Reply By: CharlesCS1 Posted: Tuesday, August 07, 2007
Look again at post #2.


“Look at number 5. Look really good. Maybe you can learn a thing or 2. If you spent more time addressing the issues and the real guilty parties and less time blaming Bush for all of them maybe you might get some traction on this site.”

I looked at #5. I am not blaming Bush for the failures of all his subordinates and people in the various federal agencies. I am holding him responsible for the outcomes of policy issues that HE was responsible for and pushed through Congress. Look at the issues I raised in Post 2:

NAFTA. It was Bush who supported the expansion of this policy even though it failed for 8 years before he took office.

Bush pushed to attack Iraq and made it look like Saddam was connected to 9/11. He insisted on the War Resolution and then directed the invasion.

It was Bush who insisted on cutting taxes and it was HIS budgets that at the same time increased spending. Thus the deficit is a direct result of HIS policies.

It was HIS energy policy that did nothing to help make us less dependent on foreign oil.

He is the one that appointed the Social Security Commission and insisted on creating private accounts. Even today after the Social Security Trustees have said Private Accounts WILL NOT solve the problem of how to pay the benefits to the Boomers; Bush is still pushing private accounts.

Bush supported Part D without a way to pay the added cost that is now over $60 Billion per year and growing.

It is Bush that refuses to increase taxes to pay for Iraq War and Katrina etc.

These are the results of policy choices not the failures of some subordinates.

Of coruse you have.  You twist and misrepresent headlines and reports all the time to make it more suit your agenda.  Myself and others have called you on this many times, but reading your others posts here, you just don't get it.

Look at how you are twisting your last post.  Bush never said Saddam was part of Sept. 11. We have debunked this how many times in your blogs, yet you still continue.  It's all just rehashed DNC talking points over and over.




Good.  The problem is you don't want tax increases.  You want tax increases on a certain class of people. 

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Tuesday, August 07, 2007
I have not twisted ANYTHING. I report the results and many on this Blog site do not like what the results show.


Of course you have. You twist and misrepresent headlines and reports all the time to make it more suit your agenda. Myself and others have called you on this many times, but reading your others posts here, you just don't get it.

Show me ONE that is from a headline:

NAFTA. It was Bush who supported the expansion of this policy even though it failed for 8 years before he took office.

Bush pushed to attack Iraq and made it look like Saddam was connected to 9/11. He insisted on the War Resolution and then directed the invasion.

It was Bush who insisted on cutting taxes and it was HIS budgets that at the same time increased spending. Thus the deficit is a direct result of HIS policies.

It was HIS energy policy that did nothing to help make us less dependent on foreign oil.

He is the one that appointed the Social Security Commission and insisted on creating private accounts. Even today after the Social Security Trustees have said Private Accounts WILL NOT solve the problem of how to pay the benefits to the Boomers; Bush is still pushing private accounts.

Bush supported Part D without a way to pay the added cost that is now over $60 Billion per year and growing.

It is Bush that refuses to increase taxes to pay for Iraq War and Katrina etc.

You would make excuses for Satan

what's the matter with Satin? it feels silky against the skin, it breathes, it cleans easy with cold water. Although for ultimate comfort I prefer silk.

LOL! 

Of course you are, how can you even say that when you won't even mention the names of other people in most of your bloggs. Hell if anything you make it seem as if the entire US Gov't is coposed of a single man or even worse, you make it seem as if Bush is actually a dictator and Congress has no power what so ever.

shame on you mm, you really do make excuses for satin. you're gonna sleep comfortably in hell.

Heh, I guess Col has something against satin as well, its probably Bush's fault too.

Reply By: CharlesCS1 Posted: Tuesday, August 07, 2007
I looked at #5. I am not blaming Bush for the failures of all his subordinates and people in the various federal agencies. I am holding him responsible for the outcomes of policy issues that HE was responsible for and pushed through Congress. Look at the issues I raised in Post 2:


Of course you are, how can you even say that when you won't even mention the names of other people in most of your bloggs. Hell if anything you make it seem as if the entire US Gov't is coposed of a single man or even worse, you make it seem as if Bush is actually a dictator and Congress has no power what so ever.


I blame Bush for the underlying policy choices. He is the one responsible for those choices and the results that flow from those choices are correctly placed on Bush!

NONE of YOU have addresses the basis issues which is a favorate tactic when you can not answer something. YES I had a TYPO. My point remains you would defend SATAN HIMSELF if he agreed with Bush!


DID any of you ever look at your posting? They are FULL of SPELLING ERRORS!

For example in this post:

Bloggs
Coposed
Favorate

You're funny Col. Blogg is not an error to me. I have seen this word often as titles to websites and I just stuck with it. Coposed simply missed a letter that the keyboard didn't type and Favorate was written by you. But you don't miss letter, you misspell words, at times several times the same word within the same reply. It's one thing to miss a latter in an entire reply, it's another when you write the wrong wrong to begin with and then write the same wrong word over and over. I could have hit the letter a instead of the s since they are next to each other on the key board, but the i is no where near the a when you wrote satin.

Satan is all about hate.


now who on this site does nothing but spout hate

Lier, you blame Bush directly for the catastrophe. How is Bush's policies responsible for the bridge and the steam pipeline? The money was there, it was not taken. Inspections were done and problems determined. How did any of Bush's policies affect these problems? How come you don't place blame on those who are the ones who did not try to fix these problems? The Mayors, Governors, the department in charge of repairing the bridge.

If I go by your logic then I can blame you for anything you grandchildren do wrong, am I right? After all, it was you policies at home with you own children that probably led to your grandchildren doing something they shouldn't have (had they done something theoretically, you do know what this means right?)

You're funny Col. Blogg

It is Blog or Blogs NOT "Bloggs". What about the other two? YOU ARE A REAL IDIOT!