Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Lack of Ground Forces is the Reason for Air Attacks!
Published on October 29, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics



The use of U.S. Air power in Afghanistan is creating tension between the people and government of Afghanistan and the U.S. American military commanders claim they need to use the air assets because of the lack of ground forces in Afghanistan. The collateral damage, as it is called, from air strikes is turning many Afghanis’ against the U.S. effort to destroy the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in that country.

It is another result of Bush sending the bulk of our ground forces into Iraq and not dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who are responsible for 9/11. Hamid Karzai is now DEMANDING that Bush cut the use of U.S. Air Power in Afghanistan. The problem is that so long as Bush refuses to withdraw our ground forces from Iraq, we do not have the resources needs to deal with the Terrorists in Afghanistan.


The refusal of President Bush to address the REAL enemy in the war on terrorism is hard to believe. The vast majorities of our ground troops in Iraq are NOT fighting terrorists but are involved in the fighting between the Iraqi factions. Congress needs to act to curb a Commander-in-Chief who has lost his perspective on just WHO the REAL terrorists are that endanger our country!

Comments
on Oct 29, 2007

It is another result of Bush sending the bulk of our ground forces into Iraq and not dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who are responsible for 9/11.


More useless Bush bashing without backing it up with facts.

From the same story which you seem to cherry pick....

The use of airpower is key to the U.S. and NATO fight against insurgents because of Afghanistan's mountainous terrain and the sheer size of the country. U.S. and NATO officials say Taliban fighters frequently attack their soldiers from civilian homes that the insurgents have commandeered.

Iraq is not even mentioned, just more rhetoric from you.




on Oct 29, 2007
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007

It is another result of Bush sending the bulk of our ground forces into Iraq and not dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who are responsible for 9/11.


More useless Bush bashing without backing it up with facts.

From the same story which you seem to cherry pick....

The use of airpower is key to the U.S. and NATO fight against insurgents because of Afghanistan's mountainous terrain and the sheer size of the country. U.S. and NATO officials say Taliban fighters frequently attack their soldiers from civilian homes that the insurgents have commandeered.

Iraq is not even mentioned, just more rhetoric from you.


THE TOP U.S. COMMANDER SAID WE MUST ALSO USE AIR POWER BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH GROUND TROOPS.

The fact remains Bush has most of our available ground forces fighting Iraqi's in Iraq. Only a small portion of the 160,000 troops in Iraq are currently fighting A-Qaeda and other terrorisms. We need to keep just enough troops in Iraq to deal with foreign terrorists and insure we have the needed manpower in Afghanistan!

It is also a Fact that Karzai DEMANDED Bush cut the use of Air power in his country because of the civilian deaths they are causing!
on Oct 29, 2007
It is another result of Bush sending the bulk of our ground forces into Iraq and not dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who are responsible for 9/11.


That's not what the story says.  You act like there are no forces in Afghanistan.  You truly have no understanding about this.


THE TOP U.S. COMMANDER SAID WE MUST ALSO USE AIR POWER BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH GROUND TROOPS.
 

Not according to your story.

Move on with your life gene, your endless rants about Bush have become completely insane.





on Oct 29, 2007




Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007
It is another result of Bush sending the bulk of our ground forces into Iraq and not dealing with the terrorists in Afghanistan who are responsible for 9/11.


That's not what the story says. You act like there are no forces in Afghanistan. You truly have no understanding about this.

The TOP U.S. Commander said we must use Air Power because we do noy have the troops
on Oct 29, 2007
This is another report from the Center on Strategic Studies:



Anthony H. Cordesman

Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy

acordesman@aol.com



February 15, 2007



No one can return from visiting the front in Afghanistan without realizing there is a very real risk that the US and NATO could lose their war with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and the other Islamist movements fighting the Afghan government. We are still winning tactically, but we may well be losing strategically.



The facts on the ground are not simple. The appendix to this briefing lays out these facts in far more detail, along with evidence of critical shifts in Afghan public opinion that show the war is still winnable, but there has been a serious deterioration in the situation. It also shows there are no simple solutions that can work. Winning will take more resources, more forces, more patience, and at least 5-10 more years of persistent effort.