No, they put in the poison pill of a withdrawal date, that the president said he would not allow. It was also unconstitutional so your guys were breaking the law, should we remove them from office?

and once again you failed to answer my questions.

i never said it was ok or not ok with that post

they are there so you can call them baby killers as the rest of the demos and liberals are doing or haven't you been hearing this


and no i am not really saying you said that but then i don't know what everything you have said is

No, they put in the poison pill of a withdrawal date, that the president said he would not allow. It was also unconstitutional so your guys were breaking the law, should we remove them from office?

SHOW me the Supreme court Ruling that says what Congress included in the Iraq funding bill is unconstitutional?

Bush is responsible for over 3,300 dead American Troops and 25,000 injuries. They would not be dead or injured if Bush had not started this war!

how do you know what would have happened if

it has to get by the president before it goes to the supreme court. what an idiot

congress pays

president commands

Reply By: danielost Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007
Bush is responsible for over 3,300 dead American Troops and 25,000 injuries. They would not be dead or injured if Bush had not started this war!


How do you know what would have happened if
If we had not invaded Iraq we would not have had the dead and injured in a war that did not take place. YES Bush is responsible for the dead and injured. Congress did not insist we invade Iraq that was BUSH!

congress pays

president commands

Bush could NOT command his way out of a paper bag!

if we had not invaded iraq then al quida would have attacked the usa again

if we had not invaded iraq nothing would have happened

if we had not invaded iraq the whole world which has hated us for at least 30 years would now love us

if al gore had been elected president we would now be a muslim nation

if this then that

if that then this


and i didn't say anything about bush's ability to command

i said that the congress pays

and the president commands

ie congress cannot set a date for the withdraw of the troops from anywhere

but they can cut funding for a war

oh and the military on it's own is lowering the wages of non-combatants not in iraq to pay those in iraq

"If we had not invaded Iraq then al Qaeda would have attacked the us again" al Qaeda and the attack on 9/11 had NOTHING to do with Iraq. We had invaded Afghanistan but we NEVER committed the troop level needed to deal with ALL the al Qaeda in Afghanistan because Bush sent then into Iraq. The only reason al Qaeda is operating in IRAQ TODAY IS BECAUSE WE INVEDED Iraq AND COULD NOT PREVENT THEM FROM SETTING UO SHOP ON Iraq!

"If we had not invaded Iraq the whole world which has hated us for at least 30 years would now love us" Our invasion and occupation of Iraq had made the Hate that existed before our invasion much worse. That is what our own intelligence agencies have said in the NIE.

If al gore had been elected president we would now be a Muslim nation YOU do not know what you are talking. YOU ARE AN a*s.

oh and the military on it's own is lowering the wages of non-combatants not in Iraq to pay those in Iraq"

With the leadership, or lack of it, from Bush they were sent into a war that was not justified, without the needed equipment and without the numbers needed to accomplish the mission. When they come home injured Bush has not requested enough funding to properly deal with the number that needs care. Both facilities like Walter Reed and the VA are very much under funded by the Commander-in-Chief. Bush is the militaries WORST enemy. Bush has all but destroyed the Army, Marines, Army National Guard and Army Reserve.

is a 50 year old hosiptal and your going to blame the whole thing on bush

when did bush have any direct control of walter reed

it was clinton that cut funding to the military every year he was in office

and it was clinton that sent the troops on missions unarmed

and it was clinton that used missiles and didn't replace them

and i heard one of the lead democrats say last week that if the president vetoed that bill. he would not vote for any replacement equipment for the military in iraq

Nice try, and it would work if I was as ignorant of the constitution as you seem to be. Wars are the responsibility of the President. Only the President can send troops to war, and only the President can order them into battle or bring them home. Congress can cut funding, impeach the President, and make recommendations but that is it, unless they make an amendment to the constitution changing the laws we use to govern. Show me in the constitution where the congress fights a war.

You don't lie well enough to pull this one off. First, AQ was in Iraq before we invaded Afghanistan and they tried to set up a base of operations when we invaded Afghanistan. One of the reasons given for the invasion Iraq, I and others have told you this for months in your blogs but you refuse to even acknowledge those statements and once again you lie to give you the cover to ignore the facts and push your lies.

col gene and sean are just following the democrat book keep saying the same lies until everyone believes you


and col gene what about that redistribution of wealth you know the 300,000