right

Glad you understand!

That you are a blind political hack? Yes!

only in your minds gentlemen. it's the same portable punditry that makes those claims every time. big whoop...the COL could put up 100 indisputable facts on "fact day" and they could all come down, sit on your face and wiggle, and ya'll would still claim ya proved him wrong...the neoconservative "smear over and over" methods wore thin a long time ago...but not in your minds. but when that's all ya know, i guess we shouldn't expect anything more.

the col's articles may be biased, and from a liberal perspective. and i'm sure he makes the occasional mistake like anyone. but claims that anyone has definitevely proved him wrong "on almost every article" is a joke. i have read so many threads that the neocons insist they have "proven him wrong" but actually don't do anything of the sort. just alot of mutual ass slappin and high fivin from the punditry. just cause you hate what he says, doesn't make them any less truthful. and anyway, no one has been proven wrong more in the last 6 years than the administration.

of course, i'm sure i'll get ridiculed for going against the vocal, neoconservative majority here @ JU....flame on...that all wore thin a long time ago.

have a nice day:)

I and others have proven you wrong on almost every article you have written. only in your minds gentlemen. it's the same portable punditry that makes those claims every time. big whoop...the COL could put up 100 indisputable facts on "fact day" and they could all come down, sit on your face and wiggle, and ya'll would still claim ya proved him wrong...the neoconservative "smear over and over" methods wore thin a long time ago...but not in your minds. but when that's all ya know, i guess we shouldn't expect anything more.

You are as wrong headed as the col is. Many others (myself included) have "proved" him to be wrong in just about every article he writes. Problem is, that if the "facts" contradict him in any way, he either ignores them or starts with personal attacks. I do "not" smear over and over. You don't know what you're talking about. If I say proven wrong to him it's because I have found "facts" that say he's wrong.

So now, "you" have a nice day.

drmiler

YOU HAVE NEVER PROVEN ME WRONG ION ANYTHING!!!!! PROVE IT!

:: blah blah blah...the only reason you are attackin me here (as predicted) in your case is because you can't work or play well with others so you are banned from my site.

but just to give you the benefit of the doubt, and put your assertions above to the test, that you aren't an attack dog, i am gonna lift your b/l...we'll see how it goes.

let me start us off with some common ground,,,GO STEELERS!

drmiler YOU HAVE NEVER PROVEN ME WRONG ION ANYTHING!!!!! PROVE IT!

Just go back over your articles klink, and you'll find what you seek.

You stated there was no yellow cake in Iraq, and you were shown to be incorrect.

You tried to misrepresent unemployment figures to blame Bush, you were caught.

You said there were no terrorists in Iraq, you were shown to be incorrect.

Shall I continue?

You stated there was no yellow cake in Iraq, and you were shown to be incorrect.

Like 500 meteric tons of the stuff. And if I'm not mistaken..."I'm" the one that put that proof out!

So now, who has "never" proven who wrong?

We were told we would be treated as liberators.


This I disproved to you months ago and you still won't let it go. This proves you are a liar. there are hundreds of thousands of still pictures of us being greated and offered candy in welcome to our invasion of Iraq and removal of Saddam. On other posts others and I think myself gave you the websites to see them. There are thousands of hours of video of the same thing. Disproven and you continue to make the same disproven statement makes you a liar. You stated on many articles that you were never proven wrong by anyone on JU. This is one of those never happens things.

The trust funds "exist" in the same sense that your checking account "exists". That doesn't make your checking account a "trust fund". They are accounts for the receipt & disbursement of funds, more or less set up like money market accounts. There was a time that they were "off the books" accounts that sort of met the common-sense definition of a "trust fund" but that hasn't been the case for years.

IslandDog


“You stated there was no yellow cake in Iraq, and you were shown to be incorrect.” I said the Yellow cake Bush reported in the State of the Union was not true and I am correct!

“You tried to misrepresent unemployment figures to blame Bush, you were caught.” I was correct the unemployment rate in 2000 was 3.9% and we have not created enough jobs to return to that point. In addition I proved with the U.S. Conference of Mayors Study that the New jobs are paying about 20% less then the jobs that were lost and have fewer benefits.

“You said there were no terrorists in Iraq; you were shown to be incorrect.” There were no terrorist operations and training in Iraq when Saddam, was in power. There may have been a few isolated al Qaeda operatives but nothing that was an organized group of terrorists. They began operating in Western Iraq AFTER the Bush invasion! They are also increasing in Afghanistan and Pakistan during the past year!

And now the col will start a new article saying the same things as if the facts presented never happened. This is usual for him when proven wrong.

except for the three terror camps set up by AQ,not counting the terrorist recuperating in his hospitals that were wounded in Aftghanistan and seen and reported by more than one news orginazation prior to the start of the war. So Public was the reporting that Saddam had the man taken out of hospital and shot in the streets just to prove he had nothing to do with it. That the terrorist crossed teh border and made it all the way to baghdad and into a state run hospital that was exclusive to Saddam and his higher ups. Oops.



And it has been widly reported that Mr. Wilson confirmed that report but wrote an article saying it was not true. I assume that because the report was classified no one could say different or call him a political hack and liar without breaking the law to prove him wrong. Now even the nation of Niger says it happened so are you still going to stick by a discredited story to prove your hate for a person elected by the MAJORITY?

Wow talk about an appropriate title for an article written by you Gene. You are a hypocrite if you expect the republicans in office to respect the majority and not fight when for the last 6 years the democrats in the minority did no such thing!!