Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on December 21, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


The help President Bush signed into law this week will help some 200,000 people with mortgages that are in trouble. Some argue that Tax Payers should not bail out the bad choices of individual home owners or the mortgage industry. If the consequences of these failures only impacted those who made the bad choices that rational would make sense.

The problem is that the magnitude of the mortgage failures could trigger a major recession and credit crises. That is why the fed and Bush have decided to act. Former Fed Chairman Greenspan believes the mortgage problem is a VERY serious issue and has supported actual direct funding from the federal Government to individuals to help them refinance their mortgages to avoid default.


To date about 3 million mortgages have defaulted and there are as many as another 2 million that are believed to be in danger of defaulting. The plan Bush provided only deals with 200,000 of the 5,000,000 mortgages that are part of this problem. That means Bush has provided help for about FOUR PER CENT of the problem! Does he believe that the possible recession and credit problem can be avoided by dealing with only 4% of the problem?

The action Bush and his administration took to solve major issues facing our country do not come close to fixing the problem at hand. It is just like the Bush plan to give tax credits so people without health insurance can afford to purchase private insurance. The estimate is that the Bush health plan would solve the issue for 3 of the 47 million who need health insurance. That is just over 6% of the health insurance problem. Why does take action Bush takes does not deal with the issue at hand? So Bush and his SPIN DOCTORS can make it look like he CARES!

Comments (Page 3)
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5 
on Dec 22, 2007
I thought Hillary was for 'mandatory health care' which just hurts the poor who can't afford health care by putting them in prison/fining them for not having healthcare, which, as I've already stated, they can't even afford.

If she's for universal healthcare, that's a completely different animal. Say goodbye to choices. Say goodbye to reason in the healthcare industry. It's not like it wasn't already on the way out, but it will be gone in a flash if we go to a universal healthcare system.
on Dec 22, 2007
Reply By: danielostPosted: Friday, December 21, 2007
The fact remains the wealthy got a huge tax cut from Bush and the GOP that was justified by this surplus that did not exist.
the fact is they deserve an even bigger tax cut.


You do not know what you are talking about. Please explain WHY?


Reply By: danielostPosted: Friday, December 21, 2007
Gene, I know you want to help the poor by taking from the rich - but the policies you support do the exact opposite.
he won't get it


Tell that to the millions of Kids that do not have health insurance because Bush Vetoed the S-CHIP Bill. Tell that to disabled who could not live without housing assistance and food stamps. Tell that to the poor who could not get health care without Medicaid. This help is for the MOST basic Human needs and to watch the way the wealthy live and listen to the dribble on JoeUser about protecting the rich while ignoring the very poor makes me sick.



on Dec 22, 2007
This help is for the MOST basic Human needs and to watch the way the wealthy live and listen to the dribble on JoeUser about protecting the rich while ignoring the very poor makes me sick.


The rich don't need protection. They're find by themselves. And when you start to make their lives miserable by taxing them more, they are the ones that have the resources to go elsewhere. Or live off what they already have, instead of producing wealth for the government.

To watch the way the poor live and still call them poor makes me sick. Health insurance is not a need, Gene. The disabled have help. The poor have help. Increasing the limits is only going to help the middle class. The poor are taken care of, as long as they don't try to climb at all.
on Dec 22, 2007
This help is for the MOST basic Human needs and to watch the way the wealthy live and listen to the dribble on JoeUser about protecting the rich while ignoring the very poor makes me sick.




i thought the most basic human needs was food and sleep.
on Dec 22, 2007
Reply By: JythierPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007
This help is for the MOST basic Human needs and to watch the way the wealthy live and listen to the dribble on JoeUser about protecting the rich while ignoring the very poor makes me sick.
The rich don't need protection. They're find by themselves. And when you start to make their lives miserable by taxing them more, they are the ones that have the resources to go elsewhere. Or live off what they already have, instead of producing wealth for the government.


Taxing the rich will not cause them any RERAL harm. They will not go to bed hungry or their kids will not suffer from a lack of medical treatment. All it will do is impact their GREED! They may have to only replace their fleet of Rolls Royce’s every other year rather then every year!
on Dec 22, 2007
Reply By: danielostPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007
This help is for the MOST basic Human needs and to watch the way the wealthy live and listen to the dribble on JoeUser about protecting the rich while ignoring the very poor makes me sick.
i thought the most basic human needs was food and sleep.


and housing, clothing, medical care, transportation.
on Dec 22, 2007
Tell that to the millions of Kids that do not have health insurance because Bush Vetoed the S-CHIP Bill.


That is not the reason they do not have health insurance, Gene, though I'm sure you could care less about the distinction. It is ironic in the extreme that a blog devoted to "truth" is so devoid of it.
on Dec 22, 2007
clothing, medical care, transportation


you can do with out these.


and that is what city buses are for.
on Dec 22, 2007
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007
Tell that to the millions of Kids that do not have health insurance because Bush Vetoed the S-CHIP Bill.
That is not the reason they do not have health insurance, Gene,


YES it is. If Bush had not vetoed the S-CHIP they would have health insurance they do not have today!
on Dec 22, 2007
It is ironic in the extreme that a blog devoted to "truth" is so devoid of it.


All that I post is "TRUTH" The problem with you and others on this Blog Site is that you do not want to admit the truth because the TRUTH shows Bush and the GOP for what they are—Scrooges!
on Dec 22, 2007

YES it is. If Bush had not vetoed the S-CHIP they would have health insurance they do not have today!





hate to break this to you gene, but most of us on here would have vetoed it too.
on Dec 22, 2007
All it will do is impact their GREED!


You continue to fail to understand that it WILL NOT IMPACT THEIR GREED EITHER!
on Dec 22, 2007
the only greedy one on here gene is you.
on Dec 22, 2007
Reply By: danielostPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007
YES it is. If Bush had not vetoed the S-CHIP they would have health insurance they do not have today!
hate to break this to you gene, but most of us on here would have vetoed it too.


That means that you are just like Bush

Reply By: danielostPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007the only greedy one on here gene is you.


Anyone that supports what Bush and the GOP do is GREEDY!

on Dec 22, 2007
Anyone that supports what Bush and the GOP do is GREEDY!


no someone who wants what someone else has is greedy.


it doesn't matter if they hide behind helping the poor or not it is still greed.


and it is against at least one of the ten commandments.


which as a Christian you are supposed to believe in.
5 Pages1 2 3 4 5