Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
Published on December 21, 2007 By COL Gene In Politics


The help President Bush signed into law this week will help some 200,000 people with mortgages that are in trouble. Some argue that Tax Payers should not bail out the bad choices of individual home owners or the mortgage industry. If the consequences of these failures only impacted those who made the bad choices that rational would make sense.

The problem is that the magnitude of the mortgage failures could trigger a major recession and credit crises. That is why the fed and Bush have decided to act. Former Fed Chairman Greenspan believes the mortgage problem is a VERY serious issue and has supported actual direct funding from the federal Government to individuals to help them refinance their mortgages to avoid default.


To date about 3 million mortgages have defaulted and there are as many as another 2 million that are believed to be in danger of defaulting. The plan Bush provided only deals with 200,000 of the 5,000,000 mortgages that are part of this problem. That means Bush has provided help for about FOUR PER CENT of the problem! Does he believe that the possible recession and credit problem can be avoided by dealing with only 4% of the problem?

The action Bush and his administration took to solve major issues facing our country do not come close to fixing the problem at hand. It is just like the Bush plan to give tax credits so people without health insurance can afford to purchase private insurance. The estimate is that the Bush health plan would solve the issue for 3 of the 47 million who need health insurance. That is just over 6% of the health insurance problem. Why does take action Bush takes does not deal with the issue at hand? So Bush and his SPIN DOCTORS can make it look like he CARES!

Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Dec 22, 2007
which as a Christian you are supposed to believe in.


No one that is a Christian can support turning our backs on the children or by starting a war that was not justified. We were not in ANY danger from Saddam and Bush lied about the danger from Iraq. Mike Huckabee is correct about the Bush Foreign policy.
on Dec 22, 2007
Say I have gross revenues of $10,000,000 a year, pay salary to employees of $5,000,000 per year, other fixed expenses of $4,000,000, and take home $1,000,000 in profits. Now, about half of that is going to the government through taxes, so I really only get $500,000. I like this amount of money. Now, you raise taxes on me because I'm in the top 10%. Do I now take home $400,000? No - I cut $200,000 in salaries so I can still take home my $500,000. Now 4 workers are out of work instead of working happily, because you raised my taxes. The tax increase did not affect me at all. I'm still just as money-grubbing as before. But you did affect the poor you're trying to help.
on Dec 22, 2007

If it prevents a recession it will help the wealthy and they have the resources to pay a little more in taxes.

But you don't know if it will prevent a recession or not. The people who need bailing out aren't exactly big contributors to the economy.

If you are so certain it would, then why don't you pay the same increase that you espouse I pay?

on Dec 22, 2007

Anyone that supports what Bush and the GOP do is GREEDY!

How do you define, "greedy", Gene?  I pay vastly  more than you do in taxes. I am sure I give away more money each year than you do by far to those who "need" it.

People who demand the property of others while giving nothing in return are the greedy ones.

on Dec 23, 2007
Reply By: JythierPosted: Saturday, December 22, 2007Say I have gross revenues of $10,000,000 a year, pay salary to employees of $5,000,000 per year, other fixed expenses of $4,000,000, and take home $1,000,000 in profits. Now, about half of that is going to the government through taxes, so I really only get $500,000. I like this amount of money. Now, you raise taxes on me because I'm in the top 10%. Do I now take home $400,000? No - I cut $200,000 in salaries so I can still take home my $500,000. Now 4 workers are out of work instead of working happily, because you raised my taxes. The tax increase did not affect me at all. I'm still just as money-grubbing as before. But you did affect the poor you're trying to help.


That is not correct. Cheney had an income of $1.7 Million last year and paid 23% in income Tax. Cheney paid $6,045 in Social Security taxes or 3/10 of one percent. A person with an income of $100,000 pays the same dollar amount as Cheney or 6% or 20 times the % as Cheney.
on Dec 23, 2007
GREED is “excessive desire for acquiring or having; desire for more the one needs”. That describes the wealthy like Cheney and Bush. It also describes the people who support the Bush and the GOP policies of the past 7 years!
on Dec 23, 2007

GREED is “excessive desire for acquiring or having; desire for more the one needs”. That describes the wealthy like Cheney and Bush. It also describes the people who support the Bush and the GOP policies of the past 7 years!

Really? You are a mind reader now? You know they have an excessive desire? You know how much someone "needs"?

I wonder what your definition of a fascist is? Maybe someone who believes they should be able to decide how much other people "need" to live?

Why don't you demand that your taxes be increased by say $20,000 a year to help support these programs?

on Dec 23, 2007
Why don't you demand that your taxes be increased by say $20,000 a year to help support these programs


First I did not get the big tax cuts and second my income is not even close to the top 10%!
on Dec 23, 2007
First I did not get the big tax cuts and second my income is not even close to the top 10%!


so
on Dec 23, 2007
Really? You are a mind reader now? You know they have an excessive desire? You know how much someone "needs"?


People making a million dollars have a lot more then anyone NEEDS under any reasonable standard. There is no reason why the wealthy can not pay more in taxes. They should NEVER have been given the Bush tax cuts since they were not being overtaxed in 2001 as Bush claimed. Our tax burden was just equal to our spending and that is what we need to achieve. After we settle on the amount we will spend, we need to insure we tax that same amount. It is just like a person who must either have a job that provides what they need to pay their bills or get either a better paying job or a second job if they do not have enough money. The answer is not to just put it on the plastic like Bush and the GOP are doing!
on Dec 23, 2007
People making a million dollars have a lot more then anyone NEEDS under any reasonable standard.


again who made you the person to decide how much is to much for anyone to make.


also who made you the person to decide how much they can afford to pay in taxes.


also who made you the person to decide that the rich don't have as many problems as the poor do.
on Dec 24, 2007
again who made you the person to decide how much is to much for anyone to make. also who made you the person to decide how much they can afford to pay in taxes. also who made you the person to decide that the rich don't have as many problems as the poor do.


ONLY A FOOL would argue that people making hundreds of thousands or millions per year do not have far more then the NEED! If you want to make such a statement, be my guest!
on Dec 24, 2007
ONLY A FOOL would argue that people making hundreds of thousands or millions per year do not have far more then the NEED! If you want to make such a statement, be my guest!




then i am a fool. because i don't know if said person has medical expenses that i don't know about.
on Dec 24, 2007
you see gene your assuming that the guy making a million or more doesn't have any more expenses than you. but you have no idea what they are paying for.


maybe they have the mom and dad in the hospital. or wife or kids or some other family member.


bill gates was donating 300 million a year to charity. where would that money have come from if he wasn't making more than that. how many kids was he helping with that 300 million.
on Dec 24, 2007
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, December 24, 2007
ONLY A FOOL would argue that people making hundreds of thousands or millions per year do not have far more then the NEED! If you want to make such a statement, be my guest!
then i am a fool. because i don't know if said person has medical expenses that i don't know about.


Any person with an income at that level would have medical insurance and your excuse is just that-- AN EXCUSE!

Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, December 24, 2007you see gene your assuming that the guy making a million or more doesn't have any more expenses than you. but you have no idea what they are paying for. maybe they have the mom and dad in the hospital. or wife or kids or some other family member.



The issue is not can someone spend (Have expenses as you put it) that much but do they have what they NEED! Anyone with incomes like I am using can afford to return to the tax rates in effect during the 1990's and have every thing and more then they NEED!!!!!

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5