Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.


Former 9/11 Committee Chairman and NJ Governor (R), Tom Kean and the Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton (D) have charged President Bush and Congress have failed to enact several strong security measures recommended by the 9/11 Commission. More then four years after 9/11 and we are not paying attention.

Hamilton said, "we believe that another attack will occur. It's not a question of if." Why is President Bush and the leadership in Congress not acting to protect America? The only major element of the 9/11 recommendations Bush and Congress acted upon from the commissions report is the creation of the National Intelligence Director.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 05, 2005
I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll answer your question just as soon as you answer mine. Why did Bill Clinton ignore all the warnings he was given about Al-Queda attacking us in the first place.


Grassley asked for an investigation into how the FBI handled the July 2001 memo from the FBI's Phoenix field office recommending the bureau keep an eye on flight schools, obtain visa information on enrolled pilots and coordinate a nationwide investigation.

FBI Director Robert Mueller told a Senate panel last week that memo likely did not make it to high levels of the FBI or the CIA and that the agency should have made it a higher priority.

"This memo has emerged as one of the most significant and alarming warnings that the FBI had before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Grassley wrote. "It is essential that there be an outside review of this matter by your office to answer all outstanding questions, ensure accountability at the FBI and reaffirm the trust of the American people."



"We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or July of 2001" - A former FBI translator told the 9/11 commission that the bureau had detailed information well before Sept. 11, 2001, that terrorists were likely to attack the U.S. with airplanes. - A former FBI wiretap translator with top-secret security clearance, who has been called "very credible" by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has told Salon she recently testified to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States that the FBI had detailed information prior to Sept. 11, 2001, that a terrorist attack involving airplanes was being plotted.
on Dec 05, 2005
I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll answer your question just as soon as you answer mine. Why did Bill Clinton ignore all the warnings he was given about Al-Queda attacking us in the first place.


Grassley asked for an investigation into how the FBI handled the July 2001 memo from the FBI's Phoenix field office recommending the bureau keep an eye on flight schools, obtain visa information on enrolled pilots and coordinate a nationwide investigation.

FBI Director Robert Mueller told a Senate panel last week that memo likely did not make it to high levels of the FBI or the CIA and that the agency should have made it a higher priority.

"This memo has emerged as one of the most significant and alarming warnings that the FBI had before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Grassley wrote. "It is essential that there be an outside review of this matter by your office to answer all outstanding questions, ensure accountability at the FBI and reaffirm the trust of the American people."




"We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or July of 2001" - A former FBI translator told the 9/11 commission that the bureau had detailed information well before Sept. 11, 2001, that terrorists were likely to attack the U.S. with airplanes. - A former FBI wiretap translator with top-secret security clearance, who has been called "very credible" by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has told Salon she recently testified to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States that the FBI had detailed information prior to Sept. 11, 2001, that a terrorist attack involving airplanes was being plotted.


Ouch.
on Dec 05, 2005
I guess the same as Bush in Aug 2001 when he got a report in Taxes that he ignored. Today Bush is the President and AFTER 9/11 he is not protecting us by ignoring many of the 9/11 commission recomendations. It is bad enough for BOTH Clinton and Bush to ignore the warnings BEFORE 9/11 but to ignore the danger the way Bush is today AFTER 9/11 is simply WRONG!
on Dec 05, 2005

I guess the same as Bush in Aug 2001 when he got a report in Taxes that he ignored. Today Bush is the President and AFTER 9/11 he is not protecting us by ignoring many of the 9/11 commission recomendations. It is bad enough for BOTH Clinton and Bush to ignore the warnings BEFORE 9/11 but to ignore the danger the way Bush is today AFTER 9/11 is simply WRONG!


You never really answered the question and yet you still continue to place all the blame on Bush. Sure hes not the best we've had, but hows about we point fingers at all those responsible not just those we hate. Or are you saying that Clinton can be forgiven for his mistake that, in part, lead to the 9/11 events and the death of 3000 people because he made one hell of a surplus for this country. Money talks I guess.
on Dec 05, 2005
This Blog is about the failure of Bush and Congress to follow the recomendations of the 9/11 commission. It has NOTHING to do with Clinton. It is the same story with the Bush supporters, Change The Subject or Attack the person. WHY has BUSH and CONGRESS not done all they can do to protect this nation per the 9/11 commission recomendations?
on Dec 05, 2005
Ignored is the wrong word to use, because that clearly hasn't been the case, but I actually agree that the pace of real change has been much too slow. Too much of the wall that was erected between the FBI & the CIA, so famously heightened by 9/11 Commissioner Gorelick when she was in the DOJ, remains in place. We do a great job of making sure Grandma doesn't accidently take her nail trimmers on board an airplane, but beyond that our border security remains way too lax. Bush deserves criticism for not pushing harder, though most of what needs to be done is the job of Congress.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Dec 05, 2005
Failure is what Kean and Hamilton said about Bush and Congress.
on Dec 05, 2005

This Blog is about the failure of Bush and Congress to follow the recomendations of the 9/11 commission. It has NOTHING to do with Clinton. It is the same story with the Bush supporters, Change The Subject or Attack the person. WHY has BUSH and CONGRESS not done all they can do to protect this nation per the 9/11 commission recomendations?


I made it about Slick Willie too when I asked my question. I told you I'd answer your question about GW just as soon as you answer mine. Which you have not done as of yet.
on Dec 05, 2005
The Bolg has NIOTHING to do with Clinton. We had not been attacked when Clinton was President. Now that we have been attacked to have Bush and Congress not protect the U S is the issue. That report is a stinging report on the failure of the GOP leadership in BOTH Congress and the White House. This country needs a BIG change in leadership in Congress and in the White House.
on Dec 05, 2005
We had not been attacked when Clinton was President.


Then the sailors who died aboard the Cole meant how much to you? Let me refresh your memory, Colonel...
From Wikipedia:

On October 12, 2000, USS Cole came to the harbor of Aden, Yemen for a routine fuel stop. Cole completed mooring at 09:30. Refueling started at 10:30. At 11:18 local time (08:18 UTC), a small craft approached the port side of the destroyer, and an explosion occurred, putting a 40-by-40-foot (12 m-by-12 m) gash in the ship's port side. The crew fought flooding in the engineering spaces and had the damage under control by the evening. Divers inspected the hull and said the keel was not damaged.

Seventeen sailors were killed and 39 others were injured in the blast. The injured sailors were taken to the United States Army's Landstuhl Regional Medical Center near Ramstein, Germany, and later to the U.S.

The attack, organized by Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist organization, was carried out by suicide bombers Ibrahim al-Thawr and Abdullah al-Misawa.


17 dead and Clinton's watch was not attacked? Or are you just ignoring the threats?
on Dec 06, 2005
We had not been attacked when Clinton was President


Oh really fool? Tell that to these dead. You really should do your research before you say something dumb.


June 1996 terrorist attack on Khobar Towers near Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, that killed 19 U.S. airmen and wounded 500 more.
on Dec 06, 2005
We were not attacked in the U S prior to 9/11 since Dec 7, 1941. My point and the point of the report is valid.
Bush and the leadership in Congress is NOT doing what is needed to protect the United States. WHY? Just provide an answer to that question.
on Dec 06, 2005
We were not attacked in the U S prior to 9/11 since Dec 7, 1941.


The first Trade Towers bombing left six Americans dead on 26 Feb 93.
Link

The American Embassy bombings 8th Aug 1997, killed 80 (14 Americans) and wounded over 1,700. The last time I checked American Embassies are considered American Soil.
Link

The Iran Hostages happened on US Embassy Grounds for 444 days in 1979-1980.
Link

How often must we turn the other cheek before fighting back? I guess for you Gene, it takes 3000 lives. I personally would not like to have been one of those killed before 911. Maybe we should have done something back when they were only taking hostages.
on Dec 06, 2005

We were not attacked in the U S prior to 9/11 since Dec 7, 1941


WRONG AGAIN clueless! Would you like me to go find the laws covering our embassies? They ARE U.S. territories! Even "if" you're talking CONUS you seem to be forgetting Lee1776's example.

The first Trade Towers bombing left six Americans dead on 26 Feb 93.


Now try again and do "try" to put some thought into it this time.
on Dec 07, 2005
Now try again and do "try" to put some thought into it this time.


Don't be so hard on the guy, his hatred for Bush is so powerful it actually creates a filter when he uses google to show only what he wants to see. Too many bullets to the head if you ask me.
2 Pages1 2