Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on August 28, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


On August 24th I posted this Blog which elicited many truly asinine comments that demonstrate the hypocrisy of many who Blog on Joe User-




Bush & Rice Should be Impeached for NOT Protecting America!

The United States spends Billions of dollars each year to collect and process intelligence for one propose—To provide the President and National Security Advisor information to help defend this country from attack.

In my Blog I documented scores of such warnings provided Bush and Rice by the CIA in the six months before the 9/11 attack on our country. When I pointed out that these warnings were ignored by both Bush and Rice, many on this site defended the inaction of the President and National Security Advisor. Statements such as there was no actionable intelligence were presented. In fact the CIA warnings identified the group that was planning the attacks, they said they were near term and in some cases even identified the use of air planes as missiles that they planned to use in their attack. The only thing they did not contain was the exact date and place. Others claimed the information George Tenet presented about all the warnings was just fluff for his book. This despite those warnings were the end result of thousands of people we employed to do just want they did - providing warnings that Bush and Rice ignored. We should have saved the money and effort because the intended use of the intelligence gathered and presented to the President and his principal security advisor was IGNORED.

In addition, this intelligence and the warnings were NOT presented to the appropriate intelligence committees in Congress at the time for any needed legislative action to help protect our country. In fact the most important warning was kept secret for over 5 years. That warning was provided by the CIA Director on July 11, 2001 that said the danger was so great that the United States needed to be placed on a WAR FOOTING in order to try and prevent Bin Laden from carrying out his intended attacks on our country.

Bottom line the President and National Security Advisor failed to act on the CIA warnings and, as we all know, Bin Laden was successful in attacking our country on Sept 11, 2001. Thus all the warnings that Bush and Rice ignored and failed to provide to Congress were CORRECT! When I document this many on this Blog Site either attack me or attempt to discredit the warnings provided by the multi billion dollar intelligence agency that exists for the express purpose of providing the very information that Bush and Rice IGNORED! WHAT HYPOCRACY on the part of anyone that would defend the failure of Bush and Rice to fulfill their NUMBER ONE responsibility - the security of America!

Comments (Page 7)
11 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last
on Aug 30, 2007
You are way too kind, Paladin.


I am sorry but I refuse to resort to name calling. I gave and accrate discription of what he is doing which makes him a hack. To call him a moron would only serve to insut them, I try not to call him a democrat because I love the democrats I know even though I disagree with most of them they don't act like col. Gene.
on Aug 30, 2007
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007
Here is a FACT


“That's not a fact. You act like nothing at all was being done about terrorism, while completely ignoring everything else that is being told you to. Sept. 11 was planned up to five years beforehand; I don't see you complaining about that. What a joke. Do you anything but blaming Bush?”

Bush did not act on the warnings from the CIA. In August 2001 when he got the PDB that said "Bin Laden determined to attach within the U.S." He just continued his vacation and nothing was done. He ignored all the warnings I posted and on 9/11 all those warnings came true!
on Aug 30, 2007
Bush did not act on the warnings from the CIA. In August 2001 when he got the PDB that said "Bin Laden determined to attach within the U.S." He just continued his vacation and nothing was done. He ignored all the warnings I posted and on 9/11 all those warnings came true!


Once again, you can't see he didn't do anything because you don't have access to counter-terrorism operation.  Remember gene, there is a whole world out there besides what the NYT's tells you.  Not everything in printed on the front page.

You still conveniently ignore posts that completely pummel your argument, and it for you to just cut and paste the same tired rhetoric is just typical from you.

All your complaining about the things Bush has done to fight terrorism, and now you complain he didn't do enough.  That is pure liberal hypocrisy at its best.


on Aug 30, 2007
He ignored all the warnings I posted and on 9/11 all those warnings came true!

You posted pre-9/11 warnings on JU and President Bush ignored them? Not the PDB or the CIA, but YOU?!

My goodness, well then he's totally shamelessly guilty. And you are a prophet. How did the media and the CIA miss your clear warning signs?

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::
on Aug 30, 2007
Hey!!! all you guys!! Stop trying to CONFUSE GENE with facts!!! I will not stand by and allow this!!!!!


ok you don't have to stand by and allow this. you can sit down
on Aug 31, 2007
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007
Bush did not act on the warnings from the CIA. In August 2001 when he got the PDB that said "Bin Laden determined to attach within the U.S." He just continued his vacation and nothing was done. He ignored all the warnings I posted and on 9/11 all those warnings came true!


Once again, you can't see he didn't do anything because you don't have access to counter-terrorism operation. Remember gene, there is a whole world out there besides what the NYT's tells you. Not everything in printed on the front page.


Bush and Rice had the warnings from the CIA that we were about to be attacked by al-Qaeda and they did nothing. The CIA was correct which was proven by the attack on 9/11. You can not bull shit that away!
on Aug 31, 2007
Bush and Rice had the warnings from the CIA that we were about to be attacked by al-Qaeda and they did nothing. The CIA was correct which was proven by the attack on 9/11. You can not bull shit that away!


How many times do we have to tell you vague warnings aren't actionable?  You failed to answer my question and result to your usual nonsense.  Once again we have called you on your nonsense and you still don't see it.  LOL.
on Aug 31, 2007

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Friday, August 31, 2007
Bush and Rice had the warnings from the CIA that we were about to be attacked by al-Qaeda and they did nothing. The CIA was correct which was proven by the attack on 9/11. You can not bull shit that away!


How many times do we have to tell you vague warnings aren't actionable? You failed to answer my question and result to your usual nonsense. Once again we have called you on your nonsense and you still don't see it. .


Take this country to a War Footing is NOT Vague. Bin Laden determined to attack within U.S. is not vague. That is especially true when the group that is being warned about has attacked us three times in the past!
on Aug 31, 2007
Col gene's modo

"Repetition is the key to success"
on Sep 01, 2007
Take this country to a War Footing is NOT Vague.


what is it? what is a war footing? We were on a war footing for 40 years and it did not stop terrorist from attacking us for the last thirty years of that war footing? WOW you look really dumb going to a war footing against a nation which is what our military are trained to fight. Going to a war footing would not have stopped the attack on 9/11 since the military is prohibited from fighting inside the US on police actions and the terrorist were already in the country when that suggestion was made to the President.

Bin Laden determined to attack within U.S. is not vague.


Wrong again! It is the unclassified title of the presidents daily brief. If it was so important and so vital to get the president moving on this, then why is it that it was the only PDB on bin Laden prior to the attack? What else was there going on that would push bin Laden off the radar screen?
on Sep 01, 2007

Reply By: Paladin77 Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007
Take this country to a War Footing is NOT Vague.


what is it? what is a war footing? We were on a war footing for 40 years and it did not stop terrorist from attacking us for the last thirty years of that war footing? WOW you look really dumb going to a war footing against a nation which is what our military are trained to fight. Going to a war footing would not have stopped the attack on 9/11 since the military is prohibited from fighting inside the US on police actions and the terrorist were already in the country when that suggestion was made to the President.


Bin Laden determined to attack within U.S. is not vague.


Wrong again! It is the unclassified title of the presidents daily brief. If it was so important and so vital to get the president moving on this, then why is it that it was the only PDB on bin Laden prior to the attack? What else was there going on that would push bin Laden off the radar screen?


BUSH FAILED TO ACT AND WE WERE ATTACKED BY BIN LADEN. NO AMOUNT OF YOUR BULL SHIT CAN CHANGE THAT!
on Sep 01, 2007
WE WERE ATTACKED BY BIN LADEN.


no one is trying to change this fact.

what we are trying to do which is a waste of time is tell you that you cannot go on a war footing JUST BECAUSE. and the us military cannot operate inside the usa.
on Sep 01, 2007

Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007
WE WERE ATTACKED BY BIN LADEN.


No one is trying to change this fact.

What we are trying to do which is a waste of time is tell you that you cannot go on a war footing JUST BECAUSE. and the us military cannot operate inside the usa.


Going on a War Footing has nothing to do with using the military within the U.S. It has to do with mobilizing the law enforcement and the public. In. WWII for example black out curtains were used in homes on the both coasts. Alerting immigration, better control of the borders (here the National Guard could have augmented the Border patrol). The issue is that six months of warnings we were in grave danger were ignored by Bush and Rice. So what could have been dome was not done. We did not put to use the Intelligence that we produced for the express purpose of defending our country. Further, the warnings that Bush ignored were about attacks from a terrorist organization that has attacked us three times in the past and be had identified them as our attacker. To IGNORE such warnings by the President and National SECURITY ADVISOR is CRIMINAL.
on Sep 01, 2007

Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007
WE WERE ATTACKED BY BIN LADEN.


No one is trying to change this fact.

What we are trying to do which is a waste of time is tell you that you cannot go on a war footing JUST BECAUSE. and the us military cannot operate inside the usa.


Going on a War Footing has nothing to do with using the military within the U.S. It has to do with mobilizing the law enforcement and the public. In. WWII for example black out curtains were used in homes on the both coasts. Alerting immigration, better control of the borders (here the National Guard could have augmented the Border patrol). The issue is that six months of warnings that we were in grave danger were ignored by Bush and Rice. So what could have been done was not done. We did not put to use the Intelligence that we produced for the express purpose of defending our country. Further, the warnings that Bush ignored were about attacks from a terrorist organization that had attacked us three times in the past and we had identified them as our attacker. To IGNORE such warnings by the President and National SECURITY ADVISOR is CRIMINAL.
on Sep 02, 2007
black out curtains were used in homes on the both coasts.


so black out curtains would have stopped 9/11


Further, the warnings that Bush ignored were about attacks from a terrorist organization that has attacked us three times in the past and be had identified them as our attacker




this would be the group that clinton ignored and or said he was sorry that we were in their way.
11 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last