Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on August 28, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


On August 24th I posted this Blog which elicited many truly asinine comments that demonstrate the hypocrisy of many who Blog on Joe User-




Bush & Rice Should be Impeached for NOT Protecting America!

The United States spends Billions of dollars each year to collect and process intelligence for one propose—To provide the President and National Security Advisor information to help defend this country from attack.

In my Blog I documented scores of such warnings provided Bush and Rice by the CIA in the six months before the 9/11 attack on our country. When I pointed out that these warnings were ignored by both Bush and Rice, many on this site defended the inaction of the President and National Security Advisor. Statements such as there was no actionable intelligence were presented. In fact the CIA warnings identified the group that was planning the attacks, they said they were near term and in some cases even identified the use of air planes as missiles that they planned to use in their attack. The only thing they did not contain was the exact date and place. Others claimed the information George Tenet presented about all the warnings was just fluff for his book. This despite those warnings were the end result of thousands of people we employed to do just want they did - providing warnings that Bush and Rice ignored. We should have saved the money and effort because the intended use of the intelligence gathered and presented to the President and his principal security advisor was IGNORED.

In addition, this intelligence and the warnings were NOT presented to the appropriate intelligence committees in Congress at the time for any needed legislative action to help protect our country. In fact the most important warning was kept secret for over 5 years. That warning was provided by the CIA Director on July 11, 2001 that said the danger was so great that the United States needed to be placed on a WAR FOOTING in order to try and prevent Bin Laden from carrying out his intended attacks on our country.

Bottom line the President and National Security Advisor failed to act on the CIA warnings and, as we all know, Bin Laden was successful in attacking our country on Sept 11, 2001. Thus all the warnings that Bush and Rice ignored and failed to provide to Congress were CORRECT! When I document this many on this Blog Site either attack me or attempt to discredit the warnings provided by the multi billion dollar intelligence agency that exists for the express purpose of providing the very information that Bush and Rice IGNORED! WHAT HYPOCRACY on the part of anyone that would defend the failure of Bush and Rice to fulfill their NUMBER ONE responsibility - the security of America!

Comments (Page 9)
11 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10 11 
on Sep 02, 2007
Clinton did not receive the kinds of dire warnings about al-Qaeda attacking our country that Bush did from Mar to Sept 4, 2001.


you said that
Bush IGNORED the Warnings of Clinton



so which is it clinton didn't know or clinton warned bush.

on Sep 03, 2007
What we do know is Bush IGNORED the dramatic warnings he received from the CIA


Um...you don't know that.  You don't have the knowledge of what specific counter-terrorism operations were going on.  You just assume that if the NYT doesn't publish it on the front page, then it's not happening.  The warning were vague and you are trying to make hypothetical situations into fact.  You are ridiculous.


Clinton did not receive the kinds of dire warnings about al-Qaeda attacking our country that Bush did from Mar to Sept 4, 2001.


Once again, how do you know?  The first WTC bombing, Kobar towars, USS Cole, etc.  Why need warnings when you are constantly attacked?

Look how you defend a democrat and just go back to the usual "blame Bush" nonsense.  I can't stop laughing.


on Sep 03, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Sunday, September 02, 2007
Clinton did not receive the kinds of dire warnings about al-Qaeda attacking our country that Bush did from Mar to Sept 4, 2001.


you said that
Bush IGNORED the Warnings of Clinton



so which is it clinton didn't know or clinton warned bush.

Clinton knew Bin Laden was a problem and he tried to kill him. He WARNED Bush of that danger. Tenet asked Bush to approve the use of the new Predator that could have both identified Bin Laden and killed him. Bush failed to act on the Tenet request from Jan to Sept 2001 to approve the armed Drone.
on Sep 03, 2007

Clinton knew Bin Laden was a problem and he tried to kill him. He WARNED Bush of that danger.




again he gave ben laden a three hour warning. so no he didn't try to kill him. and two times after this attempt he was offered ben laden on a platter and refused.


so again it was clinton not bush who didn't do anything.
on Sep 03, 2007

Again he gave Ben laden a three hour warning. so no he didn't try to kill him. and two times after this attempt he was offered Ben laden on a platter and refused.


SHOW US WHERE CLINTON TOLD BIN LADEN he was about to attack him! That is BS. It took about 1.5 hours for the missile to reach the target and the reminder of the time to get the release orders to the ship. That is why it was so important for Bush to have approved the use of the armed Predator Drone. It can attack a target as soon as it is identified. It took Bush 9 months of prodding by the CIA Director and the attack on 9/11 to get Bush to authorize the use of this new weapon system. WHY!!!!!!!
on Sep 03, 2007
SHOW US WHERE CLINTON TOLD BIN LADEN he was about to attack him!




i watched the news for three hours before the missiles hit. if i can watch the news and know. then i think that ben laden can watch the news and know too don't you .
on Sep 03, 2007
HOW do you answer the Bush failure to approve the use of the Armed Predator Drone?

on Sep 03, 2007
SHOW US WHERE CLINTON TOLD BIN LADEN he was about to attack him!


Why does he need a warning when bin laden already attacked?  Keep being an apologist for democrats gene, it's just hilarious.


on Sep 03, 2007
You can't avoid a cruise missile and the idea that AQ got an intel report telling them a cruise missile had been launched against, GIVING THEM TIME TO LEAVE THE BLAST RADIUS, is a hollywood type mind creation, and is ridiculous.

They were either not in the right place, or the cruise missile missed.

When did Clinton know about AQ? He knew about them in 1993 when they attacked the World Trade Center in 1993. When did he see the damage a terrorist attack could do inside the United States, 1995 when Oklahoma city was bombed, by an American terrorist.

The original plan of the first WTC attack, was to break the foundation of the first tower, to the extent that it collapsed into the second tower, and collapsed them both, destroying the buildings in the shadowed area, perhaps causing a domino effect certainly causing a major disaster, perhaps even larger than the 9/11 attacks.

In 1998, they destroyed the US embassy in East Africa. Killing 300.

In 2000 they attacked the U.S.S. Cole in Yemen.

All the evidence you really need about Clinton failing to act against a sworn enemy of the United States is here.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/10/181819.shtml?s=ic

Where Clinton was in a shitstorm of the Lewinsky scandal, entirely of his own making by the way, through poor choices and "CEO type misconduct" unable to execute the decision to get UBL because he was having coffee talk and some under the desk cigar action.

Come on, your job as the President isn't to get blow jobs during office hours. It's to keep the country safe. Granted Bush has walked all over the Earth with the military and spent billions on this never ending war on terror and occupation of Iraq.

Clinton should have done a better job, a more persistent job of, nabbing UBL or decapitating him, and nipping AQ in the bud, if he had, we'd be living in a different world. But his concern was one worded after the failure of the Israelis and Palestinians to stop killing each other, a battle that continues to this day. That word is "Legacy" It would seem Bush could give a rats ass about "Legacy" and for that I give him credit as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda#First_World_Trade_Center_bombing

on Sep 03, 2007
You can't avoid a cruise missile and the idea that AQ got an intel report telling them a cruise missile had been launched against, GIVING THEM TIME TO LEAVE THE BLAST RADIUS, is a hollywood type mind creation, and is ridiculous.



you can't avoid a cruise missile that takes one hour to get to it's target and you have three hour notice it is on the way. why.
on Sep 03, 2007



ANSWER THIS QUESTION:

HOW do you answer the Bush failure to approve the use of the Armed Predator Drone?
on Sep 03, 2007
HOW do you answer the Bush failure to approve the use of the Armed Predator Drone?


why do you want to give the cia unsupervised use of this weapon when the military doesn't have it.
on Sep 03, 2007


Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, September 03, 2007
HOW do you answer the Bush failure to approve the use of the Armed Predator Drone?


why do you want to give the cia unsupervised use of this weapon when the military doesn't have it.

To help locate Bin Laden and his Lieutenants so that he could have been eliminated and thus help to prevent 9/11![/B]
on Sep 03, 2007
why do you want to give the cia unsupervised use of this weapon when the military doesn't have it.


on Sep 03, 2007
Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, September 03, 2007
why do you want to give the CIA unsupervised use of this weapon when the military doesn't have it.


The issue is NOT if the CIA or the Military were to use this weapon system to eliminate Bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Bush did not approve of it to be employed. WHY!!!!!! The Military had been using the unarmed version for combat Intel.
11 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10 11