Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
No need to wait for September.
Published on July 9, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics
The Iraq Government has not met a single benchmark to resolve the many issues essential to ending the violence in Iraq. It is now time to bring our troops home and allow the Iraqi people to deal with the future of Iraq. We can not continue to sacrifice our military for a country that refuses to do its part. This together with an increase in the violence can not be ignored. The time is up and Congress MUST force an end to our involvement in this misguided war!

Official: Iraq Gov't Missed All Targets
By ANNE FLAHERTY and ANNE GEARAN (Associated Press Writers)
From Associated Press
July 09, 2007 8:45 PM EDT
WASHINGTON - A progress report on Iraq will conclude that the U.S.-backed government in Baghdad has not met any of its targets for political, economic and other reform, speeding up the Bush administration's reckoning on what to do next, a U.S. official said Monday.

One likely result of the report will be a vastly accelerated debate among President Bush's top aides on withdrawing troops and scaling back the U.S. presence in Iraq.

The "pivot point" for addressing the matter will no longer be Sept. 15, as initially envisioned, when a full report on Bush's so-called "surge" plan is due, but instead will come this week when the interim mid-July assessment is released, the official said.

"The facts are not in question," the official told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because the draft is still under discussion. "The real question is how the White House proceeds with a post-surge strategy in light of the report."

So no one forgets here is what I posted May 3, 2007. I was one month off in my prediction:
August 2007 Will Show Bush was WRONG!<BR>
By COL Gene Posted Thursday, May 03, 2007 on Bush Truth Discussion: Politics

Bush again got his way and I think it is clear Congress will again give Bush his way in Iraq. The next funding bill may contain some non binding language about what the Iraqi Government should do but will have no impact on the outcome of the Iraq war. In August we will have the final input as to the impact of the Surge. I believe that evaluation will show that the Civil War and the operations of al Qaeda will be at a level that will clearly show the added U.S. Troops has not brought an acceptable level of stability to Iraq. We will see a political atmosphere in Iraq similar to today with no resolve to end the Civil war that has taken hold in Iraq. All the speculation will be behind us and it will be time to remove our forces from Iraq. If I am correct, Republicans who refuse to acknowledge the failure of the Bush Policy in Iraq will be in real trouble. I believe the funding for FY 2008 will be the time that Congress including enough GOP members will be in place to provide a veto proof bill. If the GOP continues to support Bush even with the clear failure of his policy, the day of change will be November 2008. I pray it will not take until January 2009 when the next President takes office to remove our brave military from a mission they should NEVER have been sent to by their Commander-in-Chief!

Comments (Page 6)
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6 
on Jul 15, 2007
that would be lets round it 75,000,000 are registered.

of that i will use half that is 32,500,000 that voted.


actually...according to the census bureau...

"The overall number of people who voted in the November 2004 election was 126 million"

WWW Link

as you can see,,,your numbers, as your perceptions, are WAY off.
on Jul 15, 2007
"The overall number of people who voted in the November 2004 election was 126 million"


ok fine that is still not a vaste majority

it is also not a majority

and that is my point


and i was using you perceptions not mine

Just because not everyone votes that does not mean they do not disagree with Bush-- The VAST majority do not support him!


how do you know have you talked to the vast majority of americans on this subject.

don't bother i know the answer and that is no you haven't.

nor has anyone else.

so stop using the term vast majority no body except sean is stupid enough to believe you. and i really don't think sean is that stupid either.
on Jul 16, 2007
you guys are funny.

dan, polls are pretty accurate most of the time. if they weren't we wouldn't use them the way we do (mostly). they are a pretty good idea of what most people are thinking. its obvious that polls could be used to get a certain result, but some polls try to be honest. i hope.

the word that bugs me is vast. vast doesn't just mean most, which i think is the appropriate word, it implies a huge majority. i concede that most people don't approve of bush, and how he's doing in iraq. but i would bet that most of the people who feel that way would still think col gene was shrill and ridiculous. i always thought it would be hard to see a man's face turning red just by reading his post, but i am getting a clean visual here.
on Jul 16, 2007
lol
on Jul 16, 2007
i know that polls can give you an idea of how people are thinking if they are conducted by people without an agenda.

but no way do they ever represent the majority of americans in anyway or any case.
on Jul 16, 2007

Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, July 16, 2007
I know that polls can give you an idea of how people are thinking if they are conducted by people without an agenda.

But no way do they ever represent the majority of Americans in anyway or any case.


Given how one-sided rejection of the Bush policies and him as a leader in ALL the polls, it is clear that the majority do not support him or the path he has taken America. In fact one of the MOST one-sided poll results is that Americans do not believe we are going in the right direction overall. If one or even a few polls showed non support for Bush and his policies or if the poll results were close I would agree they would be suspect. However given that ALL the polls, even polls taken by agencies that support Bush like FOX, show non support and given the degree of non support only some one that it totally delusional would believe that they do not show how Americans feel.
on Jul 16, 2007
Given how one-sided rejection of the Bush policies and him as a leader in ALL the polls, it is clear that the majority do not support him or the path he has taken America. In fact one of the MOST one-sided poll results is that Americans do not believe we are going in the right direction overall. If one or even a few polls showed non support for Bush and his policies or if the poll results were close I would agree they would be suspect. However given that ALL the polls, even polls taken by agencies that support Bush like FOX, show non support and given the degree of non support only some one that it totally delusional would believe that they do not show how Americans feel.


it is as clear that they do not support the democrats either

and i don't object to majority i object to the use of vast majority. when talking about a poll that has only 1000 to 10000 people being asked.

i also object to anyone trying to run the country by poll data.

on Jul 16, 2007

Seven gunmen also died in the fight, a rare open street battle between American troops and policemen. Washington has demanded the government purge its police force of militants, and U.S. and Iraqi authorities have arrested officers in the past for militia links. But the Bush administration said in an assessment Thursday that progress on that front was "unsatisfactory."


Definition of Total:

1. constituting or comprising the whole; entire; whole: the total expenditure.
2. of or pertaining to the whole of something: the total effect of a play.
3. complete in extent or degree; absolute; unqualified; utter: a total failure.
4. involving all aspects, elements, participants, resources, etc.; unqualified; all-out: total war.

Definition link

Based on the title of this article and the quote above, I would have to determine that the only total failure here is the writer of this article. He is a failure in not being consistent with his articles. Here we have an article depicting how much of a failure the Iraqi Gov't is based on a report from the US Gov't, it's ironically hypocritical for the writer of this article to go and write an article Titled Iraq Can Defend itself PM Said where he claims that Iraq is ready to take over. THis guy must be the stupidest person in the world. He claims not to be obsessed with Bush, he claims to have no hatred towards Bush, he even claims he does not just look at news articles that talk bad about the Bush administration. But, and that's a big
these 2 articles prove what I have always said about the writing style of the resident troll, Bush hater, Old Col Gene.
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6