Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on August 28, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


On August 24th I posted this Blog which elicited many truly asinine comments that demonstrate the hypocrisy of many who Blog on Joe User-




Bush & Rice Should be Impeached for NOT Protecting America!

The United States spends Billions of dollars each year to collect and process intelligence for one propose—To provide the President and National Security Advisor information to help defend this country from attack.

In my Blog I documented scores of such warnings provided Bush and Rice by the CIA in the six months before the 9/11 attack on our country. When I pointed out that these warnings were ignored by both Bush and Rice, many on this site defended the inaction of the President and National Security Advisor. Statements such as there was no actionable intelligence were presented. In fact the CIA warnings identified the group that was planning the attacks, they said they were near term and in some cases even identified the use of air planes as missiles that they planned to use in their attack. The only thing they did not contain was the exact date and place. Others claimed the information George Tenet presented about all the warnings was just fluff for his book. This despite those warnings were the end result of thousands of people we employed to do just want they did - providing warnings that Bush and Rice ignored. We should have saved the money and effort because the intended use of the intelligence gathered and presented to the President and his principal security advisor was IGNORED.

In addition, this intelligence and the warnings were NOT presented to the appropriate intelligence committees in Congress at the time for any needed legislative action to help protect our country. In fact the most important warning was kept secret for over 5 years. That warning was provided by the CIA Director on July 11, 2001 that said the danger was so great that the United States needed to be placed on a WAR FOOTING in order to try and prevent Bin Laden from carrying out his intended attacks on our country.

Bottom line the President and National Security Advisor failed to act on the CIA warnings and, as we all know, Bin Laden was successful in attacking our country on Sept 11, 2001. Thus all the warnings that Bush and Rice ignored and failed to provide to Congress were CORRECT! When I document this many on this Blog Site either attack me or attempt to discredit the warnings provided by the multi billion dollar intelligence agency that exists for the express purpose of providing the very information that Bush and Rice IGNORED! WHAT HYPOCRACY on the part of anyone that would defend the failure of Bush and Rice to fulfill their NUMBER ONE responsibility - the security of America!

Comments (Page 3)
11 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Aug 28, 2007
hmmm careful Col, your rocks might cause a cave in.
on Aug 28, 2007
hmmm careful Col, your rocks might cause a cave in.


too late his mind has already caved in
on Aug 28, 2007
It's interesting to note that Gene's idea of hypocrisy is to have his unsubstantiated bald-faced accusation of high crimes & misdemeaners challenged by anyone. The fact that we've done so successfully is what prompted this whining, sniveling post. All he's done is confirm the intellectual bankruptcy from which he suffers.
on Aug 28, 2007
bop
on Aug 28, 2007

Reply By: CharlesCS1 Posted: Tuesday, August 28, 2007
If Bush had acted and all law enforcement and Intelligence agencies were aware of the CIA Warnings, we would have had a better chance to connect the dots.


So when you say better chance does that mean if 9/11 would have happened anyways you would not be accusing Bush of doing nothing? You dope, BSer.

The point you do not seem to grasp is we are spending over $14 Billion dollars EVERY YEAR and employing thousands of people to produce intelligence for the President who ignores the results of all that effort. I do not know if we could have prevented 9/11 but by doing nothing we all know what happened on 9/11.
on Aug 28, 2007
If Bush had acted and all law enforcement and Intelligence agencies were aware of the CIA Warnings, we would have had a better chance to connect the dots. Bush and Rice IGNORED what we spent Billions of Dollars to provide. Intelligence never gives the exact time and place of coming events. However to ignore the types of warnings the CIA gave Bush and Rice is criminal and as 9/11 proved the warnings the CIA gave Bush which he Ignored were accurate!


True the CIA had some great leads however the wall prevented anyone being able to act quick enough. As posted on your other article here is a fun link:

WWW Link

bop
on Aug 28, 2007


The point you do not seem to grasp is we are spending over $14 Billion dollars EVERY YEAR and employing thousands of people to produce intelligence for the President who ignores the results of all that effort. I do not know if we could have prevented 9/11 but by doing nothing we all know what happened on 9/11.


No Col we got your point but the problem is you are blaming (once again) the wrong person. Read the link I provided!

It goes into detail that YES we had the info but because of late 99 we put an information wall between the FBI and CIA and as a result THEY (FBI and CIA) couldn't get their job done.

Bush had been in office how long when this happened? not 9 months. HARDLY enough time to fix the 1999 act.
on Aug 28, 2007
The point you do not seem to grasp is we are spending over $14 Billion dollars EVERY YEAR and employing thousands of people to produce intelligence for the President who ignores the results of all that effort. I do not know if we could have prevented 9/11 but by doing nothing we all know what happened on 9/11.


Bravo Col for keeping your attitude in check on this reply. It's dificult to read one of your replies without the caps on.

I though we were talking about the information from between "March thru 4 Sept 2001". What does the 14 billion you claim we waste have to do with "March thru 4 Sept 2001"? Do you ever stick to one topic or point without jumping back and forth thru time?

Every cosnidered writing a real book Col? You would be great at conspiracy novels and SciFi? Politics is definitely not for you. Does your wife get any sex from you anymore? I have to wonder since your replies show the stress you endure while posting replies on this site. Stress is bad for sex.
on Aug 28, 2007
The point you do not seem to grasp is we are spending over $14 Billion dollars EVERY YEAR


No, wait. My bad, didn't notice the caps on this part. Silly me.
on Aug 28, 2007
Reply By: Adventure-Dude Posted: Tuesday, August 28, 2007
If Bush had acted and all law enforcement and Intelligence agencies were aware of the CIA Warnings, we would have had a better chance to connect the dots. Bush and Rice IGNORED what we spent Billions of Dollars to provide. Intelligence never gives the exact time and place of coming events. However to ignore the types of warnings the CIA gave Bush and Rice is criminal and as 9/11 proved the warnings the CIA gave Bush which he Ignored were accurate!


True the CIA had some great leads however the wall prevented anyone being able to act quickly enough. As posted on your other article here is a fun lin


That was true but is has NOTHING to do with the fact that Bush and Rice ignored REPEATED WARNINGS WE WERE ABOUT TO BE ATTACKED BY al-Qaeda.
on Aug 28, 2007

Reply By: CharlesCS1 Posted: Tuesday, August 28, 2007
The point you do not seem to grasp is we are spending over $14 Billion dollars EVERY YEAR


No, wait. My bad, didn't notice the caps on this part. Silly me.


How does the use of caps change the fact we spend $14 billion dollars every year to produce intelligence that Bush ignored?
on Aug 28, 2007
That was true but is has NOTHING to do with the fact that Bush and Rice ignored REPEATED WARNINGS WE WERE ABOUT TO BE ATTACKED BY al-Qaeda.


The problem is your definition of "ignore" is different than everyone else's.  You still have not addressed the "wall" that was put up in the late 90's, nor have you addressed the fact that the CIA was inept when dealing with terrorism.  You conveniently ignore things like this while babbling about the usual nonsense.

As I said, there is more to counter-terrorism and law enforcement operations than what you read in the headlines.  For you to say "nothing" was done is foolish, quite typical for your posts though.
on Aug 28, 2007
new post
on Aug 28, 2007
That was true but is has NOTHING to do with the fact that Bush and Rice ignored REPEATED WARNINGS WE WERE ABOUT TO BE ATTACKED BY al-Qaeda.


Col, go read the article.

The FBI agent couldn't get the information he needed for any actionable defense to prevent the attack on the Pentagon.

bop
bop

on Aug 28, 2007
That was true but is has NOTHING to do with the fact that Bush and Rice ignored REPEATED WARNINGS WE WERE ABOUT TO BE ATTACKED BY al-Qaeda.


Please explain which of the 14,000 threats the intel community gets each month are the ones we should act upon right now? you point out the five or six threats received over a year in the white noise of 168,000 threats dealing with attacks on the US and its leaders by vaarious groups and nations.

Please teach us all how it is done so we can better protect ourselves. It is obvious you have much more experience than the people doing the job have. Oh,wait, you never worked in the Intel field like I did or the thousands of federal employees have done. You have no specific training in dealing with these threats. You have no experience in weeding out real from fake, or good from bad. Your sole experience in intelligence has been avoiding any and all intelligence.
11 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last