Reply By: Island DogPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 The NIE speaks for itself. It says what Bush has been ranting about is not valid! When Bush says this new Intel makes no difference he shows himself to be a fool and no one believes what he says. He has ZERO credibility as the leader of our country! And you have zero credibility as an author.

That is not what unbiased people have said that have read my book. In fact they said just the opposite. I used facts and the expert opinions of the most creditable and knowledgeable people on the issues I covered. It is true that the results do not reflect well on Bush and his policies. I did not create the facts or expert opinions. I simply looked at what are the results of the policies we have been following since Bush took office!

Suddenly, NIE's are gospel to Gene. Strange that they were previously trash when they didn't jive with his prejudices. The apparatus that he claims "cooked" the intelligence before now is to be trusted completely. What a joke.

AFter Bush' presidency, I have come to believe there is no more America as I knew it. America now is the new Rome which sends her Legions for personal campaigns of it's leaders.

This does not offend me as much as Bush trying to veil it that this war was done for the good of mankind. I would respect Bush more if he just called a spade a spade and said "We are going to secure resources for the benefit or our empire".

Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Thursday, December 06, 2007Suddenly, NIE's are gospel to Gene. Strange that they were previously trash when they didn't jive with his prejudices. The apparatus that he claims "cooked" the intelligence before now is to be trusted completely. What a joke.

What a JOKE is Bush. No matter what the Intel says if it does not agree with what HE wants to do, he ignores it. We are spending over $12 Billion per year to develop this Intel and Bush acts as if it does not exist. There was Intel in 2002-2003 that said the WMD claims of Bush and Cheney were not correct. Bush IGNORED ALL OF THEM. It was just like the warnings by the CIA that bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were about to attack the U.S. that Bush Ignored.

gene doesn't care about facts as long as he can use it against bush.

Numbnuts -

There is a difference between "there was intel" and "NIE" but the distinction is lost on you because you don't care about "truth" (the biggest joke about your blog).

Still going with that lie, huh?

Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, December 06, 2007gene doesn't care about facts as long as he can use it against bush.

I just sighted FACTS! Your problem is that ANY facts that show Bush did not act properly or that his policies have not worked you reject!

Reply By: Island DogPosted: Thursday, December 06, 2007 It was just like the warnings by the CIA that bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were about to attack the U.S. that Bush Ignored. Still going with that lie, huh?

What Lies? The CIA provided numerous warnings from March to 5 Sept 2001 that Bush IGNORED! Tenet documented those warnings in his book which I have sighted! Are you saying that George Tenet lied about those warnings? He also quoted other top CIA officials who attended those meetings with Bush and Rice. I guess they were not telling the truth. The Presidential Daily Brief the White House Released from Aug 2001 was also a lie I guess? You are full of BS!

no my problem is that you twist all facts to bash bush



according to fox iran stopped working on nukes in 2003 because they didn't want to be next. in other words if we hadn't invaded iraq, iran would still be working on their nuke or they would have one.

yes AL quida was going to attack the united states someplace, some where in country. what you keep failing to tell us is what was bush supposed to do. oh right tell the police to look for something suspicious. well guess what that is already the job of the police.


and it was Clinton that made it illegal for the CIA and FBI to talk to each other.


it was Clinton that allowed AL quida to escape his attack by letting their allies the Iranians and the taliban that we were going to attack. and don't give me crap about missiles and acts of war.


you want to invade an Allie in order to kill bin laden. but you want to protect the borders of an enemy.

can someone tell me what is wrong with this picture.

if he quotes like you quote they wouldn't have to lie

Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, December 06, 2007 I just sighted FACTS! Your problem is that ANY facts that show Bush did not act properly or that his policies have not worked you reject! no my problem is that you twist all facts to bash bush

That is a LIE- I do not twist anything!

ColGene is to Prs. Bush as Rev. Phelps is to Homosexuals. ;~D

For the last time gene.....i'ts CITED!

As has been pointed out to you numerous times gene, the warning were vague and there wasn't much that could have done to stop the attacks.  I would bet anything Bush would have done you would have complained about anyways.




Of course you do.  You are one of the biggest propagandists I have ever seen.

i didn't say you twisted anything. i said you twist everything. you have even tried to twist things i have said.