Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.


The drive of North Korea and Iraq to acquire nuclear weapons is not to attack the United States but to prevent the United States or any other country from attacking them. It is true that both North Korea and Iran were trying to acquire nuclear weapons long before Bush invaded Iraq. However the preemptive invasion and willingness to affect regime change by force has increased the desire of these two countries to obtain a small supply of these weapons. There is no question, if Iran or North Korea are successful in acquiring these weapons, they are far safer from attack by the United States. Now we have North Korea conducting a nuclear test. What Next?

When we look at the direction our foreign policy is taking it is clear we are moving into a MORE not LESS dangerous time in history. It does not matter where you look. Relations with our traditional friends have been strained by our policy. The Middle-east is a disaster and the problems in the Americas is clearly evident.


To give Bush and his Foreign Policy team a grade of a D- would be kind!

Comments (Page 7)
7 PagesFirst 5 6 7 
on Oct 15, 2006
As I have told you the analyst is not retired and his name was not released. That does not alter that he has 30 years of experience studying North Korea. CNN does not lie. Bush is the one who does not tell us the truth!


And just "how" were you able to "verify" his 30 year experience? You weren't able to were you? So it DOES alter the fact. In the "real world" unverifiable experience counts for zip. Just try to get a job using unverifiable experience. It ain't gonna happen.


Fawaz Gerges a scholar


And just who is this supposed scholar? Why am I unable to find "anything" on him?
on Oct 15, 2006
Drmiler


CNN provided the information that the Analyst had 30 years of experience studying North Korea.

Fawaz Gerges was on Google. He is a Professor of Middle East Studies at The College of New York. The British General is Sir Richard Dannatt, Chief of the General Staff. He would be the same as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in the U.S. The British TOP General says that the presents of foreign troops are ADDING to the violence in Iraq and should be removed.

I guess these three do not know what they are talking about since they disagree with Bush.
on Oct 15, 2006
CNN provided the information that the Analyst had 30 years of experience studying North Korea


And like I'm supposed to believe CNN? Not in this lifetime. This boils down to a "they say", as in "they say" he's an expert. Sorry but without "verifiable" proof. I ain't buying it!
on Oct 15, 2006
What is you excuse for Professor Gerges and General Dannatt?
on Oct 16, 2006
What is you excuse for Professor Gerges


Give me a break will ya? He's a g*d damned "ABC" analyst for Christ sake! So I think we can safely assume where his political standings are.



Professor Gerges has also made several appearances on "The Charlie Rose Show," often with only one guest, to discuss jihadi Islam, Al Qaeda, and America's relations with the Muslim world. Again, his book was mentioned more once. Although he is an analyst for ABC, his contract permits him to appear on PBS and CNN. He has given dozens of interviews for various CNN domestic and international programs, including "American Morning," "Prime Time with Paula Zahn," CNN with Wolf Blitzer, CNN "News Night" with Aaron Brown, CNN "Moneyline" with Lou Dobbs, CNN "Weekend" with Anderson Cooper, CNN "Financial Network" (fn), CNN "In the Money," CNN "Headline News," various CNN "Weekends" shows and CNN international programs, including "Insight," "Q and A," "News Biz Today," and "Diplomatic License." Every time he appears on CNN, his book is usually mentioned or quoted.
on Oct 16, 2006
And as far as your "general" goes.....I think you better go listen once again to what he said. Because it "contradicts" EVERYTHING you're saying!

Link
on Oct 16, 2006
Drmiler

Your link and the British general has restated

The idea that we will create stable democracy is not going to take place. That is what Bush has said is the objective to stop the violence

He said that the present of foreign troops does make the violence worse.

He wants to get out soon.

Open your eyes Iraq is becoming a BIGGER disaster every day. The Iraqi government is not able to stop the discord and we are right in the middle of a civil war. The results on the ground PROVE Bush was dead wrong.
on Oct 16, 2006
He said that the present of foreign troops does make the violence worse.


Do you think we should leave Iraq? How is that going to make anything better and if you think it won't, what will help the situation?

I know you are far too agenda oriented to do anything more than complain but try and answer that question. I'll bet you five bucks you can't answer it without side stepping to a complaint about why we went there in the first place.

You see, sometimes you have to play the hand you are dealt. We all get it. You think Bush lied about why we should invade Iraq. We invaded Iraq and there isn't anything you can do to change that. However, instead of bitching about why we went you could offer some sort of constructive solution. Thing is, I'll bet you another five bucks, you don't have the first clue.

No bullshit from your books. I credit them for being biased works of fiction. No quoting someone else. Think for yourself and answer the question. You don't have the guts.
on Oct 16, 2006
just John

I do not believe we can stop the sectarian violence no matter how long we remain and when we leave, now or later, there will be an all out battle for control. Even though I did not agree with the decision to invade Iraq, once we made that choice we should have provided the force levels to prevent the sectarian factions from organizing which has brought us to the present situation. Our Policy compounded one error in judgment (invading Iraq) with a second error (not controlling the factions). If the war in Iraq is today the central focus of the Islamic terrorist movement, it is because we created the environment that allowed it by our invasion and release of the control that in the past prevented the sectarian violence from getting out of control. The side show that we also allowed to develop is the operation of foreign terrorists like al Qaeda which were not operating in Iraq prior to our invasion.

Our continued presence will not stop either the sectarian fighting not stop the foreign terrorists from operating in Iraq. We are in a NO WIN situation of our own making!
on Oct 17, 2006
He said that the present of foreign troops does make the violence worse.


You didn't listen to the link I provided did you? Because if you had then you'd know the general did "not" say that!
on Oct 17, 2006
He restated he thought that foreign troops should be removed as soon as possible and were adding to the terrorism. He also said. “Creating a liberal democracy (The Bush objective for deposing Saddam) is naive and WILL NOT BE ACCOMPLISHED" His statements are 100% opposite of the Bush policy and show another senior person that does not agree with the STAY the COURSE plan.
7 PagesFirst 5 6 7