Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on March 24, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics



Last night Gen. Powell spoke in SW Florida and was asked about Iraq. Gen. Powell said that mistakes made by the Bush Administration allowed the insurgency to develop into a Civil War in Iraq. He also admitted that Bush does not like him to call the situation in Iraq a “Civil War” but that is what he believes.




That brief comment clearly demonstrates the difference between these two men. Bush and his side kick Cheney talk about how they did the right thing in Iraq even though there is a never ending series of failures. We have the assignation attempt of the second most powerful leader in Iraq and the attempt on the life of the UN. Secretary General both which took place in the most secure area in Iraq. We had stories of how Iraq is unable to produce enough safe water because of the continued violence. We see stories that over 2 million Iraqi’s have fled Iraq because of the violence. We see stories of how the police have been infiltrated by death squads. We are told that just another 20,000 to Baghdad will do what 150,000 U.S. Troops and almost 400,000 Iraqi military and police have not been able to accomplish which is CONTROL the violence between the factions that want to control Iraq.

Bush looks at the world as he wants it to be. That is clear when he refuses to acknowledge that Iraq is, for the most part, a Civil War. It is clear when he said even if he knew in 2002 what we know today he would have invaded Iraq. Powell understands what the reality is in Iraq even though he would rather we had stability in Iraq and that the U.S. Forces were home. Powell acknowledges the mistakes that were made and would LEARN from those mistakes. Bush and Cheney would repeat the VERY SAME mistakes a second time.




The difference between Bush and Powell is that Bush was handed every job or opportunity he got by virtue of his father and the contacts his father developed. Powell started with nothing and produced his accomplishments by his own efforts. Powell is someone that is a leader that can look at the real world situation and relish his successes and learn from his errors. Bush is a product of privilege that lives in the world he wants not in the world that exists. Bush will not admit mistakes much less learn from his mistakes! Americans made a BIG mistake by allowing Bush to become President, and those that continue to support him are like Bush in that they can not accept the situation for what it is and refuse to learn from their mistakes!

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 27, 2007
Once again you failed to keep up on current events, history, or facts.
Once Iraq violated the cease fire any nation of the coalition was free to resume the war with Iraq. Just as the cease fire in North


So who's the IDIOT now? Care to refute the line? Because "that" line is part and parcel of your highly touted "international LAW"!
on Mar 27, 2007
drmiler

WHY DID BUST try and get U.N. Approval if as you claim he had the authority to act?

The bigger issue is that Congress did not grant authority to invade Iraq to enforce U.N. Resolutions. Also the issue that Saddam did not have the ability to be a threat to this country is totally ignored. He had no Nukes and his military was not capable of attacking anyone. Bush had the information at the time he insisted we were in danger and had to invade Iraq to stem a future attack! Pure BS!

If you believe Congress would have approved the war resolution to enforce U.N. Resolutions you live in a DREAM world!
on Mar 27, 2007

Then WHY did the Secretary General of the UN say we had no business invading Iraq?


I don't know why was his son on Iraq's payroll?

Why did Bush attempt to get the UN to approve the invasion of Iraq?


Because the Democrats in Congress wanted it.

When you look at the results of our invasion, anyone that concludes we did the right thing is totally out of touch with reality.


Or conclude that it was the right thing to do but the wrong politicians in congress waned to see us lose anyway in order to get political power.

Yesterday another 8 Americans died. We see attacks in areas that we have not heard of for years. What the surge is doing in the short run is changing the location of the attacks. What it will do in the long run is increase the cost to America and will not alter the basic problem which is the struggle for CONTROL of Iraq which is the definition of a Civil War!


Please show me a war with ground troops where we never lost a man? You are a hopelss political hack, nothing more.


The bigger issue is that Congress did not grant authority to invade Iraq to enforce U.N. Resolutions.


Again you failed to notice, or remember history. Congress demanded we have a vote in congress so they could all vote and show support. They begged the president to sign on to this war and then when the war did not end in a month they turned quickly screaming it was bush’s war and it was a quagmire. Have the liberals ever seen something through to completion? Are we not still fighting the war on poverty started in 1966?


on Mar 27, 2007
Then WHY did the Secretary General of the UN say we had no business invading Iraq?


I don't know why was his son on Iraq's payroll? That does not answer the Question.


Why did Bush attempt to get the UN to approve the invasion of Iraq?


Because the Democrats in Congress wanted it. Bush would not do ANYTHING the Democrats wanted!

When you look at the results of our invasion, anyone that concludes we did the right thing is totally out of touch with reality.


Or conclude that it was the right thing to do but the wrong politicians in congress waned to see us lose anyway in order to get political power. ANYONE that looks at the disaster in Iraq and believes we did the correct thing is NUTS!


Yesterday another 8 Americans died. We see attacks in areas that we have not heard of for years. What the surge is doing in the short run is changing the location of the attacks. What it will do in the long run is increase the cost to America and will not alter the basic problem which is the struggle for CONTROL of Iraq which is the definition of a Civil War!


Please show me a war with ground troops where we never lost a man? You are a hopeless political hack, nothing more. In the sane time we have not succeeded in Iraq we won WWII



The bigger issue is that Congress did not grant authority to invade Iraq to enforce U.N. Resolutions.


Again you failed to notice, or remember history. Congress demanded we have a vote in congress so they could all vote and show support. They begged the president to sign on to this war and then when the war did not end in a month they turned quickly screaming it was bush’s war and it was a quagmire. Have the liberals ever seen something through to completion? Are we not still fighting the war on poverty started in 1966? That does not address the fact that Bush did not ask Congress permission to invade Iraq to enforce UN Resolutions!
on Mar 27, 2007
In the sane time we have not succeeded in Iraq we won WWII


We had the support of an entire nation then. The war in Iraq was over in 6 weeks the peace in Germany took 10 years with insurgents running about. Most of that was keept quiet cause the press did what the American Press should do. You are ignorant of military history strange for one that was in war collage.
on Mar 28, 2007
Paladin77

I wonder why Bush could not get the support of other countries for the invasion of Iraq?
on Mar 28, 2007
Paladin77

I wonder why Bush could not get the support of other countries for the invasion of Iraq?


What are you? Blind, stupid or just plain dumb? Who do you think is in the coalition?
The US, all by her lonsome? Or have you forgotten the British, Greeks, Israel, etc..
on Mar 28, 2007
I wonder why Bush could not get the support of other countries for the invasion of Iraq?


Which countries are you talking about? You tell so many lies it is hard to keep track of which lie you are telling me now.

The topic of your article is Mr. Powel does this mean that you are losing this battle as you have all the others and want to change the subject?
on Mar 28, 2007
Which countries are you talking about? You tell so many lies it is hard to keep track of which lie you are telling me now.


Don't you remember?  France and Germany, and those for some reason are very important to liberals.
on Mar 29, 2007
France and Germany, and those for some reason are very important to liberals.


Oh right, I forgot those countries that were receiving oil credits from Saddam, and the documents that point to France agreeing to veto any UN action against Iraq. Germany and Russia seems to have promised the same thing. So if those are the countries that Gene counts I can understand his position wanting use to ask countries that will profit if we fail. Gene likes to support people that want to see us fail.
on Mar 29, 2007
What are you? Blind, stupid or just plain dumb? Who do you think is in the coalition?
The US, all by her lonsome? Or have you forgotten the British, Greeks, Israel, etc..


This is the second time I've proved him wrong. From now on I'll be saving links and keeping count.
2 Pages1 2