Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on October 30, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics

This is the cry of most Republicans and some Democrats. It is time to stop making this generalized statement and take an HONEST look at the Federal Budget. To help with that please take a look at the following Web Site: www.thebudgetgraph.com . It will give you a very clear picture of just where the Federal Government is spending YOUR tax dollars.

I have looked at this issue as well at the major issues that face our country and will impact spending for the foreseeable future. The objective was to see just where the spending cuts can be made to solve the nation’s fiscal problems.

First we need to understand ALL Federal spending falls into one of two types. One is “mandatory spending” and the other is termed “discretionary spending”. Both types have been increasing at a fast pace. When we talk about cutting the budget we must understand the items which are mandatory are NOT subject to cutting without violating promises that have been made by the Government of the United States. The three biggest elements in this category are Interest on the National Debt, Medicare and Social Security. In round numbers that mandatory spending is about $2 Trillion Dollars per year.

The other category is discretionary spending and is made up of elements that CAN be cut without violating the promises made by our country. The amount of that type of spending is about $800 Billion per year. If you fail to look at what is included in that $800 Billion one can come to the conclusion we can solve our fiscal problems by simply cutting this discretionary spending. Now it is time to take a look at the budget graph I referenced.

You will see the largest element in that category which comprises more then half of discretionary spending is National Defense. Another large component is Homeland Security. Help for the poor for Food Stamps and Medicaid rounds out the major items. These three make up MOST of the discretionary spending.

Let’s take a look at the largest spending items within the budget and the prospect for cutting them in the future.

Mandatory Items:

Social Security- this will increase at a growing rate as the Baby Boomers retire which will start in February 2008.

Medicare – This will increase for the same reason as Social Security plus the addition of the Prescription Drug Program and the increasing cost of health care. This will increase far more then Social Security.

Interest – This will continue to increase so long as we add to the National Debt. The national debt on Sept 30, 2006 was $8.5 Trillion. The National Debt on September 30, 2007 was $9 Trillion. Despite the lie Bush told that the annual deficit was $168 Billion that actual amount we added to the total debt was $500 Billion in FY 2007. Go to the U.S. Treasury web site for the actual amounts to the penny.

Discretionary Items:

National Defense – That will increase substantially because of the increase in the Active Duty strength, pay increases and because of the replacement of most of the equipment for the ground forces.

VA- This will expand in a major way to pay for the injured veterans from the Iraq war.

Homeland Security - That will need to increase as we build the border fence and add the needed border guards. The new equipment and new ID cards and systems will also require added spending. The Coast Guard will see an increase in spending as will federal law enforcement and intelligence services.

Medicaid - As more and more people are becoming eligible and medical cost increase, the cost of this program will increase.

Pell Grants – The lower interest rates for student loans will increase the overall cost of this program.

Federal Road and Bridge maintenance – This will increase given the condition of the ageing roads and bridges.

The above are the areas that surely will require added spending. These items make up the BULK of the overall spending. When you look at the magnitude of these items it will not be a surprise that spending will continue to increase. I would like to have ANYONE provide specifics as to where and by how much the so called “spending cuts” can take place that will both balance the budget and then provide a REAL Surplus to be used to pay down the over $9 Trillion dollar national debt.


The time has passed for statements like - “the problem is our Spending”. We need to provide specifics areas and amounts where spending can be CUT to come up with the money needed to balance the budget and begin paying down the debt! I believe the chance of spending cuts solving our fiscal problems to be about the same as winning the Power Ball Lottery! Remember, mandatory spending is just that!

Comments (Page 11)
11 PagesFirst 9 10 11 
on Nov 04, 2007

Children do not have to die to go to bed hungry of fail to receive medical care. For several years I served as President of a non profit agency that dealt with housing for low income families and seniors. I saw first hand how miserable a life many of the poor live. No they do not always die but the quality of their life is very POOR. Just keep denying the truth that the poor need help, RICH Man. Just like Jesus said in his parable of Lazarus.

How much did you give to charity last year, Gene? Want to compare, Lazarus?

You see, dumb people think that taxation or believing in high taxes makes them charitable. It does not.

Charity is the voluntary giving of money to someone else to help them.  You desiring other people to fund things you believe in doesn't make you charitable.

Not only do people like me pay a lot more in taxes, but we donate a lot more to charity.  In fact, in a recent study, it was shown that conservatives give more blood than liberals. That's a resource we all have and yet, even on that minor thing, liberals can't even walk the walk there.

 

on Nov 04, 2007

I have no idea you financial situation but anyone making $30K that supports Bush and his policies is not thinking clearly! My use of the term Rich Man applies to the wealthy supporters of Bush that could care less about the poor. My income is in six figures but I believe we need to help people and families at the bottom of the ladder and need to meet the needs of Middle Income Americans i.e. living wage jobs. Bush IGNORES BOTH GROUPS!

Here's a clue: The government is not a charity organization.

And you're right, I could care less about "the poor". I do care about people who have had unforseen circumstances occur to them (illness, unexpected life events, etc.).  And I am (and do) happy to help people who have gotten a raw deal out of life.

But no, I don't care at all about the idle poor. The people who are so stupid that they squander every opportunity given to them.  And having grown up poor, knowing who the poor really are, I can say with some confidence that the majority of "the poor" in the United States are total losers.

Having a worthless fool like Gene trying to define what a "traitor" is is laughable. 

 

on Nov 04, 2007

Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Sunday, November 04, 2007
DON"T YOU DARE CALL ME A TRATOR. I served my country, helped the poor and never asked for help from anyone.


You spent the bulk of your time in a military that was FIGHTING Communists, now you want to bring them in the front door? That is what I call a traitor.


The war in Iraq has not made us one bit safer and has created MORE enemies that want to bring the fight to us. What Bush has done is like throwing gas on a burning fire. He attacked a Moslem country that was NOT part of the War on terrorism when he attacked and allow it to expand into that country. So if you believe anyone that brings radical Moslems to us is a traitor, then Bush by your definition is the TRAITOR!
on Nov 04, 2007
knowing who the poor really are, I can say with some confidence that the majority of "the poor" in the United States are total losers.


sorry again but there are many total losers who aren't poor. ted kennedy for one.
on Nov 05, 2007
then Bush by your definition is the TRAITOR!


You keep operating under the erroneous notion that I support Bush, Col. This despite the fact I've told you otherwise probably in excess of 100 times.

This is what makes you such a wretched, abhorrent person, Col. You won't even acknowledge points of agreement, but still verbally bash people as long as you can.

Let me tell you something, Col. When you first came on here, I actually gave serious thought to buying your books. You had something worthwhile to say. Over the years you've become such a raving lunatic I wonder how you wrote one, let alone whether it's worth the time to read. In short, you've cost yourself at least one potential customer because you're so flipping nuts I can't stand you!
on Nov 05, 2007
Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007
then Bush by your definition is the TRAITOR!


You keep operating under the erroneous notion that I support Bush, Col. This despite the fact I've told you otherwise probably in excess of 100 times.

Then why do you defend his POLICIES?
on Nov 05, 2007
Then why do you defend his POLICIES?


he isnt defending his policies. he is attacking your attacks.
on Nov 05, 2007


Statements like that demand a frank response. Anyone that would propose such a thing is irresponsible and so far out of touch with America that attempting to REASON with them is useless!


Are you talking about yourself or Gid?
on Nov 05, 2007
We Need to CUT Spending!


this is the only thing you have right on this whole blog.
11 PagesFirst 9 10 11