Evaluation of the policies of George W. Bush and his Republican conservatives on America.
America needs a change
Published on September 5, 2005 By COL Gene In Politics


This disaster and its impact on New Orleans and the Gulf coast was not only predicted but there were detailed plans prepared showing what needed to be done to strengthen the levees around New Orleans and the coastline along the Mississippi river. These studies and simulations were prepared in 2001 and 2002 for the Bush administration. They were almost 100% accurate as to the consequences of failing to rebuild this infrastructure in the largest port in the United States. George W. Bush ignored these studies and the warning contained in them.

The studies clearly indicated what it will take in terms of rebuilding the levees to withstand category four and five hurricanes as well as repairing the coast line along the Mississippi. The cost to rebuild the region would have been in the $20-$30 Billion range according to the studies. Bush, rather than starting to implement ths essential rebuilding, actually cut the funding for the Corps of Engineers to that region beginning in late 2001. He diverted the money to the war in Iraq. The truth is that our priorities are DEAD WRONG! With 10% of what George W. Bush has spent in Iraq, we could have completely rebuilt the levees in New Orleans and the Mississippi coastline and prevented this disaster from occurring. Now we need to rebuild an area as large as Great Britain and still need to repair the levees and the Mississippi coastline. The cost in human lives and dollars are many times what it would have been if Bush had his priorities in line with the NEEDS of this country!

In addition, water levels are rising because of the global warming and here again the Bush administration has done nothing to protect our environment and ignores a growing problem that the use of fossil fuel is helping to create. Rather than seek alternate energy sources with the hundreds of billions of dollars that we are dumping in the Iraq War, we ignore our energy needs. There are studies that show the infrastructure of the United States is aging and that it will take more than $1 trillion dollars to repair all the levees, bridges, roads, electrical grids, dams, schools, water and sewer systems throughout this great nation. There is NO money for these needs but we have SPENT 1/3 of what it would cost to rebuild the infrastructure across the entire Unites States with what we have spent in Iraq. The time has come to redirect the priorities in America to meet the long term needs of our people and not the political ideology of the conservatives in this country! Bush cuts the federal revenue with tax cuts and ignores essential repairs. He starts a war that did not make us more secure and spends the money needed to help rebuild America on that war. WAKE UP AMERICA!

IF THERE IS ONE USEFUL THING KATRINA HAS DONE, IT IS TO SHOW HOW WRONG THE BUSH AGENDA IS FOR AMERICA!



Comments (Page 5)
6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 
on Sep 08, 2005

NOT TRUE.

The Possie Act allows the president to act to preserve order. It also allows the Navy to assist the Coast Guard in ANY emergency.

WRONG AGAIN BOYS Look at what IKE did on Alabama if you want proof!


Try again! By your "own" words! "To "preserve order". Preserve order is NOT a natural disaster! Just to help you out oh clueless one. Alabama was to preserve order. Now how does that equate to a natural disaster?
on Sep 08, 2005
You Bushies are the scum of the earth.


The level of intellectual argument on Gene's part just keeps getting better & better.

I repeat, pathetic.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Sep 08, 2005
It's nuts to think that the friggin President of the United States has knowledge of every corps of engineers report. One town out of tens of thousands, one state out of 50, amid all the international issues to keep track of. It's funny how the Col says "his report" as if the penned it and slept with it under his pillow.


I think that anyone who thinks he should have woken up one morning and said "Hey, wasn't there something about a levee?" is an idiot. Even if those levees were his responsibility, which I am not convinced they were, I'm sure there were 100 people between them and the President in terms of chain-of-command.


"We are talking about 25-30 times that number that needed to be evacuated. "


30 times 7000 is 210,000 people you nit. There wasn't anything like that left over in New Orleans, and most of those who stayed behind could have gotten out, they simply chose not to. In terms of the the infirm and people without transportation, those buses could have most certainly got them all in a trip or two.
on Sep 08, 2005
The reports I read said in excess of 150,000 remained. They still believe there are 15,000. If you think 700 busses would have solved the problem, you just do not understand the size of the problem. Only the Active Military could have handled this problem. The looting and the inability of the police or national Giarg to control the situation gave the President the authority to send in Federal Troops. He has Federal troops in there now!
on Sep 08, 2005
The reports I read said in excess of 150,000 remained. They still believe there are 15,000. If you think 700 busses would have solved the problem, you just do not understand the size of the problem. Only the Active Military could have handled this problem. The looting and the inability of the police or national Giarg to control the situation gave the President the authority to send in Federal Troops. He has Federal troops in there now!


Col, they never even tried the buses. That's the start of the problem. You keep blowing this off and going back to the usual "it's Bush's fault". This is why you are not taken seriously.
on Sep 08, 2005
How do you know where the people are? Was there a local hotline set up for people who needed a ride? If there was a list of people to pick up, then the buses most certainly didn't need to be sitting there doing nothing. Since the buses couldn't carry them all, it was wise to leave those they COULD carry behind?

let's pretend that we had the ABILITY to move 20,000+ troops and enough vehicles there to move 150,000 people there in a couple of days. Would they have gone? Why didn't all the ones with the ability to go do so?

I don't think for a moment 150,000 people stayed behind because they didn't have transportation. (I honestly don't believe 150,000 people stayed behind.) I don't believe even a 10th of the ones that did stay behind would have left, even if the government had been standing there begging.

I DO, know, however, had Bush sent in the military in a house-to-house operation dragging US citizens from their homes, you'd have been right here bitching about how he overstepped his authority. You'd have made up a thousand inane conspiracy theories about how Bush was starting a new reich or something.

Bush, Bush, Bush. Don't you see how sad you seem Col? Don't you realize that every time you do a hack job like this it just depletes the menial amount of credibility you have? You have no motivation beyond your hatred for Bush.

No one is going to believe you feel anything about New Orleans. Hell, I don't even think you believe a lot of this is Bush's fault. It's just another blunt little tool in your one-job toolbox.
on Sep 08, 2005
I DO, know, however, had Bush sent in the military in a house-to-house operation dragging US citizens from their homes, you'd have been right here bitching about how he overstepped his authority. You'd have made up a thousand inane conspiracy theories about how Bush was starting a new reich or something.


Exactly. I can just see col's thread now. "DICTATOR BUSH HAS TAKEN MILITARY CONTROL".
on Sep 08, 2005
So done with this IDIOT conversation. I stated what should have happened at the state level, and the states impacted (and those that could have been) DARN WELL COULD HAVE RAISED 30 BILLION to fix the levees them darn selves!!!!! BUSH CUT FUNDING, he sure as well did, and I would have too since the FUNDING wasn't funding the Levies, it was funding CORRUPTION AND BRIBES!!!

THE Army is NOT allowed to "police" without a request from LOCAL Government. That's why EACH STATE has a National Guard under the Governors control! What is the National Guard going to do if the Governor don't even know what's going on and needed. Stand around with their thumbs up their butt and get shot at?

HEY BUSH, DECLARE WAR ON NEW ORLEANS!!! Then he could send the Reserve.

OH, and just for your information, I am NOT a Bush Supporter!! If you would spend 3 seconds reading the titles to my blog, you would see I voted Nader. I was in the Reserves, Stationed in Nebraska 63S, Trained FT. Lenard Wood A-2-10, So GET OVER YOURSELF.

If you are so die hard military, you would support YOUR president REGARDLESS!
on Sep 08, 2005
The reports I read said in excess of 150,000 remained. They still believe there are 15,000. If you think 700 busses would have solved the problem, you just do not understand the size of the problem. Only the Active Military could have handled this problem. The looting and the inability of the police or national Giarg to control the situation gave the President the authority to send in Federal Troops. He has Federal troops in there now!


Hey clueless one...just how many active military vehicles would it take to transport 150,000 people? Go on take a guess for us. The active military couldn't move ALL those people at one time! That means multiple trips. And on top of all that, it was pointed out "YOUR" math is WRONG! 40 people per bus and 700 buses equal 28,000 people. NOT 3500 like you claim. That being the case, 2 trips for each bus would have been 56,000 people! And 4 trips for each would have been 112,000 which almost would have taken care of the problem, wouldn't it? BIG difference huh? So find something else to get goofy about!
on Sep 08, 2005
#54 by Community AT Work
Thursday, September 08, 2005

I see everyone slamming col, but no one saying anything about the fact that Bush saw what could happen and did not act on the info and later cut the funding to the area in question.



#56 by Island Dog
Thursday, September 08, 2005

So now Bush can see the future? If Bush could see so could the mayors and governors. But they chose things like building a new sports arena. Cutting the funding does make one bit of difference in this situation.


Ummmm... Bush could have and did red the very same thing that FEMA read and most of the insurures read about the area. No future or suth saying here. NO was in peril for years before this and they, including Bush, knew about it.


I can understand why people are bashing Col, but it seems what he brought up was ignored. There is plenty of blame to go around for this one, but uts not Bush's fault alone by no means.
on Sep 08, 2005
I also agree with how many people would have actually left. You have people who live in these neighborhoods that do not have much. They are less likely to leave it so that their neightbors can steal it. They knew who their neighbors are and plus, poor people just tend to want to hang on to what they have gotten because of how hard they worked for it.

Also understand that lack of education and wealth can create more doubt in understanding of what is ahead of them.

I dare say the school buses would have made 3 trips and that would have been it and no more than 50,000 would have actually left.
on Sep 08, 2005
I did not claim the military was to evacuate the people before the storm and neither could have 700 school busses. The point was that on Monday when it was clear how big of a problem there was, and we saw the lawlesness on TV , why did Bush not send the Active Military to maintain order, distribute food and water, treat the injured and evacuate the people. It took until Saturday before the gurad arrived which is 6 days after the storm hit that area. It was clear the local police, the state police nor the National Guard could respond quickly. So we allowed 1.5 Million Americans to go unhelped from Monday till Saturday when help got started. If that is the best Bush can do, he should step down and let someone else do his job! This storm was more then the local and state officials could handle and the President, with hundreds of thousands of men and women on active duty in this country were not called upon to help their fellow Americans! Why? Becaure the Commander-in-Chief did act with the most effective resources that he could of used to help those people. God help us if we have another terrtorist attack. Bush will wait for the Boy Scouts.


on Sep 08, 2005
You know something, COL Gene? My 10 year old son just sat down and read through your intial article, plus all of the responses that have been posted (all 72 as of this writing).

His initial response? "How clueless can this jerk be?" After I stopped laughing (because he has no idea what ID I use here and what I think of it all and he pretty much pegged it.), I got onto him for calling a retired veteran (sad but true) names.

Even if he was 100% correct.
on Sep 08, 2005
So we allowed 1.5 Million Americans to go unhelped from Monday till Saturday when help got started.


Help didn't start on Saturday col. Do you think absolutely nothing was happening during the week?
on Sep 08, 2005



I did not claim the military was to evacuate the people before the storm and neither could have 700 school busses


Again a clue for you. The evac was called for "BEFORE" Katrina hit!

So we allowed 1.5 Million Americans to go unhelped from Monday till Saturday


And yet "another" clue for you. There was NO 1.5 million left in N.O.! Only 150,000! Since you seem to have a problem lately doing the math.....That's LESS > than a quarter of a million. Get real! Hell there aren't that many people living in New Orleans.


population of Greater New Orleans at 1,337,726


So sorry, WRONG AGAIN!
6 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6