Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.



We have never had a Commander- in- Chief that has been worse for our military. I am so glad that I was not asked to serve any of my 30 years while GWB was President. Below is what Bush has done to our military:


He avoided service in Vietnam by getting Daddy to get him a commission in the National Guard he did not earn and did not deserve.

He disobeyed orders and regulations while an officer in the Air National Guard by failing to take a required physical which resulted in him being grounded. He then avoided the penalty for disobeying his orders when Daddy got his an Honorable Discharge that Bush did not earn or deserve. We now have a Commander-in-Chief who would have members punished for doing the same things he did while he served in the military.

He committed our military to sacrifice their lives in a war that was unjustified and against a country that did not pose any danger to America.

He failed to send the force levels needed to accomplish the mission in Iraq which caused the needless death of 3,800 U.S. troops and the injury of another 27,000.

He overcommitted the military to the point where both the Army and Marines have been compromised and near the breaking point.

He has caused mid level officers to leave the service at an alarming rate including West Point Graduates who are leaving the Army at twice the rate as in the past. That will have an adverse impact for many years in the future.

He has over committed the National Guard to the point where that may be unable to meet the need within the United States if we have future disasters. Bush had destroyed most of the equipment of the Army, Marines, Army National Guard and the Army Reserve.

He has not requested sufficient funding for the VA to properly deal with the injured veterans that his invasion of Iraq created.

He diverted needed military forces from the war on terrorism in Afghanistan to invade Iraq. Now the situation in Afghanistan is becoming worse and will require more dead and injured then if Bush had finished the destruction of al-Qaeda in 2002-2005.

He has caused parents to try and prevent their sons and daughters from serving in our military.

His attitude has prevented the needed cooperation of other countries and placed a much bigger burden on the U.S. Military.

He opposed a bill to give our military another 1% pay increase proposed by the democrats while approving the payment to civilian security contractors 6 times the amount we pay our military for the same services.

ANYONE who can look at the above results on our military that were caused by George W. Bush and his policies is NOT a supporter of the brave men and women who serve in our armed forces.

Comments (Page 3)
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5 
on Oct 16, 2007
Reply | Edit | Delete




Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
“More bad news out of Iraq. Al-Qaeda is almost kaput”

If you go back and read my Blogs you will see that is what I said our military should be doing. That is great news. The problem is the majority of the 160,000 U.S. Troops ARE NOT fighting al-Qaeda in Iraq. The other fact that all the Bushies want to ignore is that al-Qaeda is in Iraq BECAUSE of the Bush invasion. They were not operating in Iraq prior to our invasion.

If we have defeated al-Qaeda in Iraq we need to pull all our troops not fighting al-Qaeda out of Iraq and send more troops to Afghanistan where the fighting is getting worse. We should retain enough combat troops in Iraq to insure al-Qaeda in Iraq does not reemerge. I bet Bush does not begin removing our troops from Iraq!
on Oct 16, 2007
Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
“If you support Bush in Iraq you have NO love for our military.


COL Gene,

I'm begging you...PLEASE, oh, please, grow a sense of humor!

Go stand in the corner for not getting an obvious joke!”


I do not make jokes about how badly our military has been misused by Bush!
on Oct 16, 2007
you see i knew he would turn good news into bush bashing. hence the reason i used the words bad news.
on Oct 16, 2007

“Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
You see I knew he would turn good news into bush bashing. Hence the reason I used the words bad news.”


I did no such thing. Since we have destroyed Al-Qaeda we no longer need remain in Iraq! We need to go to Afghanistan where al-Qaeda is growing in power. The war on TERROISM in Iraq is over. We should leave enough troops in Iraq to insure that they do not come back. That does not require anything close to 160,000 troops.
on Oct 16, 2007
I do not make jokes about how badly our military has been misused by Bush!


COL,

And that is the key reason you're not effective in getting your point across. When you have a legitimate point, you steamroll over replies by your readers by maintaining a single focus: That Bush, and Bush alone, is responsible for every atrocity ever committed by humankind!

If you'd get a sense of humour, people would possibly be more receptive to the occasional legitimate points you have.
on Oct 16, 2007
If the "Replies" were anything other then to make excuses for Bush and his policies I might respond differently. It is hard for me to consider sending our military, which I served for 30 years, into a life and death situation when I know our country was not in any danger from Saddam. The bottom line is that every one of the dead and injured has made their sacrifice for no valid purpose. Anyone that believes we are any less likely to be attacked by our enemies because of the sacrifices we have made in Iraq is dreaming. The only reason we have not had another attack in the U.S. is that we are doing much more to protect our homeland not because of the 3,800 who died in Iraq and not because of the 27,000 that were injured in Iraq. Every family who has lost a loved one or must watch how the lives of the 27,000 injured have been effected want to think the sacrifice their family member made was to make us safer at home. That is not the case. Our invasion has created more enemies that could attack us in the future. If you lost a son or daughter and knew their death made our homeland LESS safe, how would you feel? People do not want to admit this but it is the SAD truth about the Iraq War.
on Oct 16, 2007
more bad news out of Iraq. al quida is almost kaput


see that word gene. it means the job in iraq is not done yet.


so now you want to make the same mistake that they have been doing in iraq up to this year.


that is leaving the job undone and to let the enemy rebuild.

on Oct 16, 2007
“See that word gene. It means the job in Iraq is not done yet.”


What Job is not done? Bush told us we had to prevent the terrorists from operating in Iraq so they could not attack the U.S. That has been accomplished. Why would we keep tens of thousands of our troops in the BAGHDAD AREA? THERE ARE NO TERRORISTS Baghdad - IF WE HAVE DEFEATERD THEM, All we need is a force to insure the al-Qaeda does not reestablish itself in Iraq. That might be 20-25,000 at most!
on Oct 16, 2007
what ever
on Oct 16, 2007




Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
what ever

I take it you have no more excuses for the Bush "Stay The Course" Policy in Iraq!
on Oct 16, 2007
I take it you have no more excuses for the Bush "Stay The Course" Policy in Iraq!


lets see stay and finish the job or run away now that the job is almost done.
on Oct 16, 2007
Go stand in the corner for not getting an obvious joke!”


Does anyone want to tell Gene what a vagina is?

Oh, wait...we don't want him breeding...  

~Zoo
on Oct 16, 2007

Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
I take it you have no more excuses for the Bush "Stay The Course" Policy in Iraq!


lets see stay and finish the job or run away now that the job is almost done.

Saddam is gone, Iraq has a government, we have trained their Army and police and al-Qaeda is done-- WHAT more are we expected to do? Time to bring the troops HOME!
on Oct 16, 2007
al-Qaeda is done


al quida is almost done.


we still have to stop iran
on Oct 16, 2007
“Al-Qaeda is almost done.”

I understand that. However it does not require 160,000 U.S. Troops for that mission.

“We still have to stop Iran”

WRONG-- Bush has NO authorization to attack Iran. That is not a reason to keep 160,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.

It is time to remove the vast majority of our troops from Iraq. Congress needs to cut the funding to reflect that reality!
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5