Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.



Today on Meet the Press Pat Robertson and Jay Rockefeller talked about the report of the Presidential Commission on Intelligence. It was clear from their discussion that a number of intelligence agencies told the administration and the world that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction or the ability to produce them. The Department of Energy clearly indicated that Saddam had no nuclear capability. Elements of the CIA, the U N chief weapons inspector and the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency also advised that Saddam did not have WMD or the capability to produce them.

The question of why the Bush Administration ignored this intelligence will be examined in the second phase of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on our intelligence system. It appears that administration officials in DoD and the White House ignored those agencies which did not support the notion of WMD in Iraq. This is disturbing and it looks more and more as if the administration only used that intelligence which supported their preconceived intent to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

Comments (Page 6)
6 PagesFirst 4 5 6 
on Apr 13, 2005
It's obvious some Bushites want to stifle discussion of Iraq as more and more facts make it tacitly clear that mistakes, lies, and corruption make up the majority of this administration's policies regarding Iraq. Some don't want to hear the "broken record" or the "leaky faucet" but until this issue is cleared up and as long as developments surface pertaining to Iraq, it's important that they are talked about.


---Why doesn't anyone [not pointing fingers so DO NOT START BASHING] talk about the good things in iraq, new schools, new jobs, oil production {though it is low, it's picking up} etc... hmm? is everything in iraq really so horrible?


on Apr 13, 2005
Yup, for sure. I just did my taxes, and I paid more than I have ever, ever paid in my life. And, it's not because my income is so high. The tax cuts are a fallacy, a stupid illusion. The interest on the deficits, the rising costs of fuel which is likely a direct result of the Iraq invasion, the costs of health care and education and food and everything is going up and up and up, resulting from the fuel costs. And, all these brainless wonders can see is this illusory tax cut. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical companies, insurance and banking industries, oil companies, defense contractors, etc. are laughing all the way to the bank. Brainless wonders...............


My advice? Go to H & R Block. Because you obviously do NOT know how to do your taxes.
on Apr 14, 2005
We are past the drop in revenue in 2001 and 2002. Why do we have a $675 Billion difference between tax revenue and spending in 2005 after the economy has recovered?
on Apr 15, 2005
Lucas, people do talk about what good there is in Iraq, I see "Rah! Rah!" pieces on Fox fairly frequently - whenever there is favorable news to report to the homefront. The administration wants very badly for things to look as good as possible in Iraq (don't you remember all the rosy talk about how well things are going in Iraq ALL last year?), so don't think they won't shout good news from any mountaintop.

Something to remember:

This administration with the help of our media have done their very best to blackout "damaging" coverage (i.e. conflict and protests) from American eyes. If you want more coverage, check out www.bbc.com and www.al-jazeera.net, I also recommend the online Australian Newspaper "The Sydney Harold".

6 PagesFirst 4 5 6