Clinton had all of those same problems and he did nothing. Except raise taxes on everyone. Highest tax hike in the history of the USA 5 days after he took office.
But even that wasn't good enough he had to collect more taxes from the year before.

SHOW me what Tax increases took place during the Clinton Administration. The last tax increase was the one that took place under Bush 41 (Read My Lips) tax increase.

The issue here in the Bush support for comprehensive Immigration or Amnesty which would grant 12 million or more people who broke our laws to become legal and add 2.4 Trillion to the cost of Social Security and Medicare. This HAS NOTHING to do with Clinton! STOP trying to change the issue!!!!!

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Saturday, June 09, 2007
His inability to work with other countries. His lack of attention to the Israeli/Palestine issue, health care, the environment, Social Security, Medicare, ineffective energy policy, trade and the export of American Jobs and The IRAQ WAR!


There is so much there that is just false, but I'm not wasting any time with someone who has a complete obsession.

YOU CAN NOT PROVE THAT BUSH handled ANY of these issues properly!!! He made every one much worse then when he took office or created the problem like Iraq and the Budget deficit!

April 7, 1994
The State and District Impact of the Clinton Tax Increase
by Mitchell, Daniel J.
Backgrounder Update #221

(Archived document, may contain errors)


4/7/% ZZI

THE STATE AND DISTRICT IWACT OF THE CLINTON TAX INCREASE

(Updadng Backgrosm&r Updae No. 2089 'ne States and Districts Hit Hard= by the 1"3 Tax bicrease:'November 24, 1993.) With April 15 just around the corner, many taxpayers are acutely aware tio the tax burden in America is at an all-titne high. This is due in part to President Clinton and Congress, who imposed on the American economy last year the largest tax in== in world history. While no region of the country was spared, the tax hike will have a particularly severe impm on certain states and districts. The state of Cali- fornia, for instance, will lose more thaii $37 billion over the next five years as a result of the new tam included in last year's leg- TEN HARDEST-HIT STATES islation. On a per capita basis, Connecticut is the hardest hiL Revenues Loss Per Capita The $5.8 billion impact of the'Clinton tax hike an Connecticut Arnount of Money equals $1,711 for every man, woman, and child in the state. Taken 6orn State Amazingly, all four U.S. Senators representing these two states voted for the tax bill. STATE my Per Capita The impact on al districts is even more pro- Connecticut $1,710.62 nounced. As detaileeinthe Appendix, 39 congressional districts Newlersey $1,429.09 will lose more than $1 billion apioce over the next: five years than to I= yeWs record tax hike. One district in Now York NewYork $1=.89 City will have more than $3A bdhon udwn out of ns economy Massachusetts $1,183.89 A dis= in southern California comes in second, losing nearly California $1.166.11 $2.8 billion. Surprisingly, the Members of Congress from these Florida $1,154.63 two districts voted in favor of the tax increase. Indeed, of the 39 Illinois $1,149.31 Members representing districts that will lose more than $1 bil- Maryland $1,138-57 lion, fourteen voted in favor of the tax increase. Hawaii. $1,09921 As the tables that follow indicate, no state or district will bene- Nevada $1,093.79 fit from the higher taxes. Thew figures notwithstanding, the Somr. U.S. Tna=ry. U.S. C@- wd White House still maintains that taxpayers come out ahead be- Connadonelludga Office _J cause higher taxes will stimulate economic growth, lower inter- est rates, encourage job creation, and reduce the budget deficit. it appears that none of thew goals win be met. hatted, by condnuing the high-tax policies of the BushWhite House, the current Ad- ministration is largely responsible for the emomy's continued -sub-par performance. Consider. V Economic growth, which historically has increased at an Unn"Al average Of more than five Pff=t the three years following a recession, has been averagirig barely half the levels normally achieved at this stage of a business cycle.

danielost

YOU HAVE now proven your hypocrisy

I knew there was NO FEDERAL tax increased under Clinton. As I said the last FEDERAL TAX INCREASE WAS UNDER BUSH 41. What you are saying is that because Federal revenue was CIUT to the states the sate taxes were increasing. GUESS WHAT BUSH has done more of that then Clinton. A Prime example is cutting the Federal share of Medicaid. By cutting that the burden on EVERY STATE increases. Thus what you called a Clinton Tax Increase is a GWB tax increase because Bush did the very same thing as Clinton!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

you idiot just because the tax increase reduced the amount of taxes doesn't mean that there wasn't a tax increase. increase tax rates does not increase tax revenue.

Clinton signed a bill 5 days after taking office that produced the highest tax increase in history and just because you and your liberal buddies are trying to change history doesn't mean it didn't take place.

Clinton signed a bill 5 days after taking office that produced the highest tax increase in history and just because you and your liberal buddies are trying to change history doesn't mean it didn't take place.

You are the Idiot. The Federal Income Tax rates were far higher just before Reagan took office. The top rate was 70%. The federal income tax rates DID not increase under Clinton.

dictator col. gene

you really need to read things other wise it just isn't worth the time to talk to you