Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.

Between March 2001 and 9/10/2001 George Tenet brought warnings to the White House, Rice and the Security Council that al-Qaeda was planning an attack on the United States. He documents those warnings in his book, At the CENTER of the STORM. Many of these warnings were given a 100% confidence rating by the CIA. In every warning, the CIA said these attacks were being planned by bin Laden and al-Qaeda. There was NO involvement of Saddam or Iraq. The CIA also documented that it was bin Laden and al-Qaeda that had been responsible for the 1st attack on Twin Towers, the Marine Barracks and the Cole. Again there was NO involvement of Iraq or Saddam of those attacks.

Prior to 9/11 Bush and the entire Security Council which was lead by Rice did NOTHING to act on the many CIA warnings that Tenet himself warned about.

It is one thing to be unaware of a possible attack and quite another to IGNORE the warnings from the agency that is charged with proving intelligence to the President and the Security Council. For Bush and Rice to not act on warnings brought from the Director of the CIA is CRIMINAL. No one can say that if Bush and Rice had acted on the warnings that 9/11 would not have happened. But to IGNOIRE these warnings is dereliction of duty on the part of Bush and Rice.

After 9/11 and the confirmation by the CIA that the attack on 9/11 was conducted by bin Laden and al-Qaeda, Bush attacks Iraq who had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or the other attacks on our country! Bush and Rice had the responsibility to PROTECT this country and to ignore the specific warnings from the CIA Director is criminal. Both should be IMPEACHED for their failure to act on those warnings and do all they could to protect America!

Comments (Page 5)
8 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last
on Aug 27, 2007
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, August 27, 2007
“If for six months you received warnings that a gang was about to attack you and your family what would you do? If you did NOTHING and one day that gang attacked and killed members of your family I guess you would say you acted properly? You were not told when and where so what could you do? BS!!!! You would argue that you did all you could to protect your family. IN A PIGS EYE!


. What a ridiculous analogy. I guess we could apply that to Iraq that had planned to assassinate a U.S. President, attacked our planes on an almost daily basis. How many times before we should act? !” I BET when the threat was made against Bush 41, the Secret Service took action!

Once again there was no actionable intelligence on Sept. 11. You can look at various other committees and studies that said the same thing. There was a problem with our intelligence agencies way before Bush, and the Gorelick situation was one of those.” True but Bush was President on 9/11 and ignored warnings of that attack for 6 months!


That is BS. When the Director of the CIA tells the President we need to go on a WAR FOOTING and the President does not act, the President is irresponsible. My analogy is RIGHT ON. The problem it is so right on YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT TO DEFEND THE INACTION OF BUSH. When you receive the Presidential daily Brief entitled, “Bin Laden determined to attack the U.S. what did GWB do? Continued his vacation in Texas. He should been back in Washington that same day insisting that all the law enforcement agencies in this country were doing everything possible to prevent such an attack. Anyone that defends how Bush and Rice handled the continual threats to this country between March and Sept 2001 shows just how stupid and misguided they are. The security of our country is JOB ONE for the President. HE FAILED JOB ONE and then was elected by 52% of the people who voted in 2004. HOW LAME IS THAT? Anyone that has a job and FAILS their principal task gets fired. Time to Fire Bush and his inept administration.
on Aug 27, 2007
Island Dog

"Once again there was no actionable intelligence on Sept. 11."

We had multiple threats from a group of terrorists that had attacked us at least three times before; the proper response by Bush is to do NOTHING! ARE YOU NUTS?
on Aug 27, 2007
As usual, Gene refuses to respond to direct criticism because he can't. Demands everybody prove him wrong then ignores challenges.

As luck would have it, I just yesterday came across the perfect description of Gene in Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco:

"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idee fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense..."

Had no idea Umberto Eco knew Gene.
on Aug 27, 2007
Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Monday, August 27, 2007
As usual, Gene refuses to respond to direct criticism because he can't. Demands everybody prove him wrong then ignores challenges.

As luck would have it, I just yesterday came across the perfect description of Gene in Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco:

"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idee fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense..."

Had no idea Umberto Eco knew Gene.


LOOK in the MIRROR Daiwa-- That is YOU!!!!!
on Aug 27, 2007
I just yesterday came across the perfect description of Gene in Foucault's Pendulum

LOOK in the MIRROR Daiwa-- That is YOU!!!!!


Brilliant comeback, what a blistering verbal parry... so, Gene is rubber and Daiwa is glue? ::
on Aug 27, 2007
I never blamed Bush for, "any and all types of disasters".


LOL, that is the biggest BS Col has every posted on this site. Col, you blame Bush for everything, one way or another.
on Aug 27, 2007
We had multiple threats from a group of terrorists that had attacked us at least three times before; the proper response by Bush is to do NOTHING! ARE YOU NUTS?


You are seriously deranged. There have been threats for how many years before Sept. 11 gene?  For the third time do you understand the mess our intelligence agencies were because of obstacles people like Gorelick put in place?  It's so easy for you to sit back and whine that "Bush had a warning and did nothing".  Well like all your posts it's pure BS!

Let's take a big guess and wonder who here would have been the first person complaining that Bush was being too strict and being a "dictator" by placing severe security measures in place. 

You are a classic case of BDS where you take nothing else into consideration except Bush.  Nothing else gene, it's all about Bush and how you come up with some vague reason to blame him for something else.  You need to get a life and seek help from a professional.


on Aug 27, 2007
You are seriously deranged. There have been threats for how many years before Sept. 11 gene? NO YOU ARE THE ONE DERANGED!!!!!


When the CIA Director says we need to go to WAR FOOTING and Bush does nothing, Bush is NOT DONG HIS JOB TO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY. When Bush gets PDB that is entitled, Bin Laden determined to attack U.S. and he continues with his vacation and takes no action, the President IS NOT DOING HIS JOB!When Bush tries to hide the July 11, 2001 warning that we should go on a WAR FOOTING the question is WHY?
on Aug 27, 2007
I'm in a generous mood. Let's try one last time: Gene, please explain exactly what you mean by "war footing" - tell us exactly what the President could have done. And tell us exactly what indicates the President has failed to protect America if you're not talking about 9/11, which you insist you're not. I'm afraid Eco has you nailed.
on Aug 27, 2007
When the CIA Director says we need to go to WAR FOOTING and Bush does nothing,


LOL.  This "warfooting" term you are using would have not stopped Sept. 11. 



When Bush gets PDB that is entitled, Bin Laden determined to attack U.S. and he continues with his vacation and takes no action, the President IS NOT DOING HIS JOB!


LOL.  Aren't these liberal talking points from years ago?  His "vacation", and let's remember you don't stop being President while on vacation, had no impact at all on what happened on Sept. 11.  You are seriously just grasping at straws.  You keep ignoring everything else that is being brought up to you.  You are a fraud.


When Bush tries to hide the July 11, 2001 warning that we should go on a WAR FOOTING the question is WHY?


Can you show us where Bush was trying to "hide" this "warning"? 


on Aug 27, 2007
NO YOU ARE THE ONE DERANGED!!!!!


Col, I think you have dug yourself such a deep hole that even your name calling is like trying to throw a rock out of that hole but it comes right back down and bops you on the head.

But then again that must be Bush's fault as well.
on Aug 27, 2007
Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Monday, August 27, 2007
I'm in a generous mood. Let's try one last time: Gene, please explain exactly what you mean by "war footing" - tell us exactly what the President could have done. And tell us exactly what indicates the President has failed to protect America if you're not talking about 9/11, which you insist you're not. I'm afraid Eco has you nailed.


Mobilized all law enforcement agencies to be on the look out for any activity, especially by Moslems, and insure agencies such as the FBI< CIA< ICE< and DoD agencies were doing everything possible to identify and possible actions that were suspicious.

Coordinate with intelligence and law enforcement of other countries.

Coordinate input from financial institutions both in this country and abroad.

Move to control entry along our borders with the active military or the National Guard.

BUSH IGNORED both the July 11th warnings as well as the PDB on August 6th that clearly said Ben Laden was about to attack the U.S.. Given the fact they had done so three times before, WHY would Bush do nothing?
on Aug 27, 2007
Can you show us where Bush was trying to "hide" this "warning"?


They did not provide this to the 9/11 Commission which was to be provided all relevant facts leading up to the attack. This warning was one of the MOST important warnings and recommendations from the CIA. It took the Press to make the Commission and the public aware of this meeting!
on Aug 27, 2007
Mobilized all law enforcement agencies to be on the look out for any activity, especially by Moslems, and insure agencies such as the FBI< CIA< ICE< and DoD agencies were doing everything possible to identify and possible actions that were suspicious.

They were already doing everything Congress permitted (see Gorelick, Jamie).

Coordinate with intelligence and law enforcement of other countries.

Ditto.

Coordinate input from financial institutions both in this country and abroad.

Ditto.

Move to control entry along our borders with the active military or the National Guard.

Ditto. There was no authority to implement marshal law.

The best you can come up with are banal generalities that you know were not possible at the time. Sorry, no cigar.
on Aug 27, 2007
Mobilized all law enforcement agencies to be on the look out for any activity, especially by Moslems, and insure agencies such as the FBI< CIA< ICE< and DoD agencies were doing everything possible to identify and possible actions that were suspicious.


LOL.  Gene is advocating racial profiling.  If Bush did this you would have been the first one to complain about it.  This is too funny.


BUSH IGNORED both the July 11th warnings as well as the PDB on August 6th that clearly said Ben Laden was about to attack the U.S.. Given the fact they had done so three times before, WHY would Bush do nothing?


Ignored is what you do here.  As it's been told to you over three times, there was intelligence problems dating way back.  There is nothing significant Bush could have done to stop Sept. 11. 

You are getting more and more pathetic with each Bush posting.  You really need some help.
8 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last