they found 500 wmds in iraq how many more did they need to find

"They found 500 wmds in Iraq how many more did they need to find”

They were old gas filled Artillery Shells that posed no danger to anyone in the United States. In fact they most likely could not have been used effectively even in Iraq.

they were weapons that were supposed to have been destroyed.

you keep missing the evidence.

Syria has the gas weapons.

Iran has the nukes.

Saddam was the one who kept kicking them out when ever they wanted to inspect someplace that was off limits to them.

why were these places off limits to them if Saddam didn't have any wmd's to be found


now answer my question

how many people are you willing to sacrifice for peace. 5, 10, 500, or the million or so people in Israel.

Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, July 07, 2007
They were old gas filled Artillery Shells that posed no danger to anyone in the United States. In fact they most likely could not have been used effectively even in Iraq.


they were weapons that were supposed to have been destroyed.

you keep missing the evidence.

Syria has the gas weapons.

Iran has the nukes.


There is NOT one scrap of evidence of that! The Intelligence agreed that Saddam had old gas filled Artillery shells. The Intelligence also said he had no Nuclear weapons or program. That has been proven after looking in Iraq for 4 1/2 years. All the Mushroom Cloud BS that Bush and Cheney used to scare Americans was a LIE and they knew it was a LIE when they told us we were in danger from Saddam’s nuclear weapons. There were none and the intelligence said so which Bush and Cheney IGNORED!



how many people are you willing to sacrifice for peace. 5, 10, 500, or the million or so people in Israel.

My answer is ZERO. I only would risk the lives of our people if there was a just reason and then use our military power in such a war as to insure victory. That is just what we DID NOT do in Iraq.

First, there was no danger to the United States that warranted sending our military into Iraq.Second, when we made the mistake of invading Iraq we did not provide the manpower to do the job. We had enough troops to depose Saddam but not even close to the number needed to prevent the Civil War and the foreign terrorists from tearing Iraq apart!

As far as Israel is concerned all the dead on both sides that have been sacrificed has not moved us closer to a settlement that would END the Killing!

Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, July 07, 2007
If Bush had allowed the UN weapons Inspectors to finish their work


Saddam was the one who kept kicking them out when ever they wanted to inspect someplace that was off limits to them.

The UN weapons Inspectors were prevented for completing their work by Bush and the Invasion of Iraq.

give it up that was the last demand that bush made before we invaded.

that Saddam allow the inspectors back into the country.

he didn't and we invaded.

also if he didn't have any weapons then why did the government of Iraq announce that if we invaded they would use those weapons that they didn't have. it was too late for bluffs.