Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on December 23, 2006 By COL Gene In Politics

One of the most important issues is to reduce our dependence on foreign energy. I believe the most encouraging acknowledgement President Bush has made was about our dependence on foreign oil.

This issue is complex and impacts not only every American but permeates both our trade and foreign policies. To move our country toward a REAL solution will require a massive program that must be spear headed by the Federal Government. Past inaction has shown that the “Market Place" alone will not provide a solution. We need a program that consists of the more effective use of existing energy- foreign and domestic. We need a massive plan to put into place the production of energy using current technology. We need to advance the research and development of new technology to provide energy.

We must establish new and more stringent standards to increase the energy efficiency of our homes, appliances and the vehicles we drive. To implement this we should use our tax system to provide incentives to individuals and companies that meet or exceed the established standards and create tax penalties for those who fail to meet the new efficiency standards.

We should use our tax system to use existing technology to produce domestically controllable energy. There should be Tax credits and accelerated write off for the instillation of things like solar and wind farms. To convert oil and gas fired electric generation to clean burning coal. We need to increase the production and distribution of Bio Fuels. We need to allow the exploration of new gas wells off the coasts. New oil exploration should be limited to areas where danger to the environmental does not exist. We should develop oil sand and oil shale use rather then drilling in Alaska and off the Gulf Coast.

Finally we need to stimulate research into new ways to produce energy and new methods of propulsion. Since the pay back from this research is long term and may in some cases produce no tangible results, this element will need to be funded, for the most part, by Federal Taxes.

Nothing less then an aggressive energy program spearheaded by the Federal Government has any chance of producing results that will truly move us significantly toward real energy independence. We need a program on a scale of the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe or the Manhattan Project to develop the Atomic Bomb. What we are currently doing, or not doing, will not produce results that will come close to solving this problem! We should demand that the New Congress establish such a plan because it would truly benefit ALL Americans regardless of your political outlook or financial condition.
"

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 28, 2006
Glad to see there was no disagreement with this Blig!
on Dec 28, 2006
It's not that there's no disagreement. We're just trying to figure out "how" to answer this stupidity.
on Dec 28, 2006
Col proposing the federal government create another massive government program.  How surprising.

Let's start with building new nuclear plants.  Let's also start with building newer, more cleaner and efficient refineries on U.S. soil.  Are you willing to take on the environmentalists and their polls col?
on Dec 28, 2006
The cost and time it takes to build nuclear plants as well as the potential danger from terrorist attacks does not seem to be the best solution to me. Yes we will have to get our
Government to push this because the market place has shown for 30 years they do not intent to help make the U.S. energy independent. All they want is bigger profits today!

The only stupid thing is to continue doing NOTHING like we have for the past 30 years. We get further and further dependent of foreign oil and do NOTHING to deal with a growing problem as Bush has said.

We should start the funding of this project by rescinding the tax cuts to BIG OIL and imposing surtax on their profits when they become excessive as we have scene in the past several years.
on Dec 28, 2006
Of course.  I knew it wouldn't take long for you to bring up tax cuts.
on Dec 28, 2006
Glad to see there was no disagreement with this Blig!


LOL, since when is ignoring an acknowledgment of agreement? How come is it that Col seems to think that the solutions to all of our problems is for everyone to pay more taxes?

The cost and time it takes to build nuclear plants as well as the potential danger from terrorist attacks does not seem to be the best solution to me.


So you want a solution that can be done in a snap and that it's terrorist proof? Man what pot are you smoking? I want some, and I don't even do drugs.
on Dec 29, 2006
My suggestions are faster with less danger. Solar, Wind and Clean burning coal plus higher mileage for our cars is a solution that can be put into place NOW with REAL results. That will not happen without a BIG PUSH from the Fed and YEW the tax system is the way to make it happen. Rewards for cooperation and added taxes for lack of cooperation.

As for Big Oil, they have been receiving the BIG BUCKS and have done NOTHING to solve the problem. Time to END their gifts from the American Taxpayer. We are paying for all those tax cuts and the excess profits come about by over charging us at the pump!
on Dec 29, 2006

As for Big Oil, they have been receiving the BIG BUCKS and have done NOTHING to solve the problem. Time to END their gifts from the American Taxpayer. We are paying for all those tax cuts and the excess profits come about by over charging us at the pump!

It's not their responsibility to solve the so-called energy crisis you are complaining about.  The fact is oil is a big part of our society, like it or not.  Raising taxes on "big oil" as you leftists proclaim will do nothing but bring higher prices at the pump, ultimately hurting the "poor" people you act like an activist for.

We could lessen our dependence by building cleaner and more efficient refinieries in the United States, and by drilling for oil on our own land while looking for alternative sources.  However, thats very hard to do considering the enviro-terrorists we have in this country who opposed anything that has to do with oil. 

Nuclear power is another option to go with, and your reasons opposing it are ridiculous.  We should have never stopped buildling them in the first place.

on Dec 29, 2006
Island Dog

It may not decrease prices at the pump but by taxing excess profits and investing it into solutions for increased energy we move closer to a solution.

We could also reduce our dependence of foreign oil by forcing HIGHER mileage for cars
sold in the U.S. Bush has refused to take that step!
on Dec 29, 2006

It may not decrease prices at the pump but by taxing excess profits and investing it into solutions for increased energy we move closer to a solution.

Do you seriously have any understanding of reality?  If you raise taxes on "big oil" they will pass it on through the pumps.  You fail to acknowledge anything but somehow blaming "big oil" and Bush.

We could also reduce our dependence of foreign oil by forcing HIGHER mileage for cars
sold in the U.S. Bush has refused to take that step!

I don't believe higher mileage for cars will have any significant reduction in our dependence for foreign oil.  It's a bigger problem than making cares go a few miles longer on a tank of gas. 

It's really pointless to argue because all you do is find some way to blame Bush for a problem that has been going on for decades.  Do you understand people might take your posts seriously if you stop blaming Bush for everything?

on Dec 29, 2006
IslandDog

If Oil companies understand that if profits increase beyond reason, they will not increase the price at the pump if that profit is taxed away. One mile more per gallon is more oil saved that all the oil they have estimated could be recovered from the area in Alaska that Bush wanted to access. Almost 1/2 of ALL the oil we use is consumed in cars and trucks. Higher gas mileage will do a lot to reduce the amount of oil we consume and thus lower our dependence of imported oil.

Again all you want to do is live in a state of denial just like Bush!
on Dec 29, 2006

Again all you want to do is live in a state of denial just like Bush!

Do you seriously have to bring up Bush in every single post you make.  It's really pointless to debate someone with an obsession with Bush.

on Dec 29, 2006
Island Dog

Let me restate-- All you do is live is a state of DENIAL!
on Dec 29, 2006
Let me restate-- All you do is live is a state of DENIAL!


And YOU live in a constant state of stupidity!
on Dec 29, 2006
drmiler

What a sad excuse for a human being you are!
2 Pages1 2