Do you just write these stupid ramblings just for the sake of it? Only you can blame Bush for what the wackos in North Korea, and the wackos in Iran are doing. They wanted to obtain nukes LONG before Bush was elected, so now once again it's Bushs fault. What a joke. Of course we are moving into a dangerous time in history, no because of Bush, but because of wackos like these. Keep blaming America and blaming Bush, you guys have such a track record of winning elections that way.

Don't pay attention to this article. I wrote it after I had some drinks with some friends. Hell I can't even remember my password so I'm writing in annonimus, look at me, I still can't spell right. Anyways, please do me the favor and ignore any of my comments. I ran out of pills this morning and can not be responsible for my behaviour online. Thanks and sorry again.

, this is by far the saddest attempt to blame Bush that I have read on this site. It was sad enough to make me wanna comment on it.

First of all, the title is rediculous cause these people were not interested in nukes after 2003. They were in search way before that so you title is an embaressment to us Americans.

Now, you need to make up you mind as to who you are talking to when posting. You seem to have trouble staying on track with your own thoughts. First you say " The drive of North Korea and Iraq to acquire nuclear weapons is not to attack the United States ", then you say "It is true that both North Korea and Iran were trying to acquire nuclear weapons long before Bush invaded Iraq." Now make up your mind, is it Iraq or is it Iran, and don't say both cause that's not what you meat here. Oh, but it get's better : "It is true that both North Korea and Iran were trying to acquire nuclear weapons long before Bush invaded Iraq.". So they wanted it before Bush was President but now it's his fault they are trying to get it? Do you even read what you write? How exactly does Bush, or anyone for that matter, make anyone want something they already wanted, badly? You continue to talk as if these people were harmless, peace loving people that became monsters after Jan 1 2001.

For a man who claims to tell the truth as a reality, you really do live in an alternate reality. I have seen many others here who had negativity against Bush for what ever reason they have. But at least they are realistic and make you think. At least they make sense out of things and don't make up stories and twist situations to benefit they agendas. I may not always agree with their opinions but I respect them. you on the other hand are nothing but a lier, manipulator who thinks other peoples opinions are facts and that if it's good about Bush than they are liers but if it's bad about Bush then they are telling the truth. It's sad when a persons research stops at the end of the news article.

It's one thing for the Admins of this site to allow people to post their opinions on anyone or anything. But to spread lies, make up stories, sell twisted arguments and just give plain BS over and over; I believe it's time for the Admins to put a stop to it all. Freedom of speech? Not when you have your mind set and refuse to debate, instead you pound everyones head with the same garbage over and over. You don't have a clue what it is to be a real American. You claim Bush's modo is "my way or the high way" yet you never turn back on any of your arguments when defeated and call others by names. What a sad individual you are. Has your wife been getting any since you started your obssesion with Bush? When was the last time you hanged out with your kids? Have you been drinking beer with anyone else other than your PC? What was the last sports game you saw? Are you understanding where I'm getting at here? get a life. So you hate Bush, fine. Hows about you give your family more time than you give Bush and these articles of yours? Oh, and age is but a number. Your mind is still in it's teens. In case you didn't get that, you can be very childish on this site.

Have fun. Good day.

IslandDog

Are you just dumb or what. Please read this section of my Blog below:


It is true that both North Korea and Iran were trying to acquire nuclear weapons long before Bush invaded Iraq. However the preemptive invasion and willingness to affect regime change by force has increased the desire of these two countries to obtain a small supply of these weapons. \

The issue is that our attacking and regime change is NOT something ANY dictator wants. The best way to STOP the U.S. from attempting that is for the rogue state to have a few nuclear weapons. Do you really think Bush would have invaded Iraq if we knew Saddam had nuclear weapons he could have used against our military? No matter what you say, the FOREIGN POLICY we have been following IS NOT WORKING!!!!!!!

COL Jihad strikes again!

CNN just had an analyst state that one of the most knowledgeable experts on North Korea, a man with 30 years studying North Korea, has concluded that North Korea has decided that the beat way to prevent Bush from attempting regime change in North Korea, the way we did in Iraq, was to make it clear they were in possession of Nuclear weapons. He went on to say that North Korea has concluded they could not deal with the Bush Administration. The identity of the analyst was not revealed for security reasons.

Are you just dumb or what. Please read this section of my Blog below:

The only one dumb here is someone who constantly obsesses and blames everything on Bush no matter how ridiculous. Do you think they would just have stopped developing weapons if Kerry was elected? I have no doubt Iran would use nukes against Israel or the U.S. Don't give me that mutual destruction bs because islamists aren't afraid of self-destruction.

North Korea has already shown it will sell it's technology to pretty much anybody, but we should just be nice to them right col jihad. As usual you offer no ideas just the usual "blame Bush". Do you seriously understand how old it gets after years and years of the same stupid posts over and over again?

He went on to say that North Korea has concluded they could not deal with the Bush Administration. The identity of the analyst was not revealed for security reasons.

HA HA HA HA. An analyst on CNN they won't identity. Get a grip col.

IslandDog

Look at what the North Korean expert said.

CNN just had an analyst state that one of the most knowledgeable experts on North Korea, a man with 30 years studying North Korea, has concluded that North Korea has decided that the beat way to prevent Bush from attempting regime change in North Korea, the way we did in Iraq, was to make it clear they were in possession of Nuclear weapons

No matter what evidence is presented you defend Bush. Has the Bush policy made North Korea end its quest for nuclear weapons? Has the Bush Policy deterred Iran from moving forward with their pursuit of nuclear weapons? Has the Bush policy moved us closer to a peace in the Middle-east? Has the Bush policy ended terrorism in Iraq or Afghanistan?

No matter what evidence is presented you defend Bush. Has the Bush policy made North Korea end its quest for nuclear weapons? Has the Bush Policy deterred Iran from moving forward with their pursuit of nuclear weapons? Has the Bush policy moved us closer to a peace in the Middle-east? Has the Bush policy ended terrorism in Iraq or Afghanistan?

Just like you! No matter "what" evidence is presented, it's always Bush's fault.

Has the Bush policy made North Korea end its quest for nuclear weapons? Has the Bush Policy deterred Iran from moving forward with their pursuit of nuclear weapons? Has the Bush policy moved us closer to a peace in the Middle-east? Has the Bush policy ended terrorism in Iraq or Afghanistan?

That is just plain stupid col jihad. I see as usual you present no other policy except the usual defeatist attitude and "blame Bush" for everything game.

Col, peace will never be achieved in the middle east until you eliminate or reform islam. It's as simple as that. Bush has decided to fight terrorism instead of appeasing it. We see what appeasing has done in the past with North Korea being the perfect example. YOU CAN'T APPEASE OR NEGOTIATE WITH LUNATICS.

You do not answer the questions:


Has the Bush policy made North Korea end its quest for nuclear weapons? Has the Bush Policy deterred Iran from moving forward with their pursuit of nuclear weapons? Has the Bush policy moved us closer to a peace in the Middle-east? Has the Bush policy ended terrorism in Iraq or Afghanistan?

No matter who provides information, expert opinion or statistical facts, if it shows that Bush has not done an effective job it is either wrong or ignored. The problem is that there is so much data and evidence that clearly shows Bush does not know what he is doing and is not effectively solving ANYTHING.

Show me which of the major issues I sighted in BOLD Bush has effectively dealt with since he took office!

No matter who provides information, expert opinion or statistical facts, if it shows that Bush has not done an effective job it is either wrong or ignored

Col, the only expert opinions you cite is ones from people who are selling books, and have an anti-Bush obsession like yourself.

The issues you BOLD are not easily answered with yes or no. Like you ignored, peace will not be achieved with islam, so you cannot blame Bush. Show me the DEMOCRATS POLICY OF SOLVING THESE PROBLEMS COL.

If Bush bombed North Korea today you would be complaining about that. Nothing will please you people with mental disorders about Bush.

IslandDog

That is a lie;

The 30 year expert on North Korea I sighted above is NOT SELLING A BOOK.

I do not think Alan Greenspan, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, David Walker (Comptroller General), Generals: McCaffrey, Shinseki, Riggs, Powell, Paul O'Neil, Professor Record (Army ware College) , Professor Tsurumi, Paul Pillar (CIA), Professor Krugman are selling books. I have used these people and many others as sources in my book.

The results of the Bush policies are not trying to sell books. The statistical data from the departments of Labor, Census, Treasury, The GAO, CBO, Social Security Trustee's are not writing books. All these and more clearly show what has been taking place. The Woodward Book is not what Woodward dreamt up but what people with FIRST HAND knowledge have reported.

Whenever ANY source, no matter how knowledgeable or creditable produces ANYTHING that the Bush Zombies believe does not either support Bush or cast him and his policies in a bad light they are wrong. The polls that were just released show a trend that says Americas are feed up with Bush and the GOP leadership and the policies we are following. Bar some catastrophic event between now and November 7th I think you and the other Bushies will finally be faced with the reality that none of you will be able to deny!

The 30 year expert on North Korea I sighted above is NOT SELLING A BOOK.

What's his name?

Whenever ANY source, no matter how knowledgeable or creditable produces ANYTHING that the Bush Zombies believe does not either support Bush or cast him and his policies in a bad light they are wrong.

And you don't do the same? I notice you don't post in the articles that show how well the economy is doing. You are a defeatist liberal. You take joy in America failing, and you offer no ideas except "it's Bushs fault".

Americas are feed up with Bush and the GOP leadership and the policies we are following. Bar some catastrophic event between now and November 7th I think you and the other Bushies will finally be faced with the reality that none of you will be able to deny!

Col jihad, I already told you I don't care if they lose the House. It will only make our keeping the White House that much easier. Democrats have NO PLAN FOR ANYTHING EXCEPT PAYBACK. When America sees how vindictive the democrats are when they get some power, they won't make the same mistake again. Now what will be interesting is if the democrats do get power, will you criticize them. Of course not, because you are a political hack for the democratic party.

Remember, the democrats can't win power with their ideas, because they have none.