Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on November 5, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


In the past I have concentrated the major policies on the Bush Administration. This Blog will document some lesser choices made by Bush and enacted into law by the GOP controlled Congress from 2001-2007.

Bush cut funding for the IRS which has REDUCED the number of agents at a time when we need to insure we collect all the taxes due under existing law to reduce the budget deficit.

Bush cut funding for Social Security staffing and the number of the staff has fallen at a time when the work load has begun to increase.

Bush has cut the staffing at the FDA and Product Safety Commission at a time when imports are skyrocketing and the need for these inspectors has never been greater. It is also in the face of several years of increased examples where dangerous products have been allowed to come into our country.

Bush has not requested the added staffing for border guards six years after 9/11.

Bush has cut funding for cancer research for the past three years.

Given what is needed I can not see any possible justification for ANY of the above actions by the Bush Administration. Congress allowed these totally improper actions to take place by blindly passing the Bush budgets year after year. In addition, the manpower for our military should have been increased starting before we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan which demanded MORE troops that Bush simply failed to request. Again Congress failed to act and went along with Bush and we are now faced with a very serious manpower shortage in both the Army and Marine Corps.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 05, 2007
Great job gene!  I will be sure not to vote for Bush in '08.  LOL.
on Nov 05, 2007

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007
“Great job gene! I will be sure not to vote for Bush in '08.


Better also look at the GOP incumbents in November 2008 who are just as responsible as Bush!

I notice you have not been able to come up with ANY coherent and rational justification for these choices!
on Nov 05, 2007

Better also look at the GOP incumbents in November 2008 who are just as responsible as Bush!

I notice you have not been able to come up with ANY coherent and rational justification for these choices!

You are obsessed with Bush, gene.  Nothing we tell you matters so why should anyone waste their time.  Why don't you concentrate on the next election instead of constantly complaining about a lame duck Presidnt who isn't staying in office much longer?

Why don't you start by telling us how democrats will pay for all their proposed social programs.

on Nov 05, 2007
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007

Better also look at the GOP incumbents in November 2008 who are just as responsible as Bush!

I notice you have not been able to come up with ANY coherent and rational justification for these choices!

You are obsessed with Bush, gene. Nothing we tell you matters so why should anyone waste their time. Why don't you concentrate on the next election instead of constantly complaining about a lame duck Presidnt who isn't staying in office much longer?

What does that have to do with who you support in 2008? I have been talking about the next election both Congress and for President!
on Nov 05, 2007

I have been talking about the next election both Congress and for President!

You mean your one-sided posts about the GOP?

 

 

on Nov 05, 2007


In the past I have concentrated the major policies on the Bush Administration. This Blog will document some lesser choices made by Bush and enacted into law by the GOP controlled Congress from 2001-2007.

Bush cut funding for the IRS which has REDUCED the number of agents at a time when we need to insure we collect all the taxes due under existing law to reduce the budget deficit.

Bush cut funding for Social Security staffing and the number of the staff has fallen at a time when the work load has begun to increase.

Bush has cut the staffing at the FDA and Product Safety Commission at a time when imports are skyrocketing and the need for these inspectors has never been greater. It is also in the face of several years of increased examples where dangerous products have been allowed to come into our country.


Hmmm, for a guy who claims to have knowledge about business you sure do show yourslf to know very little if anything. My company has had to let go people, and what do the Depts who lose people have to do now that they are short handed? Ever head of working a little harder and picking up the slack? Do you honestly believe that people are not capable of doing more than they are currently doing when working in a fully staffed job?

It's sad to see that we don't expect people to work a little harding when times require it, that it's better to have twice as many people so everyone can work half as hard. Especially in a time where people barely work half as hard as they did 50 years ago with all the latest in technology and comforts that we have today.

It's even more ironic how this is not adding to the deficit yet it bothers Col. So if you cut back to save money, Col gets mad, if you waste more money without raising taxes, Col gets mad. I wonder if Col gets pleasure from anything these days?
on Nov 05, 2007

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007

I have been talking about the next election both Congress and for President!

You mean your one-sided posts about the GOP?

I have provided the results of the policies of Bush and the GOP. In addition, most of the GOP Presidential candidates are not talking about the change Americans want but to continue the same old GOP/Bush policies! There is no question the majority are not satisfied with the way the country is being run so who would anyone support candidates that offer “Stay the Course”?
on Nov 05, 2007
There is no question the majority are not satisfied with the way the country is being run so who would anyone support candidates that offer “Stay the Course”?


Why would Americans suppport more useless social programs and more of a nanny state?

Many of the democrats acknowledged they won't pull out of Iraq immediately, including Hillary.


on Nov 05, 2007
Bush has cut funding for cancer research for the past three years.


Bush cut funding for Social Security


Bush cut funding for the IRS




i thought you said that the congress controls the spending. so if these cuts took place then it was the congress that OKed it.


by the way 2007 congress was controlled by the demowhackheads.
on Nov 05, 2007

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007
“There is no question the majority are not satisfied with the way the country is being run so who would anyone support candidates that offer “Stay the Course”?


Why would Americans support more useless social programs and more of a nanny state?”

However they do want to insure Social Security is protected and do not support privatization which most of the GOP candidates support. They also want health care and I do not see that with the GOP candidates.

“Many of the democrats acknowledged they won't pull out of Iraq immediately, including Hillary.”

The difference is that the democrats believe we must set a time line and begin the process. That is what most Americans want. I do not hear that from the leading GOP candidates.

Americans also want a different trade policy-- One that keeps the jobs in this country. The GOP candidates would continue the current policy that has failed for over 13 years. Thus, on major issues the positions supported by the leading GOP candidates and what most Americans support are very different. The Republican candidates are too conservative and the majority of Voters ARE NOT CONSERVATIVES. The GOP does not seem to get that!
on Nov 05, 2007


I thought you said that the congress controls the spending. So if these cuts took place then it was the congress that OKed it.

What has taken place for the first 6 years of Bush is that Congress Rubber Stamped what Bush included in the Budget. Congress in essence allowed Bush to set the spending by passing what ever he suggested! Bush now believes that he is the decider when it comes to the Budget. He needs to read, or have LAURA READ HIM, the Constitution.
on Nov 05, 2007
That doesn't make it Bush's fault - it makes it Congress's fault for rubber stamping.
on Nov 05, 2007

By the way 2007 congress was controlled by the demowhackheads.

The 2007 Budget was approved by the GOP Controlled Congress. All these cuts were proposed by Bush and Rubber Stamped by the GOP Controlled Congress. The first budget for the Congress controlled by the Democrats is the 2008 budget.
on Nov 05, 2007
Hmmm, for a guy who claims to have knowledge about business you sure do show yourself to know very little if anything. My company has had to let go people, and what do the Depts who lose people have to do now that they are short handed? Ever head of working a little harder and picking up the slack? Do you honestly believe that people are not capable of doing more than they are currently doing when working in a fully staffed job?

It's sad to see that we don't expect people to work a little harding when times require it, that it's better to have twice as many people so everyone can work half as hard. Especially in a time where people barely work half as hard as they did 50 years ago with all the latest in technology and comforts that we have today.

It's even more ironic how this is not adding to the deficit yet it bothers Col. So if you cut back to save money, Col gets mad, if you waste more money without raising taxes, Col gets mad. I wonder if Col gets pleasure from anything these days. YES - Reading the stupidity you write!

Increased productivity is good but it only goes so far. It will not insure the border is protected. It will not provide the needed troops for all the deployments. In addition, the increase in the workload at the IRS, Product Safety and FDA has proven they need MORE not LESS staff. Only an IDIOT like you and Bush would ignore these needs!
on Nov 05, 2007

They also want health care and I do not see that with the GOP candidates.

So you want socialized healthcare?  The person who whines the most about budgets would have no problem with the federal government handling health care?  LOL.


It will not insure the border is protected.

And I suppose democrats who want illegals as a new voting class will?


Only an IDIOT like you and Bush would ignore these needs!

Is this your typical response to anyone who challenges your BS?

 

 

3 Pages1 2 3