "It is true that much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong. As President I'm responsible for the decision to go into Iraq."BR>
That would have been an important admission had Bush stopped there. However what followed is hard to believe. His next statement was, "Saddam was a threat and the American people and the world is better off because he is no longer in power."BR>
If the information that said he was a danger was incorrect as the President admitted, how was Saddam a threat? What possible justification for going to war existed with a country that did not have the means to be a threat? There are many tyrants in this world that wish others harm. They are NOT a threat if they do not have the means of being a danger.

Even when Bush admits he was wrong, according to him he was right. How foolish Bush make himself look. This great country deserves a leader that can take responsibility for their mistakes not one that acts like GWB.

Comments (Page 4)

COL Gene

on Dec 15, 2005

Saudi Arabia is a special Bush Family Friend. They provided the money for the two companies Bush ran into the ground. They were the ONLY group that was allowed to leave the U S in the days after 9/11. They teach Hate for Americans in their schools.

stevendedalus

on Dec 15, 2005

Baffoon Daiwa

play on words--baboon-buffoon combo?

You exhaust old history; confine your arguments to now, like the following:

Today more then in the past to control something as vast as the terrorism requires the help of many countries- Intel, Financial information, communications etc. If there was a time when we should be trying to cooperate it is now.

I'll buy into that.

COL Gene

on Dec 15, 2005

Allowing them to leave the US after 9/11 is the NOW

drmiler

on Dec 15, 2005

Explain what Dr Millar? How on earth does your quote refute the quote you took from Col G? Where in your quote is there a figure given? A mass grave is a grave with more than a few people in it. So 10 for instance.

Thats hardly millions. Frankly the explaination is dead simple

Since you are either "slow" or "stupid", I don't know which. let me clue you in:

Iraq's Legacy of Terror: Mass Graves

Download the report in PDF format
Since the Saddam Hussein regime was overthrown in May, 270 mass graves have been reported. By mid-January, 2004, the number of confirmed sites climbed to fifty-three. Some graves hold a few dozen bodies—their arms lashed together and the bullet holes in the backs of skulls testimony to their execution. Other graves go on for hundreds of meters, densely packed with thousands of bodies.

"We've already discovered just so far the remains of 400,000 people in mass graves," said British Prime Minister Tony Blair on November 20 in London. The United Nations, the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch (HRW) all estimate that Saddam Hussein's regime murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent people. "Human Rights Watch estimates that as many as 290,000 Iraqis have been 'disappeared' by the Iraqi government over the past two decades," said the group in a statement in May. "Many of these 'disappeared' are those whose remains are now being unearthed in mass graves all over Iraq."

Is that better or do you need me to draw it in crayon for you as usual? Quite a few more than just 10.

Daiwa

on Dec 15, 2005

Allowing them to leave the US after 9/11 is the NOW

You should visit Roswell, Gene. I suspect you'd feel quite at home there.

stevendedalus -

You'll need to ask BenUser for the official definition. I just like adopting the idiotic labels thrown at us when the only arrow left in the quiver is arrogant disdain.

Cheers,
Daiwa

drmiler

on Dec 15, 2005

Oh REALLY? Then please explain this! That is "if" you can:

Explain what Dr Millar? How on earth does your quote refute the quote you took from Col G? Where in your quote is there a figure given? A mass grave is a grave with more than a few people in it. So 10 for instance.

Thats hardly millions. Frankly the explaination is dead simple

Or maybe this link is better for you. It has "pictures" of the mass graves and they contain a LOT more than 10 people. You know, if you're going to call me on something that's fine. But do "try" to have your facts straight before you do.

MythicalMino

on Dec 16, 2005

If GWB had been President on Dec 7, 1941 he would have invaded China. After they are all Orientals.

If Col Gene had been President on Dec 7, 1941, he would have surrendered on Dec 8, 1941, and America would now be a part of the Great Imperial Japan

Leauki

on Dec 16, 2005

If GWB had been President on Dec 7, 1941 he would have invaded China. After they are all Orientals.

Invaded China? You got your history wrong. The Japanese were the fascists.

Manopeace

on Dec 16, 2005

Yes I disagree that "Saddam was a threat".

Shooting missles at Israel does not count as a threat? Killing innocent Kurds does not count as a threat?
I think you have some soul searching to do... OK... I agree tht the US should not be in Iraq today, BUT Sadaam was a threat.

Manopeace

on Dec 16, 2005

Give me a link that documents he killed millions.

If he killed only ONE he is a threat!

Leauki

on Dec 16, 2005

Manopeace has a point.

Saddam killed many people for no reason other than that he didn't like them. Even if he had killed only one person for that reason (and no other), he would be a threat.

Many people tend to forget that we must all work together to defend ourselves against people like Saddam. To say that he is not a threat to the US because he only fires missiles at Israel is just another example for the truth of pastor Niemoeller's famous saying.

And that ignores the fact that he also targeted British and American aircraft.

Manopeace

on Dec 16, 2005

Manopeace has a point.

Well, thank you Andrew... this is the first time we agreed on anything! There is hope yet!

COL Gene

on Dec 16, 2005

Drmiler

You have NOT given proof that Saddam killed "Millions" We all agree that Saddam was an evil person just like many other in this world. The reason Bush gave to invade Iraq was because HE WAS A DANGER TO THE UNITED STATES! How does him attacking Israel or killing his own people endanger the US? If that were true what about North Korea, Iran, Seria and many countries in Africa. They kill their own people and attack other countries. Some of them have the WMD that Saddam did not have like Iran and North Korea..

On December 8, 1941 I would have done just like we did by attacking those that were a danger to the United States not by attack another country and use up our military power on the wrong country like Bush did in Iraq.

Leauki

on Dec 16, 2005

Had the US attacked Japan once it was clear that Japan was a threat (to anybody!), the US could have saved a lot of American and foreign lives (not that there is a difference between them).

Island Dog

on Dec 16, 2005

They were the ONLY group that was allowed to leave the U S in the days after 9/11.

That is a lie col. In fact, it's a Michael Moore lie. I see now that you do in fact get your "facts" from people like Michael Moore and liberal websites.

That conspiracy theory has been debunked so many times col, but that doesn't matter right?

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!