Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
and it's not Social Security, Defense or Medicare
Published on February 14, 2005 By COL Gene In Politics

President Bush ignores the real problem and potential solution to this country's fiscal morass which is the interest on the national debt. The rationale used to mitigate the increasing debt is that it is the same % of GDP. The real issue is not the percent of GDP the national debt represents but how much interest does that debt require us to pay.

Since 1980, American taxpayers have paid $6.5 trillion in interest on our national debt. That amount of money would have solved both Social Security and Medicare funding problems as far as the eye could see. The ongoing interest comes off the top of our tax dollars and is in the $330 billion range in the 2004-05 budget. That money would pay for prescription drugs, increased national and homeland defense expenditures, education, and still leave room for another tax cut.

The real issue is that the worst is yet to come. Interest rates are at a 45 year low and when they return to their historic norms, the interest payments will skyrocket to as much as $500 billion per year. The interest payments never end until we repay the debt. If you look at the Bush Budget on the OMB web site, you will see he is telling the American taxpayers that by the time he leaves office we will have a national debt of $10 trillion. When he took office that number was $5.7 trillion. When Ronald Reagan took office that number was $909 billion or an increase of 11 times from 1980 to 2008.

The issue with the federal budget is not cutting social programs, increased defense expenditures or the impact of the baby boomers (Social Security and Medicare). It is the growing interest on the national debt. The policy we are following does not stop adding to the national debt and will not reduce the interest we will be required to pay year after year. Until we face up to the fact that we must pay for what we are spending there is no solution and in time the debt and the interest obligation it carries with it is going to swamp the American economy.

Comments
on Feb 14, 2005
While you do make a few decent points here, I think it's interesting how quickly you dismiss the low percentage of the GDP our national debt is. Just think how well the finances of most families would be running if we could reduce our personal debt to the same percentage as the U.S. national debt.

Another thing I found interesting about your article is what you propose should be done with the money that would be "saved" by releasing ourselves from that 800lbs gorilla of interest. While I'd agree that interest is the burdon that comes with debt, I don't see how your suggestions "saves" us any money. Apparently, you would have the government take that money and spend it somewhere else. $100 spent on interest, defense, social programs, or whatever, is still spent... so where is the savings? More importantly, where is the benefit to the taxpayer?

Also, while we can agree that reducing the debt would be a good thing, you make it sound like doing away with it completely would be just as good. Well, could we completely do away with the national debt and not do away with government backed investment/retirement programs? Whether the "debt" is owed to international bankers, the Federal Reserve or citizens with government backed investments, it is still part of the debt.

on Feb 14, 2005
The money we are spending on the interest does nothing for our needs. It pays for the past when we spent more than our income. Yes I believe some of the money being spent on interest should fund our needs. You will also notice I suggested some of it could fund another tax cut.

The point is that our tax and fiscal policies will never even stop the growth in the total debt much less pay it down. If we could get it back to the amount it was in 1980, we would be able to fix Social Security, Medicare and pay the added defense costs and have money to spare. The path Bush is following never solve our fiscal problem! His policies make the problem get worse and worse!
on Feb 15, 2005

I think it's interesting how quickly you dismiss the low percentage of the GDP our national debt is. Just think how well the finances of most families would be running if we could reduce our personal debt to the same percentage as the U.S. national debt.
You don't consider the quality of GDP, half of which is generated by foreign countries, in contrast to the past when GDP was virtually based on our own substantial productivity. Personal debt does not factor in assets, which the government can't do and even if it could, renting an aircraft carrier or paying rent to Trump for the capitol building would be pathetic. 

"The real issue is that the worst is yet to come. Interest rates are at a 45 year low and when they return to their historic norms, the interest payments will skyrocket to as much as $500 billion per year."  Great point! And Greespan in '99 feared that the surplus generated would pay down the debt too rapidly!!

on Feb 15, 2005
The end of the world has arrived. I totally agree with Col. Gene.
on Feb 15, 2005
Stevendedalus

GW took care of Greenspan's fear. We are not repaying the debt too fast!