Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on December 23, 2006 By COL Gene In Politics

One of the most important issues is to reduce our dependence on foreign energy. I believe the most encouraging acknowledgement President Bush has made was about our dependence on foreign oil.

This issue is complex and impacts not only every American but permeates both our trade and foreign policies. To move our country toward a REAL solution will require a massive program that must be spear headed by the Federal Government. Past inaction has shown that the “Market Place" alone will not provide a solution. We need a program that consists of the more effective use of existing energy- foreign and domestic. We need a massive plan to put into place the production of energy using current technology. We need to advance the research and development of new technology to provide energy.

We must establish new and more stringent standards to increase the energy efficiency of our homes, appliances and the vehicles we drive. To implement this we should use our tax system to provide incentives to individuals and companies that meet or exceed the established standards and create tax penalties for those who fail to meet the new efficiency standards.

We should use our tax system to use existing technology to produce domestically controllable energy. There should be Tax credits and accelerated write off for the instillation of things like solar and wind farms. To convert oil and gas fired electric generation to clean burning coal. We need to increase the production and distribution of Bio Fuels. We need to allow the exploration of new gas wells off the coasts. New oil exploration should be limited to areas where danger to the environmental does not exist. We should develop oil sand and oil shale use rather then drilling in Alaska and off the Gulf Coast.

Finally we need to stimulate research into new ways to produce energy and new methods of propulsion. Since the pay back from this research is long term and may in some cases produce no tangible results, this element will need to be funded, for the most part, by Federal Taxes.

Nothing less then an aggressive energy program spearheaded by the Federal Government has any chance of producing results that will truly move us significantly toward real energy independence. We need a program on a scale of the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe or the Manhattan Project to develop the Atomic Bomb. What we are currently doing, or not doing, will not produce results that will come close to solving this problem! We should demand that the New Congress establish such a plan because it would truly benefit ALL Americans regardless of your political outlook or financial condition.
"

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 29, 2006
drmiler

What a sad excuse for a human being you are!


I believe you "must" be looking in a mirror!
on Dec 29, 2006
No I was talking about you. Norman Mark thought so much of my book and the interview, I will have a 2nd interview on 16 Jan. Below is a book review:

George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich
Reviewer's Bookwatch, Oct, 2006 by John Burrough


George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich

Gene P. Abel

AuthorHouse

1663 Liberty Drive Suite 200, Bloomington, IN 47403

1425929427 $13.99 www.authorhouse.com 1-800-839-8640

George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich by Gene P. Abel, Colonel, USAR Ret. (over 30 years of service as a commissioned officer, and two-time recipient of the Meritorious Service Medal) severely questions the immediate and long-term effects to America that the Bush administration is responsible for. Sharply critical, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich decries the administration's narrow-minded attempts to partially privatize Social Security without providing any transition fund for the interim monies that would be lost; the administration's alienation of its foreign allies in the years after the September 11 attacks due its blind press for war in Iraq; and the administration's utter failure to balance the budget or prevent an explosion of the national deficit. At the same time, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich is not universally negative; it notes the wise actions that President Bush has taken, but laments that the harmful actions may well outweigh the good in the president's legacy for the 21st century. Drawing information from more than 40 renowned sources, and including humorous blogs to convey points with a twist, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich not only identifies potential current and future problems stemming from the Bush administration but also offers recommendations for alternatives to cope with their personal impact on individual lives. Highly recommended.
on Dec 30, 2006
No I was talking about you. Norman Mark thought so much of my book and the interview, I will have a 2nd interview on 16 Jan. Below is a book review:


No, you were talking about yourself. And I've read your stupid book. I wasn't impressed. You seem to forget one important fact. A book review is just one persons "OPINION"! Nothing more.
on Dec 30, 2006
drmiler

That is where you are wrong.

My book uses the most accurate sources to document the impact of the Bush/GOP policies. Agencies such as CBO, GAO, OMB, Treasury, Census, Labor dept. That is NOT opinion but cold hard facts.

Another group of sources are some of the most knowledgeable people in our country. Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, David Walker (Comptroller General), Generals MaCaffery, Powell, Shinseki, Clark, Riggs. Professors Tsurumi, Record,Krugman,Lewis,. Alan Greenspan, Paul O’Neil. The Presidential commission on Social Security, The Trustees of the Social Security System Brookings Institute and the Hoover Institute. Authors such as Michael Scheuer, Bob Woodward and Ron Suskind. The Army war College, Journal of Foreign Affairs, U.S. Conference of Mayors.

My book is far more then MY OPINION. IT is the collective information of all the above and documents what the Bush policies have done and provides specific alternatives as to alternate policies. The first section tracts the RESULTS. From that data it is clear that we are not heading is a direction that will solve the many important issues that face us as a nation and that the policies we have been following ignore the low income Americans, put pressure on most of the middle income Americans and line the pockets of the wealthy.

I suggest you read my book again and pay attention to the recourses used to write my book. It is not flattering toward Bush because the results of his presidency are not positive.
on Dec 30, 2006
drmiler

That is where you are wrong.

My book uses the most accurate sources to document the impact of the Bush/GOP policies. Agencies such as CBO, GAO, OMB, Treasury, Census, Labor dept. That is NOT opinion but cold hard facts.


You "really" are an asshat! NOWHERE did I say your "book" was an opinion! What I said is a "review" of ANY book is merely someones opinion.

Although "any" book like that is a compilation of information the way the author sees it. You can compile any facts you want, in any fashion you want..the conclusions you draw are still your "OPINION"! And just an fyi....I wouldn't waste my time reading your book again. Besides which, I threw it away like the trash it was.
on Dec 30, 2006
The book review is an opinion and you are correct. However it was done by people who are engaged in that profession.

The facts are just that - Facts. When I show what the Treasury reported about the Annual Budget Deficit year by year that is fact and when that shows the increase year after year it is not my opinion. When Commerce reports the trade deficit and shows that in every year during the Clinton Administration the deficit became larger and when I list the trade deficit during the Bush Administration that shows the very same increase, that is not opinion.

Where I did sight opinion I used multiple opinions and they were all from the most knowledgeable individuals or organizations in the country. Thus to dismiss the opinion of multiple experts shows a lack of objectivity. As I have said, when ever facts or knowledgeable opinion shows that the policies we have been following are not solving the problem you and some others on this Blog site either dismiss the information or attack the credibility of the data or opinion. If it were one or even a few opinions that were questioned, it might be reasonable. But when you attempt to dismiss the number and quality of the sources I have used, you simply show your ignorance and bias.

Others who have read my book have stated that it clearly shows the results of the Bush Policies. They have had very positive comments as to the clarity of the book and the amount of information contained between the covers. I did not select the title until after I HAD COMPLETED THE RESEARCH FOR SECTION ONE. When I had documented the results of the Bush/GOP policies that have been put into place over the past 6 years, the results of that research and the facts brought me to the bottom line of the Bush/GOP policies was just like the story of Robin Hood except Bush and the GOP took from the Poor and gave to the Rich.
2 Pages1 2