Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.


The release of the NIE documents that al-Qaeda and similar groups have expanded their operations and ability to carry our attacks against the U.S. It also clearly demonstrates that simply ending al-Qaeda operations in Iraq will not change the level of danger from futurte attacks on the U.S.

Below are changes we have made to help prevent another attack on the U.S.:

Increased cooperation and surveillance by domestic agencies like the FBI, NSA, and CIA.

We have substantially improved data sharing with both our own agencies and with law enforcement and intelligence agencies thought the world.

We have solicited the help of banks, communications companies and alike to track potential terrorists.


Areas where we have not done what is needed or that our actions have increased the threat of future attacks:

Failed to safeguard our borders and ports.

Failed to provide the needed funding for first responders.

Failed to destroy the al-Qaeda operations especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Diverted our resources to Iraq that has enabled al-Qaeda et al to have yet another base of operation in Iraq.

Provided a recruiting tool to radical Islam by invading and occupying Iraq.

Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Jul 19, 2007
Congress has the power to declare war not the President. They in essence did that with the Iraq War Resolution. They could revoke that prior law or just say the war is over and therefore the funding will end.


then let them do that. but let them stop playing politics with the lives of our troops.


i take it you didn't stay up and watch the senate. i did and almost ever Dem. i watched was politicing not caring about the troops or the people.
on Jul 19, 2007
then let them do that. but let them stop playing politics with the lives of our troops.


They are trying. It is the GOP and Bush that are creating the problem. They may have NO choice but to place restrictions on the DoD funding and if Bush vetoes the appropriations they need to simply change the bill number pass the SAME bill and continue sending the Will of Congress to Bush. At some point the spending authority will end and Bush will have no choice buy bring the troops home. We need an up or down vote NOW! That will be up to the GOP.
on Jul 19, 2007
cant win by the rules. so it is now time to change the rules.
on Jul 19, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2007
cant win by the rules. so it is now time to change the rules.

The issue is not the rules. It is voting on the funding for the military.
on Jul 19, 2007
cant win by the rules. so it is now time to change the rules.


on Jul 19, 2007

Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2007
cant win by the rules. so it is now time to change the rules.

BS all you want- The Bottom line is what the GOP is doing will prevent the funding of American Troops. Without a vote Congress can not appropriate the funds for the military after Sept 30, 2007! The GOP will have to choose between their rules and the money the troops need. Let's see what is more important!
on Jul 20, 2007
EVERY news agency is saying the very same thing. You are full of BS. All you can ever say is if its is a liberal newspaper or TV network by your definition they misrepresent the truth. It is Bush and his spin doctors that twist the truth. The NIE clearly shows Bush has failed to reduce the threat from al-Qaeda. The Sec of Homeland Security is running around warning of another attack on the U.S. this summer. How is that possible if we have destroyed al-Qaeda?


So NOW you're saying that the newspapers know more about what's going on than our own Intel? What a MORON. The papers do NOT know everything.

I refer you to reply #15
on Jul 20, 2007
BS all you want- The Bottom line is what the GOP is doing will prevent the funding of American Troops. Without a vote Congress can not appropriate the funds for the military after Sept 30, 2007! The GOP will have to choose between their rules and the money the troops need. Let's see what is more important!



they can have a vote within the rules.


what is this the 3rd or 4th time that the democrats have tried to change the rules.

lets see.

1 congress tried to take over the military.

2 congress tried to make it where a tax increase was automatic ie no vote.

3 can't get the proper number of votes, so change the rules so that we can.

4 congress tried to take over the military again.
on Jul 20, 2007
the democrats for six years blocked everything in the senate.

held 200 judges hostage, ie would only allow votes on letting them serve if the president or the republicans in the senate would give up something. and now they and you are crying because the shoe is on the other foot. that's right i know why nothing was done from 2004 to 2006.
on Jul 20, 2007

"So NOW you're saying that the newspapers know more about what's going on than our own Intel?"
They have reported the Intel. You just do like what the Intel says!

The other BS is that Democrats want to change the rules in the Senate. That is also BS. , The Senate can pass a bill with a single vote IF THE SENATORS ALLOW IT TO COME TO A VOTE! What the GOP is scared of is that they know the majority of the Senate support ending the Iraq War. So they use the 60 votes required to cut off debate and VOTE. If the GOP does not allow the funding bills to be voted on in the Senate, it is the GOP that will be denying our military the funding the need! If Bush vetoes funding bills passed by Congress it will be Bush who denies the funding to our military.
on Jul 20, 2007
If the GOP does not allow the funding bills to be voted on in the Senate, it is the GOP that will be denying our military the funding the need! If Bush vetoes funding bills passed by Congress it will be Bush who denies the funding to our military.


LOL.  Look how you spin this.  Propaganda is all this is.
on Jul 20, 2007
. Look how you spin this. Propaganda is all this is.

This is NOT SPIN. It is the reality of the situation. There is NO requirement to have 60 votes in the Senate to pass any bill. If the GOP falls back on this option, they will stop the funding of our troops!
on Jul 20, 2007
This is NOT SPIN. It is the reality of the situation.


It's your usual spin.  Democrats are the ones who want to stop funding the troops.  That is reality.


on Jul 20, 2007
“It's your usual spin. Democrats are the ones who want to stop funding the troops. That is reality.”

No the Democrats want to remove our troops from Iraq as do the vast majority of Americans. They will pass the support for the troops just not for the continuation of the Bush war in Iraq!
on Jul 20, 2007
vast majority of Americans


you know what idiot the term vast means at least more than 75%.

the most they could get to agree on anything in the last poll was 71%. and that was for a positive withdrawal from iraq. ie iraq can stand on its own. or the violence has been stopped that kind of thing.

only 61% wanted to cut and run like you do.

and 61% is far from being a vast anything.
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5